ORIGINAL: FDRLincoln
I am a Northerner born and bred (and very extremely distantly related to Dan Sickles of all people) ...
Wasn't Sickles the only Union Corps commander not to have a monument on the battlefield?
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
ORIGINAL: FDRLincoln
I am a Northerner born and bred (and very extremely distantly related to Dan Sickles of all people) ...
[/center]I think Georgia and Virginia wanted to put one up back in 1875, or so.ORIGINAL: Joe D.
ORIGINAL: FDRLincoln
I am a Northerner born and bred (and very extremely distantly related to Dan Sickles of all people) ...
Wasn't Sickles the only Union Corps commander not to have a monument on the battlefield?
ORIGINAL: bjmorgan
I think Georgia and Virginia wanted to put one up back in 1875, or so.ORIGINAL: Joe D.
ORIGINAL: FDRLincoln
I am a Northerner born and bred (and very extremely distantly related to Dan Sickles of all people) ...
Wasn't Sickles the only Union Corps commander not to have a monument on the battlefield?
[/center]ORIGINAL: Joe D.
Wasn't Sickles the only Union Corps commander not to have a monument on the battlefield?

ORIGINAL: Joe D.
ORIGINAL: FDRLincoln
I am a Northerner born and bred (and very extremely distantly related to Dan Sickles of all people) ...
Wasn't Sickles the only Union Corps commander not to have a monument on the battlefield?
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
If we make it, we're going to walk Pickett's Charge.
Wouldn't that make it Jefferson Davis' charge?ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
If we make it, we're going to walk Pickett's Charge.
I have today been informed by a friend here who toured the battlefield last week with his sons that the official Park Service materials, signs, new visitor's center presentations, etc. now call it "Longstreet's Charge." He said that in a few places it is referred to as "formerly known as Pickett's Charge."
News to me. If we're going that way it should be "Lee's Charge" and be done with the vertical accountability.

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Wouldn't that make it Jefferson Davis' charge?
I saw the preview trailer on Steam and I wasn't even interested enough to watch the whole thing. Yuck and so forth.ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget
Tinkering with Gettysburg history seems to be en vogue - there is a brand-new game called "Gettysburg: Armored Warfare" where modern weapons are being sent back in time in order to change history (link). Alternate history ok, but this seems a bit exagerated...
ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget
Tinkering with Gettysburg history seems to be en vogue - there is a brand-new game called "Gettysburg: Armored Warfare" where modern weapons are being sent back in time in order to change history (link). Alternate history ok, but this seems a bit exagerated...




Boo-yah! Steampunk meets Longstreet! With Zeppelins! And exclamation marks! Who needs history when you've got shiny graphics in MMORPG?ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
I saw the preview trailer on Steam and I wasn't even interested enough to watch the whole thing. Yuck and so forth.ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget
Tinkering with Gettysburg history seems to be en vogue - there is a brand-new game called "Gettysburg: Armored Warfare" where modern weapons are being sent back in time in order to change history (link). Alternate history ok, but this seems a bit exagerated...
(Zeppelins?!!!!)

No. If you're going down that path of telegraphic availability, perhaps we should blame it on Morse.ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Wouldn't that make it Jefferson Davis' charge?
I thought of that too, but maybe there's a corollary for telegraphic availability. Going to the Nth degree, maybe it should be "Lincoln's Charge" since the whole war was "his fault." [:'(]

ORIGINAL: John 3rd
CR mentioned Peter Cozzen's works earlier. My esteemed Southern Friend, who put me on to this magnificent author, neglected to mention his recent work on the the Valley Campaign. This book just arrived here and has a nice round 700 pages of reading within it. Cannot wait..
The discussion here has been delightful and quite well toned as well as reasoned.
