Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post bug reports and ask for help with other issues here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
USSAmerica
Posts: 19211
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 4:32 am
Location: Graham, NC, USA
Contact:

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by USSAmerica »

When you call him on the phone, he will say his name is Jimmy, and he's located in Indiana.  [:D]
Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me

Image
Artwork by The Amazing Dixie
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5246
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by zuluhour »

[:D] No offense to Indians, but I do not want to put to sea with Wasp with an 800 help line in charge.
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by michaelm75au »

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

FUBAR: see below (2-posts)


Image
Attach a save pls
Michael
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by michaelm75au »

Updated installer.

Sometimes air ground attack with friendly LCUs in hex wouldn't rebuild list of units in hex to get the enemy ones.
Michael
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6422
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by JeffroK »

When the indian Cricket Team sent out for a new captain that isnt quite what they meant!!
(Commonwealth joke only!)
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
budman999
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 8:54 pm

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by budman999 »

I had this same error - only Indian commanders available.
Latest patch, Aug. 1942.
I think the carrier was either the Wasp or Hornet in a single carrier TF.
Ubique
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10820
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: michaelm

Updated installer.

Sometimes air ground attack with friendly LCUs in hex wouldn't rebuild list of units in hex to get the enemy ones.
Michael,

Thanks for the great ongoing support!!!

[&o][&o][&o]
Pax
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5246
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by zuluhour »

save attached: ref: Wasp FUBAR
Attachments
wpae010.zip
(2.61 MiB) Downloaded 11 times
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5246
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by zuluhour »

MichaelM; I hope I did the save correctly, its been awhile.
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5246
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by zuluhour »

Oh Yeah, PS [&o][&o][&o]
User avatar
Califvol
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 2:24 am
Location: The Land of Yore

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by Califvol »

ORIGINAL: BigDuke66

@Califvol
Switch to Foobar, never had problems running that in background, who needs Real Player anyway?

Thanks for the tip! It appears that solved my issues.
Why am I sharing my opinion? Because I am such a special snowflake that others need my knowledge. What…there are like a billion snowflakes? Oh, well isn't that special.
User avatar
BigDuke66
Posts: 2035
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Terra

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by BigDuke66 »

My pleasure.

@michaelm
Any chance for a filter that shows idle(no loading or unloading) task forces on the TF list?
User avatar
Treetop64
Posts: 933
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:20 am
Location: 519 Redwood City - BASE (Hex 218, 70)

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by Treetop64 »

ORIGINAL: michaelm

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

FUBAR: see below (2-posts)


Image
Attach a save pls


It could be worse. All your ships could be taken over by Japanese commanders! [:D]

Those were the days...
Image
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by michaelm75au »

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

save attached: ref: Wasp FUBAR

The IND is in charge of Wasp and thus that seems to be the controlling factor in regard to the TF leader.

Changing the Wasp to a US leader, makes the TF leader list pop up with many choices.

The initial issue would have been why IND leader was made the captain of the Wasp!
Michael
User avatar
Oliver Heindorf
Posts: 1911
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 2:49 am
Location: Hamburg/Deutschland

CV TF Force allocation

Post by Oliver Heindorf »

Despite the Ghost Indian take over over the Wasp, another thing catched my Eye:

"He who combines Semi-modern CV's (Wasp) with slow old Battle wagons ( pre War BB's) and slow CVE's ans Semi modern CA's deserves it exactly the way it goes."


No american Commander really wanted to reign this crappy combination of forces and thats why the IND took over sayin' "Hey, I'll do the job". [:'(][:D]
User avatar
jeffk3510
Posts: 4143
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:59 am
Location: Merica

RE: CV TF Force allocation

Post by jeffk3510 »

I would have to agree with you Oliver..
Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5246
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by zuluhour »

Thanks MichaelM!!! I never put into a foreign port with Wasp, so I'm unclear how the situation arose.

My friend Oliver, the task force was for viewing pleasure[;)] as I was trying alot of stuff to figure out why I had an Indian Admiral.
jmbraat
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 7:39 pm

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by jmbraat »

In the same vein, the two Kiwi cruisers begin the war with ensigns in command ...
"Conquer, or Die!"
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by m10bob »

Another thread reminded me to ask: When making an amphibious landing, I may deploy capital ships with the landing forces, but in so doing, also commit their fire power to enemy land suppression, therefor, I like to keep a friendly surface force in the same hex to ward off enemy suface raiders and neutralize most air intruders.
Problem:Once a friendly suface force is engaged, the force commander allows his force to sail away, leaving that hex weakened. Might there be a way to keep that force in that hex?
Thank you michaelm for your consideration.
Image

User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r8 updated 14 January 2012 (2nd part)

Post by michaelm75au »

One interesting thing brought to my attention on the Industry Management screen.
[ No change is being made. This is just for my information.]

1. The Engine column shows the total production as the total number of active devices. Which would equate to the likely number of engines for the 30-day month. As a result, the HI required total is for the same time period.
The actual production would more likely be 1/30 of that total, and thus 1/30 of the required HI.
2. The Air column doesn't show the required HI for production. Again both these figures are (or would be) for a 30-day period.

As it has been this way since the introduction of the screen, no one obviously has any issue with this.[:D]

But should it really show this (the required HI) as a 30-day total when all the other totals basically show as a turn requirement??
Or are players using the 30-day totals as a guide to ensuring that they keep plenty of HI to support the continual production of engines and aircraft.

[edit]
The other thing I just noticed is that even when production is turned off, the 'required' totals are still updated with them.
Michael
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”