question about 'secure bridge'?

Command Ops: Battles From The Bulge takes the highly acclaimed Airborne Assault engine back to the West Front for the crucial engagements during the Ardennes Offensive. Test your command skills in the fiery crucible of Airborne Assault’s “pausable continuous time” uber-realistic game engine. It's up to you to develop the strategy, issue the orders, set the pace, and try to win the laurels of victory in the cold, shadowy Ardennes.
Command Ops: Highway to the Reich brings us to the setting of one of the most epic and controversial battles of World War II: Operation Market-Garden, covering every major engagement along Hell’s Highway, from the surprise capture of Joe’s Bridge by the Irish Guards a week before the offensive to the final battles on “The Island” south of Arnhem.

Moderators: Panther Paul, Arjuna

Post Reply
Phoenix100
Posts: 2974
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:26 pm

question about 'secure bridge'?

Post by Phoenix100 »

Does anyone know - if I detatch a unit and order it to secure a bridge, what does it do once it has achieved that objective? Hang around for a bit then reattach itself to its parent HQ (what I've seen happening, I think), revert to 'Defend' at the site of the bridge (what I'd like it to do), or something else? I mean, what is meant to happen? Recently I watched a unit secure a bridge then somehow reattach itself to its HQ and wander off, leaving enemy units across the other side of the river a freebie.
Phoenix100
Posts: 2974
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:26 pm

RE: question about 'secure bridge'?

Post by Phoenix100 »

Scratch that question. I see now that the unit in question actually routed away and this seemed to have the affect of reattaching it to the HQ. Whcih I guess is ok.
User avatar
Arjuna
Posts: 17768
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:

RE: question about 'secure bridge'?

Post by Arjuna »

What should happen is the force ordered to secure a crossing should defend there till you give it another order. As a general rule we try and avoid second guessing what the player wants.
Dave "Arjuna" O'Connor
www.panthergames.com
Phoenix100
Posts: 2974
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:26 pm

RE: question about 'secure bridge'?

Post by Phoenix100 »

It would be normal, then, that if it routs it reattaches?
User avatar
Arjuna
Posts: 17768
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:

RE: question about 'secure bridge'?

Post by Arjuna »

No, why should it. In RL if a unit was given an order and routed it would still be under those orders and so that is what should happen here.
Dave "Arjuna" O'Connor
www.panthergames.com
Phoenix100
Posts: 2974
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:26 pm

RE: question about 'secure bridge'?

Post by Phoenix100 »

Oh, well, that's not what happened. It reattached itself, in fact.

I seem to be noticing a few reattach anomalies. I'll have to save more.

It reattached itself, ran off (not necessarilly in that order) and the enemy took the bridge.
User avatar
Arjuna
Posts: 17768
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:

RE: question about 'secure bridge'?

Post by Arjuna »

Be careful here. What might appear to you as a reattachment may not be so in practice. Next time confirm the command arrangement by ensuring that you have the player structure displayed and select the unit and note the command line drawn to its superior.
Dave "Arjuna" O'Connor
www.panthergames.com
Phoenix100
Posts: 2974
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:26 pm

RE: question about 'secure bridge'?

Post by Phoenix100 »

ok
Post Reply

Return to “Command Ops Series”