Simple Balancer Fantasy (SBF) Mod

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design, art and sound modding and the game editor for WITP Admiral's Edition.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
oldman45
Posts: 2325
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 4:15 am
Location: Jacksonville Fl

RE: Simple Balancer Fantasy (SBF) Mod

Post by oldman45 »

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress

Got some new ship art for my mod:

Italian CV Aquila
German CV Graf Zeppelin
German CVL Seydlitz
French CV Joffre
British CV "Adjective" Class (basically an hypothetical earlier version of Ark Royal. I used Big B's Ark Royal as the base model)

Image


Are you going to be adding this art work to this thread?

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2785895
User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2617
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

RE: Simple Balancer Fantasy (SBF) Mod

Post by CaptBeefheart »

Color me interested in this mod. You guys probably are on this, but JuanG did some great stuff here:

tm.asp?m=2179124&mpage=1&key=AWNT%2CMod&#2189459

Some of the ideas for the Enhanced CV Variant are pretty good. BTW--Anybody know what happened to JuanG? He was doing great work then disappeared about a year ago.

Cheers,
CC
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
traskott
Posts: 1577
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:30 am
Location: Valladolid, Spain

RE: Simple Balancer Fantasy (SBF) Mod

Post by traskott »

How this project goes ??  [:)]
Halsey
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:44 pm

RE: Simple Balancer Fantasy (SBF) Mod

Post by Halsey »

bump...
GaryChildress
Posts: 6933
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by GaryChildress »

OK. I'm back playing around with ideas for this mod again. So far the mod is going to be a "No treaties" mod, meaning the Washington and London naval treaties, nor any treaties of any kind, will be in effect to hinder building. Again, the mod will put emphasis on minimizing mouse clicks = simplicity, and will obviously be based upon an alternative universe and not RL = fantasy. However, I'm going to get rid of the "Balance" part. Basically the Japanese are still going to be the underdogs due to their more limited building potential, however, they do get a jump start in the 1920s with a serious building program for their 8-8 navy. As a result they end up with an 8-8-8 navy (including the Kongos, Fusos and Ises). The war in Europe will still severely limit British involvement in the Pacific and there will be no German, Italian or French navies as originally planned.

God knows if I will ever finish this mod but it is always fun to plan and work on. [:D]

EDIT: New name for the mod will be "Hell in Paradise" or HiP
GaryChildress
Posts: 6933
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by GaryChildress »

Here is the Japanese lineup starting with BBs: Building on the 8-8-8 plan starts in 1922 and goes on until 1930, producing the following capital ships pictured at bottom.

Japanese battleship building then takes a hiatus in the 1930s as all the battleships are brought up to more modern standards, postponing any further new construction, including no Yamatos. The Yamato design hits the drawing board late in the 1930s but by the time they are ready to begin building WW2 has started and it is clear that BBs are not going to be needed as much as other ship types. Most of the 1930s will be spent building carriers and more modern cruisers, destroyers and support ships.

Image
Attachments
JapaneseBBs.jpg
JapaneseBBs.jpg (35.35 KiB) Viewed 420 times
GaryChildress
Posts: 6933
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by GaryChildress »

Japanese carrier production starts in earnest around 1930, once they realize they have built a huge battlefleet with almost no airpower to support it. First there are the two Shokaku class aircraft cruisers with 2 x 2 8" guns on the bow and the rest of the ship dedicated to aircraft operation. Later, along come the fleet carriers of the Kairyu class with relatively heavily armored flight decs at the cost of more limited aircraft operation. These are completed up through 1940. In 1940 plans are laid down for an improved fleet carrier of the Unryu class with a bit more armor but the same number of planes. These will be constructed and completed during the war (which starts with the bombing of Pearl Harbor Dec 7 1941 as historical). Coming alongside the Unryus is the Junho class CVL designed to augment the big carrier fleet which can't be everywhere at once. The Junhos are based upon a standard hull design which is also used in the constructions of support ships such as AVs, ARs, ASs, making the four ship types easily convertable into each other as needed. In game I will make conversion binds for AVs, ARs, ASs and CVLs so that they can readily convert into each other, although at a considerable time penalty for each conversion.

Image
Attachments
JapaneseCVs.jpg
JapaneseCVs.jpg (22.59 KiB) Viewed 423 times
User avatar
traskott
Posts: 1577
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:30 am
Location: Valladolid, Spain

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by traskott »

Fantastic idea !!! [:)]
GaryChildress
Posts: 6933
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by GaryChildress »

Thanks! I hope I get it completed someday. [:)]

Here's the overall list of Capital ships for "Hell in Paradise" (HiP). The main thing to note is that the 1920s is a period of enormous capital ship growth by the US, Japan and Britain. The 1930s sees a scale back in capital ship production as carriers enter the picture more prominently and later existing captial ships undergo their modernization programs. The hiatus on capital ship production ceases at the outbreak of WW2 and the US and Britain vamp up new capital ship construction again. The Japanese put plans on the table for the construction of the Yamatos in response, however, due to war time shortages, changes in fleet tactics, etc, the Yamatos are never laid down.

Also to note, Tiger and Canada are retained by Britain. Tiger is given to Australia and Canada is given to its namesake.

Class names include main armament and speed in parethesis and next to each ship is the commission date of the vessel.

Artwork is courtesy of myself, Big B and the contributors to AE. Most of my contribution was to cut and paste from standard AE artwork to create any new ships needed.



Image
Attachments
BBs 2.jpg
BBs 2.jpg (207.41 KiB) Viewed 418 times
GaryChildress
Posts: 6933
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by GaryChildress »

Here are the carriers. Carrier production doesn't really start in earnest until the mid to late 1930s and then continues throughout the war. Instead of open bows and unarmored hangars Japan, the US and UK opt for smaller aircraft contingents but more heavily armored flight decks and closed bows for better seakeeping. Japan creates a small fleet of light carriers to help fill any voids not covered by the big carriers. The US basically puts all it's eggs in the basket of large fleet carriers and doesn't invest in light carriers. The British invest in light carriers as trade protection carriers to help protect their far flung empire. All three navies start their initial carrier projects on converted large cruiser designs. The US and Japan retain the 8" guns of their flight deck cruisers but the British Furious class dispense with large guns in favor of greater AA protection to start.



Image
Attachments
CVs 4.jpg
CVs 4.jpg (120.74 KiB) Viewed 421 times
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by DuckofTindalos »

The years you list, are those commissioning dates or launching dates?
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
GaryChildress
Posts: 6933
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by GaryChildress »

Commission dates
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by DuckofTindalos »

You ARE of course aware that those 8in guns on the flight-deck cruisers will never, ever fire a shot in anger?
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
GaryChildress
Posts: 6933
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by GaryChildress »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

You ARE of course aware that those 8in guns on the flight-deck cruisers will never, ever fire a shot in anger?

They are built with the 8" guns. Do you think I should have the 8" removed due to modernization prior to the war? Maybe leave them looking a bit like HMS Furious?
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by DuckofTindalos »

Absolutely. All the world's navies with carriers carrying cruiser-calibre weapons were moving away from them at this point. The only reason the Akagi and Kaga still had theirs at Midway was because of bureaucratic inertia.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by DuckofTindalos »

If you must start with them, I think you make their removal part of an upgrade. The Lexington and Saratoga started out with 8-inchers too, and they were removed fairly quickly (the Lex didn't have hers at Coral Sea).
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
traskott
Posts: 1577
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:30 am
Location: Valladolid, Spain

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by traskott »

I have seen several PBEM on which both players would have sold their mums in order to have CVs gunned with 8'' ( last week sank the CVL Shoho via night engagement )
GaryChildress
Posts: 6933
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by GaryChildress »

Question for anyone out there who can answer this.

I need a naming scheme for some ficticious British auxiliaries. Basically I'm creating a class of auxiliaries which can be converted into each other or CVLs. I have a similar series of US ships I'm calling the "Bay" class, named after bays in the US. I need a naming convention for the British auxiliaries which isn't used by any other ships and which I could derive a good 50-100 names from. Basically the series would consist of AO, AS, AD, AV, AR and CVL versions. Here's a pic of what I'm talking about:



Image
Attachments
BritAuxiliaries.jpg
BritAuxiliaries.jpg (10.46 KiB) Viewed 421 times
kjnoel
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:43 am

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by kjnoel »

You could take the 1950s+ ton class minesweepers, plenty of those:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ton_class_minesweeper
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Simple Fantasy (SF) Mod: "Hell in Paradise"

Post by DuckofTindalos »

That's sound. But where in the ************* is the RN getting the resources to build that many auxiliaries?
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design and Modding”