The biggest drawback to this game........

Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: The German-Soviet War 1941-1945 is a turn-based World War II strategy game stretching across the entire Eastern Front. Gamers can engage in an epic campaign, including division-sized battles with realistic and historical terrain, weather, orders of battle, logistics and combat results.

The critically and fan-acclaimed Eastern Front mega-game Gary Grigsby’s War in the East just got bigger and better with Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: Don to the Danube! This expansion to the award-winning War in the East comes with a wide array of later war scenarios ranging from short but intense 6 turn bouts like the Battle for Kharkov (1942) to immense 37-turn engagements taking place across multiple nations like Drama on the Danube (Summer 1944 – Spring 1945).

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21, elmo3

Post Reply
TonyUk
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 7:49 pm

The biggest drawback to this game........

Post by TonyUk »

is lack of command and control. I play Hearts of Iron 3, here you can grab a corps/army or a whole army group and move them to where you want them.Even TAOW had this. Create new HQs ones too. Has this been fixed yet? Then there is the price - way too expensive, and without being able to move groups as mentioned above, way too fiddly and time consuming.
gradenko2k
Posts: 930
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 6:08 am

RE: The biggest drawback to this game........

Post by gradenko2k »

I'd settle for a faster interface, honestly. It's one thing to visualize and know how you want to organize your forces, but the task of actually reassigning them one division at a time is really tedious.
elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: The biggest drawback to this game........

Post by elmo3 »

Welcome to the forums TonyUK. I see you've been here over 5 years and this is your first post! Interesting. I think all Gary Grigsby games are about moving individual units rather than formations although I don't own them all and can't say for sure. But since that is his general design philosophy there is really nothing to "fix" in that regard. It either works for you or it doesn't. Many people would say the game is cheap for the entertainment value you get. You can always wait until the Matrix holiday sale next year if you missed it this year.
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
User avatar
csarebel
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:42 am

RE: The biggest drawback to this game........

Post by csarebel »

I think the orginal poster needs to consider the scale of the game when making a comparision to HOI. This is individual divisions, at times brigades and regiments with 10 miles per hex.

HOI does have individual divisions but it is region based, not hex based.

That being said it would be nice if long rail movements went a little faster. It can take several minutes to watch a stacked corp move to their new location.

Being able to create new hqs would be nice...if it can be done I dont know how (i play axis) but all in all I think the c&c is fine.
Speedysteve
Posts: 15974
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: The biggest drawback to this game........

Post by Speedysteve »

ORIGINAL: csarebel

That being said it would be nice if long rail movements went a little faster. It can take several minutes to watch a stacked corp move to their new location.

If you press the space bar when ordering the units to move they will move along much faster than normal.
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
User avatar
csarebel
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:42 am

RE: The biggest drawback to this game........

Post by csarebel »

ORIGINAL: Speedy

ORIGINAL: csarebel

That being said it would be nice if long rail movements went a little faster. It can take several minutes to watch a stacked corp move to their new location.

If you press the space bar when ordering the units to move they will move along much faster than normal.

That is excellent news! Thank you.
User avatar
Fänrik Stål
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 6:06 pm
Location: Sweden

RE: The biggest drawback to this game........

Post by Fänrik Stål »

ORIGINAL: Speedy

ORIGINAL: csarebel

That being said it would be nice if long rail movements went a little faster. It can take several minutes to watch a stacked corp move to their new location.

If you press the space bar when ordering the units to move they will move along much faster than normal.

Or if you disable the movement animation in the preferences you won't even have to press the space bar. Makes the first year of playing the soviets SO MUCH less tedious.[:D]
"Släpp ingen djävul över bron!"
Speedysteve
Posts: 15974
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: The biggest drawback to this game........

Post by Speedysteve »

That too [;)]
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
TonyUk
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 7:49 pm

RE: The biggest drawback to this game........

Post by TonyUk »

ORIGINAL: csarebel

I think the orginal poster needs to consider the scale of the game when making a comparision to HOI. This is individual divisions, at times brigades and regiments with 10 miles per hex.

HOI does have individual divisions but it is region based, not hex based.

That being said it would be nice if long rail movements went a little faster. It can take several minutes to watch a stacked corp move to their new location.

Being able to create new hqs would be nice...if it can be done I dont know how (i play axis) but all in all I think the c&c is fine.

Hello Elmo

Has it been that long really! I like your caption at the bottom, showed it to my wife. I expect I will buy the game at some point, but anything to speed it up somewhat.That is the downside, having to move each divsion must take ages. Then again when I used to play TAOW III(might try that again), the Soviets were virtually impossible to beat.And I just bought Vicky 2 as well, as I am a sucker for Paradox Interactives games!

Just one thing, is there an option in WITE to switch to 3D icons as a preference.
elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: The biggest drawback to this game........

Post by elmo3 »

No 3D icons, sorry. As mentioned above you can turn off the move animations (I never play with them on) to speed up play but you still have to move units one (or one stack of up to three) at a time. There are some smaller scenarios with fewer units, and a new set of 10 scenarios on a disk coming soon, if you feel the campaign game with all it's units is too much of a good thing.
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
User avatar
Templer_12
Posts: 1709
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:29 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

RE: The biggest drawback to this game........

Post by Templer_12 »

ORIGINAL: TonyUk

is lack of command and control. I play Hearts of Iron 3, here you can grab a corps/army or a whole army group and move them to where you want them.Even TAOW had this. Create new HQs ones too. Has this been fixed yet? Then there is the price - way too expensive, and without being able to move groups as mentioned above, way too fiddly and time consuming.
Really, you compare Gary Grigsby's War in the East with Hearts of Iron 3? [&:]
You missed something!
User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: The biggest drawback to this game........

Post by Flaviusx »

HOI 3 is the game I play when I want to run a country. WITE is a game I play when I want to run an army. They're different beasts. This is an operational game, HOI is grand strategic.

WitE Alpha Tester
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series”