41-45GC - A FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL - GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

TURN 12

5 turns till mud.
South overview before Russian moves:


Image
Attachments
T12_Axis_S..Overview.jpg
T12_Axis_S..Overview.jpg (539.91 KiB) Viewed 302 times
glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

South, close up.
As expected he manages to deliberate attack one hex, and hasty attack another.
Interestingly, it's the SS DAS that is in the hex Zocing Stalino. This division started the turn zocing Kharkov in the SW hex. That's more than 30 SP's movement and combat to end the turn next to Stalino.

IT's clear he has no interest for the moment in going East, he's got Stalino in his sights now.

Image
Attachments
T12_Axis_South_Zoom.jpg
T12_Axis_South_Zoom.jpg (707.62 KiB) Viewed 303 times
glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

Center, Overveiw.

Image
Attachments
T12_Axis_C..Overview.jpg
T12_Axis_C..Overview.jpg (777.47 KiB) Viewed 302 times
glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

Center Close-up.
He pushes NE, pushing in my Northern flank and at the same time takes a few forts of the Moscow line. Most combats go his way with heavy Soviet losses to moderate German losses. The most importan thing is I've gained a turn, without any encirclements.
Reinforcements are starting to arrive in good number again.

Image
Attachments
T12_Axis_Center_Zoom.jpg
T12_Axis_Center_Zoom.jpg (869.2 KiB) Viewed 302 times
glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

North Overview,
Not much going on North of Lake Ilmen. South of lake Ilmen, more attacks forcing me back.

Image
Attachments
T12_Axis_N..Overview.jpg
T12_Axis_N..Overview.jpg (675.4 KiB) Viewed 302 times
glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

After Sov moves. Center.
I decide to abandon Kaluga and man the Moscow defences. At least its South flank and part of the center. After much thought I decide to leave the Northen flank where it is. Part of the reason for staying, I spot what seems to be a Panzer Corps from PzG4 out of position for a move North for a Rhzev pocket and more poised for a move East to continue the offensive currently ongoing.

If that's true, a retreat at this time would be giving up territory for nothing and throwing away a potentially very good position for a counter attack on the flank later on. Hmmm, difficult choice but in the end I decide to stay. As a saveguard I shore up the North flank and add some depth. Railing in divisions from the Northern Front.

Positive news is that the Moscow defenses are getting into shape and I have some descent definsive stacks for him to tackle.

Image
Attachments
T12_Sov_Center_Zoom.jpg
T12_Sov_Center_Zoom.jpg (800.86 KiB) Viewed 302 times
glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

Center Overview

Image
Attachments
T12_Sov_Ce..Overview.jpg
T12_Sov_Ce..Overview.jpg (775.55 KiB) Viewed 302 times
glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

South close up.
There's no hope of counter attacking that stack next to Stalino. So I take up defensive positions as best as I can. These last 2 turns have been relatively easy on most of the Southern Armies, and most units have had a chance to rest and receive replacements, so all-in-all, I'm feeling reasonably secure and hoping for the best

Image
Attachments
T12_Sov_South_Zoom.jpg
T12_Sov_South_Zoom.jpg (668.12 KiB) Viewed 303 times
glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

And overview:

Image
Attachments
T12_Sov_So..Overview.jpg
T12_Sov_So..Overview.jpg (658.49 KiB) Viewed 302 times
glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

TURN 13

Center Overview, before Sov moves:
Dissaster strikes once more. 25 divisions are cut off and I totally misread and underestimated his mobility after weeks and weeks of movement and heavy attacks.
4 more turns to mud!

Image
Attachments
T13_Axis_C..Overview.jpg
T13_Axis_C..Overview.jpg (709.98 KiB) Viewed 303 times
glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

He pushes my stacks away like they're not there, opens a hole in the most vulnerable spot between the center and the North (or right flank) and exploits up to Torzhok in the North putting up an unpenetrable line of hexes and units. The Pz Corps I spotted last turn is indeed from PzG4, but after 2 turns of marching from North to Center, and starting reasonably far from the place it attacks, it has movement to spare to link up with PzG2&3 to complete the encirclement. The pocket is doomed.
And that is a big problem...

Image
Attachments
T13_Axis_Center_Zoom.jpg
T13_Axis_Center_Zoom.jpg (788.47 KiB) Viewed 305 times
User avatar
sillyflower
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 4:39 pm
Location: Back in Blighty

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by sillyflower »

I hate to say it, but this was classic error of a clump of units slightly too far forward with weak flanks and lacking depth. All in the face of massed armour units few of which were in a ZoC and hence likely to be mobile.

To his credit, SJ80 then made the most of it. The root cause was undoubtedly earlier high losses of units meaning you had the gap.
web exchange

Post: I am always fearful that when I put this game down on the table and people see the box-art they will think I am some kind of neo-Nazi

Reply: They already know you're a gamer. What other shame can possibly compare?
glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

In the South he crosses the Torets river just North of Gorlovka but he gets bogged down before penetrating in the operational depths. Even so, he now has the option to move NE or SE and both are not a happy prospect. SE means I could be pinned against the Black Sea without a harbor. NE, I could be pinned in between infantry not on this screenshot. Both times I risk losing a lot of good troops. Time to go.

Image
Attachments
T13_Axis_South_Zoom.jpg
T13_Axis_South_Zoom.jpg (720.6 KiB) Viewed 302 times
glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

ORIGINAL: sillyflower

I hate to say it, but this was classic error of a clump of units slightly too far forward with weak flanks and lacking depth. All in the face of massed armour units few of which were in a ZoC and hence likely to be mobile.

To his credit, SJ80 then made the most of it. The root cause was undoubtedly earlier high losses of units meaning you had the gap.

No worries, you're quite right. I took a gamble and it didn't pay off. But, not all is lost [;)]
In the end, it's just inevitable that the Russian is going to lose units during the summer. Should that not be the case we would never hear the end of it! [:D]
glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

South overview



Image
Attachments
T13_Sov_So..Overview.jpg
T13_Sov_So..Overview.jpg (570.04 KiB) Viewed 302 times
User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by Flaviusx »

3 panzer groups is just tough to stop, period. OTOH, I'd rather see them strike in the Rhzev-Kalinin area than east of Kaluga and cross the Oka.
WitE Alpha Tester
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4857
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by M60A3TTS »

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

3 panzer groups is just tough to stop, period. OTOH, I'd rather see them strike in the Rhzev-Kalinin area than east of Kaluga and cross the Oka.

I wouldn't rule out that possibility just yet either. With the northern defenses gone, Moscow is likely lost. You may have more units but no fort line to hold.
User avatar
sillyflower
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 4:39 pm
Location: Back in Blighty

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by sillyflower »

They weren't quite in the right place for that I suspect, but clearly same potential problem of empty running room + same cause down there too.
web exchange

Post: I am always fearful that when I put this game down on the table and people see the box-art they will think I am some kind of neo-Nazi

Reply: They already know you're a gamer. What other shame can possibly compare?
glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

After Soviet moves.
I fall back in the North to shorten the line and find troops to shift South to plug the gap.
NW front also falls back out of the Valdai and forms a new Northern flank together with remnants of whatever I can find.

There's one very important stroke of luck I have...a 22MP Cav division which can ZOC the weakest link he has in the line... a CV2 brackdown of a panzer division. [:'(]

Image
Attachments
T13_Sov_Ce..Overview.jpg
T13_Sov_Ce..Overview.jpg (669.01 KiB) Viewed 302 times
glvaca
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:42 pm

RE: 41-45GC GLVACA (Sov) v SJ80 (Axis) - NO SJ80

Post by glvaca »

Center, close up:
I can't believe my luck, the Cav division can get a zoc on that breakdown! 6 ground attack missions prepare the way for a desperate attack from inside the pocket. Success! The pocket has been re-openend!

Further East, I frantically try to buildup a new right flank and move in new riffiting units in the second line fully expecting I'll need that line very shortly. However, with the pocket openend, I might just have bought myself an extra turn. His Panzers MUST be low on fuel after such a sprint!

Image
Attachments
T13_Sov_Center_Zoom.jpg
T13_Sov_Center_Zoom.jpg (946.27 KiB) Viewed 302 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”