Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Erkki
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:03 am

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by Erkki »

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon
Nice job Erkki. I mentioned earlier you might have to venture that far out to find something. The bases you mentioned showing Allied activity were bang on for my game as well. Only Christmas, Tahiti, Pago Pago and Suva were built up. I think taking any of those bases would throw a monkey wrench into the Allied buildup. The supporting islands tend to be completely ignored, take any of the main ones and the Allies' would be thin in the secure LOC department to Australia short of the map edge and Cape Town.

Hey.

Indeed, but at the moment Allies are not building Baker, Fijis or New Caledonia. The furthest Japanese outposts are on Tabiteuea and Ndeni - both will get reinforced as soon as I have the units to spare(currently they have 120 AV worth of SNLFs each). Ndeni & Santa Cruz Islands wont be part of my MLR but just perimeter bases to give some early warning and to deny those bases from the Allies. Once the Guadalcanal area gets built up some more I'll begin with Milne Bay area and the 3 furthermost Solomons' islands. Ndeni I think is far too far and vulnerable to attacks from New Caledonia and Fiji.

As to KB... Lets see what we get tomorrow. A sigint entry from last turn revealed Tahiti to have ships at port but no aircraft(at least probably).
User avatar
Erkki
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:03 am

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by Erkki »

May 16th


Kido Butai: Yesterday's tanker convoy is apparently split up into 1-ship task forces heading every direction. KB picks up a single destroyer far away but the Admirals dont consider it enough to launch a strike. KB near Tahiti tomorrow, still unsighted but the replenishment force 4 days behind is tracked by Catalinas.

Pearl Harbor: What looks like a mass-exodus from Pearl towards West Coast sails over the Japanese submarine screen, but no hits are scored. Largest warships left at Pearl are destroyers or light cruisers, while at least one task force with heavy surface units left Pearl to NE overnight.

Burma: The only Burma front Zero unit swaps its A6M2s to 27 factory fresh A6M3s! There are now almost 300 A6M2s in the pool.

Kido Butai looking for its prey:




Image
Attachments
1942_05_16_KB.jpg
1942_05_16_KB.jpg (55.25 KiB) Viewed 150 times
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by obvert »

I've been waiting for the continuation of this. Has the game been on hiatus for a few days?
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Erkki
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:03 am

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by Erkki »

May 17th

Kido Butai: nothing.

DEI: Japanese cruiser squadron finishes off the last Dutch PT boats - kills go to a destroyer and CA Haguro.

Home Islands: R&D advances Ki-49-IIa to 7/1942!


May 18th

Kido Butai: Continues to West and is now near Aitutaki(the northernmost island of Cook Islands). At extreme range to SW, 2 Allied task forces are sighted and the B5Ns attack twice: both AM and PM phase about 1/3 of the bombers fail to find target due to range and bad weather, and AM attacks only find a single destroyer to attack(its missed), but PM phase attacks hit a 5-ship convoy with a DD and a DM escorting 2 xAP and an xAK, sinking a 8000-ton xAP Santa Maria with 5 bomb hits and hitting a large xAK (identified as the 6000-ton C3-E type Exhibitor) twice, putting it on fire. Half the raiding force continues to West while the other half turns WNW to link up with the scout cruiser CS Chitose and the replenishment force. Once we have the raiders refueled in 4 days the force turns NW to raid Pago Pago and Fiji from directly South.

Burma: The second IJAAF squadron converts to the Ki-44-IIa. The window of opportunity for the Allies to hit Magwe's oil fields and refineries is closing...


EDIT: obvert: you got your update soon! [8D][:D] I decided not to update last turn as almost nothing happened(again), plus I was a little busy with this "real life" thing. [;)]
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by obvert »

At least you found a few juicy targets to make the journey worth it down there.

How much R n D do have in the Helen IIa to push it up two months?
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Erkki
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:03 am

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by Erkki »

ORIGINAL: obvert

At least you found a few juicy targets to make the journey worth it down there.

How much R n D do have in the Helen IIa to push it up two months?

R&D factories for Ki-49-IIa are now 104 factories plus one 5(5), and a size-10 building the Ki-49-Ia. I'm intending to let one size 30 R&D factory continue to Ki-49-IIb and build 2-3 major factories for IIa together with the smaller ones until I need them for some other plane type. I'm planning to build some 120 Ki-49-IIas per month initially.
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by obvert »

Just so I get this straight, if I pass on the Ki-49 Ia, and switch the R n D over to Ki-49 IIa before it enters production, will I then have the Helen IIa R n D factory at fully repaired full capacity? Or do I have to actually use at least one of the R n D factories for production before flipping another to R n D?
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Erkki
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:03 am

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by Erkki »

Nope, you can use the No Upgrade function to prevent them from converting into production factories... Or just upgrade them to next plane on the path as soon as they're fully repaired. I was only producing 35 Army bombers a month and so decided to build the Ki-49-Ia 10 a month - I converted a 12 plane training unit to the Ki-49-Ia to free up some Ki-21s and I'll soon have planes to fill another unit.
User avatar
Erkki
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:03 am

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by Erkki »

May 18th - May 22nd


Silent turns with not much to report happening. Java will be completely Japanese in 4 days while we are bombing Mataram and Denpasar to burn supplies from the remaining Allied float planes' support units.

KB has seen nothing but shoots a Catalina or 2 down today. The CVs are nearing Fiji tomorrow, where submarine-based E14Ys report 2 task forces with assorted small auxiliary vessels and destroyers.
User avatar
Erkki
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:03 am

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by Erkki »

May 23rd


Kido Butai: Near Fiji! KB attacks a small convoy at Suva, sinking 2 x 5000 ton xAKs and hitting an escorting DMS with a 250kg bomb. 2 D3A1s assigned to naval search get shot down by the 8 P-40 Warhawks flying CAP, but miraculously they both survive to ditch near the fleet and the crews are saved. A B5N damaged by an xAK's anti-aircraft fire is also a writeoff. Suva's port has 4 APs - the KB continues to a position SW of Suva to attack the port while half of the strike aircraft are left to attack any fleeing shipping - there are 2 more task forces of small warships sighted.

KB's A6Ms meet 8 P-40s over Suva and the Elite Japanese pilots shoot down 4 of them as confirmed kills. The other 4 are also at least damaged with 2 reported as diving away trailing smoke and the 2 last as spinning away on fire, but their fates were not confirmed.

2 kills go to Hiryu's pilots, 2 to Shokaku's, 1 to Zuikaku's, 1 to Zuiho's(so its likely, although not sure, that at least 6 were destroyed + possible writeoffs, ops losses as landing accidents etc.).
User avatar
Erkki
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:03 am

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by Erkki »

May 24th

Kido Butai: 3 USN destroyers fleeing to West are sighted but not attacked. Guess they werent worth of it. 90-bomber strike to Suva's port scores 2 bomb hits(sinking an xAKL and finishing off an xAK damaged in yesterday's attack) also scoring mighty 2 port hits. The small warships in the port were not hit.


May 25th

Kido Butai: KB now returning to Truk.

DEI: On Java, the remains of the Dutch forces surrender at Banjoewang(SE tip of the island). Java is now 100% Japanese!
User avatar
Erkki
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:03 am

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by Erkki »

May 26th-29th


Not much worth reporting happened, but I'll do a quick summary on each front with the current situation.


Burma: Very little happening on either side as we are now suffering from the Monsoon rules. I'm moving engineers ahead to build bases along the railway to Myitkyina, while the airfields in basin are starting to be pretty well built up. IJNAF and IJAAF have swapped out 1/3 of the used to be 120 Ki-43s to Ki-44-IIas and the 30 Zeros are now brand new A6M3s. IJAAF is now starting to do small raids against enemy troops at Chittagong and around it(clear terrain) using a squadron size unit of Ki-43s and 30 Ki-21 bombers. I want to wake up the Allies.

DEI: The Japanese "operational base" for the future attacks across Timor Sea is nearly ready. In 2 weeks Japanese Marines will land at Kendari, Ambon, Waingapoe and Denpasar(at least) and also take Cocos Islands in the Indian Ocean. Invasion troops are ready on Java(though not prepared) and more support troops are being brought from Home Islands and Philippines.

SOPAC: Everything dead quiet in the Solomons as Kido Butai is arriving at Truk in 4 days.


As you may already know, my opponent will now be away for some time on a skiing trip. I'll be having plenty of time to plan ahead! Any screenshot(or other) wishes, comments? [:)]
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by obvert »

I know this mod makes the game go much slower. I'd love to see what all of it looks like, but especially the DEI, Burma and China. Mainly to see how this affects the pace of your operations in those regions.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Erkki
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:03 am

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by Erkki »

ORIGINAL: obvert

I know this mod makes the game go much slower. I'd love to see what all of it looks like, but especially the DEI, Burma and China. Mainly to see how this affects the pace of your operations in those regions.

For starters, here is the whole map with only bases visible. [:)]

My pace of operations has slowed down after I realized the Allies wont be lifting a finger. I have all the most important bases and not hurrying with the mopping up - I know I have the time.



Image
Attachments
1942_05_29_kartta.jpg
1942_05_29_kartta.jpg (216.32 KiB) Viewed 150 times
User avatar
Erkki
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:03 am

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by Erkki »

Here is also a quickly done map of Burma. As you can see Japan is rather thin on troops... Supply situation however will start improving soon as the bases along the railroad get built bigger to allow more supply flow even with the Monsoon penalties:



Image
Attachments
1942_05_29_burma.jpg
1942_05_29_burma.jpg (317.81 KiB) Viewed 150 times
Nanshin ron
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:38 pm
Location: Finland

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by Nanshin ron »

As a lurking Finnish JFB, only just preparing for my first PBEM, i wanted to say im glad you took you perimeter and KB there.[:)] I also think this is the area where Japan should roam now..
I hope you find his AOs and TKs..[:D]

How are you planning to use your subs and surface raiders?

How does intel,(sigint,reports,recon) in this mod compare to the vanilla?
You say he is being passive in all fronts.
What intel do you have on him at this stage?
Any analysis?




User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by obvert »

Cool to see these. Obviously you've done a lot of work clearing the PI and getting deep into Burma. Well done. Unless he's been reinforcing and supplying the remainder of the DEI I'm sure these will go quickly.

These are the areas where I have questions.

1. Is that Wenchow? This is such good terrain for the defender, and as it makes its own supply, if the Chinese have a lot here the troops could be getting stronger the longer it's left. Any plans for it? Also, the extra HI is always good to have.

I looked back a few pages and skimmed but couldn't find notes about China.

2. As for Wake and the Gilberts, I know these are not as important as the Solomons and DEI for advances in 43. However, if the Allied player has them both, it could lead to a lot of LBA supporting a move right through Central Pacific. Unless these are really built up it might be good to snag them this summer.

3. The Aleutians. If you pick them up easy during the summer, throw a few engineers here, and wait through the winter, it could at least postpone movement toward the Kuriles in March 43.

It could also brig out some fight in the Allies if it looks like you're moving forward and trying for all of them.

Just a few thoughts. You most likely have a set of plans for the next months and know better the limitations of your logistics in this mod, so I'm not even sure if the later two are worth the effort with the long journeys and supply needs.

Image
Attachments
144B0B020B..7179550C.jpg
144B0B020B..7179550C.jpg (204.33 KiB) Viewed 150 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Erkki
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:03 am

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by Erkki »

ORIGINAL: Nanshin ron

As a lurking Finnish JFB, only just preparing for my first PBEM, i wanted to say im glad you took you perimeter and KB there.[:)] I also think this is the area where Japan should roam now..
I hope you find his AOs and TKs..[:D]

How are you planning to use your subs and surface raiders?

How does intel,(sigint,reports,recon) in this mod compare to the vanilla?
You say he is being passive in all fronts.
What intel do you have on him at this stage?
Any analysis?

Hey;

First off to everyone reading this who hasnt followed this AAR closely, we already have the CV Yorktown down as a confirmed kill with 2 torpedo hits by a submarine near Sydney, so any Allied counterattack is more likely than not to approach by land or be quick hit n runs/1-day invasions far from the Japanese navy.

Smeulders' convoy routes are very far. I know a month ago he used Adelaine and Melbourne as his AUS ports and routed all convoys around Tahiti or so. There is little chance to get there without getting detected and I'm not sure if it'd be worth of it. The latest KB operation was done 50% because I want to keep Smeulders thinking I have KB always divided and 50% to get some kills while making sure he wont try an early invasion or a raid in SO/CENPAC and force him keep his CVs away(they're probably at Seattle now; I know they arent at PH, LA, Perth/Geraldon or Sydney).

On surface raiders: I'm not going to do them before the fireworks begin again. These would be high risk/low price operations and I rather have all my CAs and CLs afloat than get a few xAK kills while losing them to submarines, CVs or convoy escorts.

For the Japanese, DBB has exactly same(=not much at all) sigint. AFAIK Allied SigInt is same as in stock game, too.

On what the Allies are going to do, I have a feeling there might be a long silent time until November-December 1942, with perhaps some small skirmishing and air war over Burma, plus my last offensive operations of course(I half expect them to be unopposed). First major counterattack is likely to be on Burma front, but at earliest only after the Monsoon.


obvert:
Cool to see these. Obviously you've done a lot of work clearing the PI and getting deep into Burma. Well done. Unless he's been reinforcing and supplying the remainder of the DEI I'm sure these will go quickly.

Actually the Allies made a fighting retreat in Burma even when they had good defensive ground and more troops. I'm sure I'd still be at Rangoon had Smeulders tried defending, but he didnt. That cost him Burma(and with Monsoon he cant take it back until at earliest late in the year) and let me use full force against Singapore that fell over half a month ahead of schedule. [:)]
These are the areas where I have questions.

1. Is that Wenchow? This is such good terrain for the defender, and as it makes its own supply, if the Chinese have a lot here the troops could be getting stronger the longer it's left. Any plans for it? Also, the extra HI is always good to have.

I looked back a few pages and skimmed but couldn't find notes about China.

Yeah, its Wenchow. Chinese have 2 base forces and a Corps there while I have a DIV and a Rgt sieging - I'm bombing it daily with a squad of Ki-48s and I expect it to fall within a month - AVs are alrwady equal.

We made China a "quiet" theater with action being mostly local on both sides. Neither one of us is a great fan of the theater and the ground war(something witpae engine isnt particularly good at) slugfest wasnt much fun. Both sides have been moving troops behind the front, though, and IJAAF continues bombing campaign against KMT troop concentrations in clear terrain.

2. As for Wake and the Gilberts, I know these are not as important as the Solomons and DEI for advances in 43. However, if the Allied player has them both, it could lead to a lot of LBA supporting a move right through Central Pacific. Unless these are really built up it might be good to snag them this summer.

3. The Aleutians. If you pick them up easy during the summer, throw a few engineers here, and wait through the winter, it could at least postpone movement toward the Kuriles in March 43.

It could also brig out some fight in the Allies if it looks like you're moving forward and trying for all of them.

Just a few thoughts. You most likely have a set of plans for the next months and know better the limitations of your logistics in this mod, so I'm not even sure if the later two are worth the effort with the long journeys and supply needs.

I'm going to grab and (lightly) hold the rest of the Gilberts, but for now I'll have to leave Wake and Aleutians. There arent enough troops to adequately garrison even the current holdings, and I really cant afford to keep KB, let alone multiple fleets, at seas too much. Plus, I have something else in mind and I need the KB there, after it has done its refits first.

I dont think Wake can support 4Es so its not a major threat, I actually hope it to entice the Allies to do some raiding near KB's home port, even touch n go invasions of Marcus(120AV forts 4), Iwo, Marianas or Marshalls.
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by obvert »

Sounds solid all around. I guess playing such a passive opponent part of your strategy becomes how to lure them into thinking they have the advantage and can fight earlier than they want to. I wasn't thinking in these terms really. But it really does make good sense to attempt to lure them out earlier, when your fleets and airpower are still at an advantage.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Erkki
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:03 am

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Post by Erkki »

Smeulders is back, and so is this AAR.


May 30th

Some good news today!

Philippines: Japanese forces at Bataan peninsula have been waiting for long. A deliberate attack was ordered for today, and the results are very promising: despite having only 80-90% of the defender's numbers(1150 vs 1350 AV) and fighting in defensive terrain, the attack still dropped fortifications from 4 to 3 and achieved nice 3:1 odds! It seems that the combined PA and US Army defenders are finally out or about to be out of supplies. Attackers still suffered nearly twice the casualties, so we'll need a week or so to replenish strength before the next attack. Many of the defending combat units seemed to be effectively useless, completely disabled, even before the attacks, and I doubt the Allies can restore much, if any, of the strength lost today.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”