Bring me the head of Diego Garcia...and the Mayor of Addu Atoll too!

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by Cap Mandrake »

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Was the need to split Torpedoman's Mate Malarkey's evidence into two separate posts (#7118 and 7119) necessitated by a break in court proceedings to bring the "Observors" back to order and regain their equilibrium after the shocking revelations, or was it due to the well known Australian legal procedures of the time of always adjourning for lunch.

In any case, I think a relevant notation in the transcript would be appropriate.

Alfred
Observors:

There was an objection by the defence when it was discovered that the court reporter had spelled "Observers" wrong and then copy and pasted it twice even before copy and pasting had even been invented. [:D]

Also the JAG has a prostate problem.
Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by Cap Mandrake »

Heavy air losses. The loss of B-24's seems inflated but there were certainly many damaged planes. I took one squadron off line but we are going back today. This is war, after all.

Darwin runway damage at 29%.


I moved some F4F's to Gove to sweep over Darwin but some idiot forgot the drop tanks.

Most of the Zero losses were over PH and the Oscars over India.




Image
Attachments
untitled.jpg
untitled.jpg (69.35 KiB) Viewed 241 times
Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by Cap Mandrake »

Ready or not....

Image
Attachments
untitled.jpg
untitled.jpg (85.27 KiB) Viewed 242 times
Image
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5246
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by zuluhour »

Neato, I love hide and seek....[;)]
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

Ready or not....
Reminds me of a scene from "A Fistful of Dollars". The man with no name is proving himself alternatively to the Rojos and then the Baxters, showing his skills in a test of his benefactors to the highest dollar bidder for his services.

On one foray, he walks past a very happy undertaker. The man with no name has provided him with steady business. He strides past the undertaker, removes the stub of a cigar from his mouth and says, "get three coffins ready."

After the inevitable shootout goes horribly awry for the Baxters, four of them lie dead on the ground. The man with no name passes the undertaker whilest departing the scene. "My mistake. Four coffins.", he apologizes.

Seaborne invasion of Darwin? Better get an extra few ready.

I still don't understand why you don't come in by land from Katherine and parts South. That's your low cost option here, in my opinion.
Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by Cap Mandrake »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

Ready or not....
Reminds me of a scene from "A Fistful of Dollars". The man with no name is proving himself alternatively to the Rojos and then the Baxters, showing his skills in a test of his benefactors to the highest dollar bidder for his services.

On one foray, he walks past a very happy undertaker. The man with no name has provided him with steady business. He strides past the undertaker, removes the stub of a cigar from his mouth and says, "get three coffins ready."

After the inevitable shootout goes horribly awry for the Baxters, four of them lie dead on the ground. The man with no name passes the undertaker whilest departing the scene. "My mistake. Four coffins.", he apologizes.

Seaborne invasion of Darwin? Better get an extra few ready.

I still don't understand why you don't come in by land from Katherine and parts South. That's your low cost option here, in my opinion.

Because WE are the Eastwood character, that's why. [:)]

Besides, it's more fun. By ra way, we ARE coming in from Katherine. We have a Brit Div and about 4 Australian Armoured units 20 miles out. The idea is to trap LYB ground units and exterminate them in situ. We may also have temporary carrier superiority, their Bettys have been hammered...yada, yada, yada.

What could POSSIBLY go wrong?
Image
User avatar
sprior
Posts: 8294
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 11:38 pm
Location: Portsmouth, UK

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by sprior »

I still don't understand why you don't come in by land from Katherine and parts South

This is why:



Image
Attachments
on the road to K.jpg
on the road to K.jpg (35.12 KiB) Viewed 241 times
"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.

Image
User avatar
sprior
Posts: 8294
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 11:38 pm
Location: Portsmouth, UK

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by sprior »

Work in neonatal ICU

Having been a customer of a NICU you have my unreserved admiration (but I reserve the right to take the piss). I couldn't take the emotional battering.
"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.

Image
User avatar
sprior
Posts: 8294
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 11:38 pm
Location: Portsmouth, UK

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by sprior »

Besides, it's more fun.

Yep, if (when) we cock things up it's only electrons, unlike 30 years ago tomorrow when a bunch of 'tards decided my mates needed a trip down south.
"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.

Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by Cap Mandrake »

ORIGINAL: sprior
Besides, it's more fun.

Yep, if (when) we cock things up it's only electrons, unlike 30 years ago tomorrow when a bunch of 'tards decided my mates needed a trip down south.

Santa Maria! It's been 30 years? [X(]
Image
User avatar
sprior
Posts: 8294
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 11:38 pm
Location: Portsmouth, UK

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by sprior »

Yep and I remember every damned day. I was in Faslane the day Conqueror got home.
"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.

Image
Itdepends
Posts: 937
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:59 am

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by Itdepends »

That's a very large amphib taskforce. 88 ships? Hope they don't see combat (or collide during unloading).

Got any minesweepers in the op OOB?

Good ruck.
User avatar
khyberbill
Posts: 1941
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: new milford, ct

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by khyberbill »

Got any minesweepers in the op OOB?
It appears as if they have 88.
"Its a dog eat dog world Sammy and I am wearing Milkbone underwear" -Norm.
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

What could POSSIBLY go wrong?

I dunno. The mind boggles. Say, hypothetically, you could have 1 and 3 aircraft respectively in two of your air combat TFs. That would be a good place to start.

I only play the Japanese side in the CG, but I'm led to believe that it *is* more customary to put aircraft carriers of some sort in one's air combat TF. [:'(]
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

Because WE are the Eastwood character, that's why. [:)]

From a different Eastwood movie altogether:

Harry Callahan: Well, I just work for the city, Briggs!

Lieutenant Briggs: So do I, longer than you, and I never had to take my gun out of its holster once. I'm proud of that.

Harry Callahan: Well, you're a good man, lieutenant. A good man always knows his limitations...
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: sprior
I was in Faslane the day Conqueror got home.

How was life in (the) Faslane? Surely make you lose your mind? Everything-all the time?
Image
User avatar
Onime No Kyo
Posts: 16846
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 5:55 am

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by Onime No Kyo »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

What could POSSIBLY go wrong?

I dunno. The mind boggles. Say, hypothetically, you could have 1 and 3 aircraft respectively in two of your air combat TFs. That would be a good place to start.

I only play the Japanese side in the CG, but I'm led to believe that it *is* more customary to put aircraft carriers of some sort in one's air combat TF. [:'(]

Customs...bah! [:-]
"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by Cap Mandrake »

ORIGINAL: khyberbill
Got any minesweepers in the op OOB?
It appears as if they have 88.

Admiral Lord SPrior, Admiral Lord SPrior, they are making fun of us again!




We do have some YMS up ahead. They will refuel at Horn Is. We have a few DMS with the Death Star that could be broken off.


Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by Cap Mandrake »

ORIGINAL: Itdepends

That's a very large amphib taskforce. 88 ships? Hope they don't see combat (or collide during unloading).

Got any minesweepers in the op OOB?

Good ruck.

Yes, 88 ships is one TF is problematic but we are a bit short on escorts. We can break up the big Darwin landing group when the DD's and CL's at Merauke join up. We can also pick up some AM's along the way to use as escorts.


The biggest threat will not be mines but the LYB surface forces (Musahshi, Yamato and at least 3 CA's), Bettys from Wyndham and Timor and the carriers.
Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: With the Wren Detachment

Post by Cap Mandrake »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

What could POSSIBLY go wrong?

I dunno. The mind boggles. Say, hypothetically, you could have 1 and 3 aircraft respectively in two of your air combat TFs. That would be a good place to start.

I only play the Japanese side in the CG, but I'm led to believe that it *is* more customary to put aircraft carriers of some sort in one's air combat TF. [:'(]

Yes, I saw that too. I'm not sure what the problem is...probably a stack overflow for the 64 bit processor because we have so many planes.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”