Empire of the Rising Lemon? SqzMyLemon (Japan) v Smeulders (Allies)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
SqzMyLemon
Posts: 4239
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

RE: Feb. 23/43 Update

Post by SqzMyLemon »

The next turn is away. I think the small enemy SCTF's I'm spotting in the Coral Sea and Solomons are maneuvering to get into a position to strike my ASW TF's protecting the sea lane for bombardment runs against Lunga. I've taken appropriate measures and hopefully I've deduced things right. I've kept a few expendable TF's operating in the area to draw the DD's in. There could be a few sunk enemy DD's this turn if the Allies do indeed strike. The situation has changed dramatically since their last attempt and if they get caught within range of LBA...well.

Another bombardment run is ordered against Lunga regardless, as the airbase is down to only 53% damage. Advance Japanese units are 21 miles away from Lunga, but have been slowed to allow late landing forces to catch up. I'm still on schedule for an assault during the first week in March. I will be stepping up bombardments now and may use CV's to pound Lunga as well. It's all about shock and awe now in preparation for the assault.

China, I've ordered the armour to race for Kunming. I'll try and catch the "Other Horde" and nip away as much as possible. All forces in China continue to advance, but I continue to pull units out of the line for eventual redeployment to the Pacific.

Could be an interesting turn, but that all depends on what the Allies do. I just hope to start getting positive results from my naval forces for a change and I'm sweet talking Mother Nature for all it's worth. Give me interdictions and clear skies if the Allies attack.

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Feb. 23/43 Update

Post by JocMeister »

He is done for in China, no doubt about it! He won´t have any supply at all. Probably havn´t had for a few months.
Image
User avatar
SqzMyLemon
Posts: 4239
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

RE: Feb. 23/43 Update

Post by SqzMyLemon »

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

He is done for in China, no doubt about it! He won´t have any supply at all. Probably havn´t had for a few months.

I sure hope you are right. I've heard that even when out of supply, a unit still retains 25% of its combat strength though. I think Alfred posted that somewhere. If so, that means these large Chinese formations will still have some decent defensive capability. More so if Kunming is reached and 3x terrain and fort levels come into play. It's going to be interesting finding out.
Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Feb. 23/43 Update

Post by ny59giants »

How many DBs (hopefully Judy) do you have in the Solomons area?? With their extended range they should do well against any DDs he sends in. [;)] It may be worth taking off a groups or two from your CVs to make this a costly adventure for him.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
SqzMyLemon
Posts: 4239
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

RE: Feb. 23/43 Update

Post by SqzMyLemon »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

How many DBs (hopefully Judy) do you have in the Solomons area?? With their extended range they should do well against any DDs he sends in. [;)] It may be worth taking off a groups or two from your CVs to make this a costly adventure for him.

I have one Judy formation and that is located on the CV Taiho. Despite the D4Y1 Judy being advanced one month, it seems I'm unable to actually produce it until March 1/43. The factories still show as R&D and are blue, so I'm not sure if I have to do something or if they will start producing on the 1st.

I have one DB unit on Munda and a TB unit on Vella Lavella. Also Betty's on Shortlands. I'm just waiting for more airbase expansions to get more LBA deployed. Kb might also be a factor [8D]. I've taken off one air unit each from the CV's Junyo and Hiyo, as I wanted more Zero's available for CAP. These bomber groups are at Truk and Manus.

One interesting bit. I remember the time it takes to buy back destroyed air groups has been shortened in recent patches, but it requires a restart to take effect. I bought back the CV Hiryu air groups shortly after it's sinking and I'm still waiting. In fact, they will not arrive till July! [X(] That is well over a year long delay. The CVL Ryuho was accelerated and it's air groups don't arrive till November.

The enemy DD's are already within Betty range from Shortlands. I'm just not getting co-operation from the weather, or getting bombers airborne in some cases. This is what's killing me. I'm usually in a position to hit the Allies, just the results are poor or weather comes into play. Last turn was a perfect example, the SCTF I sent to interdict the enemy SCTF in the Coral Sea reacted to it, the message TF so and so encountered enemy TF so and so came up, but no combat occurred. The CVL Ryuho was within range, the Kate's launched, but couldn't locate the enemy due to weather. This kind of stuff is happening to me far too often.
Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)
User avatar
SqzMyLemon
Posts: 4239
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

A note on R&D

Post by SqzMyLemon »

I forgot to add this to the last turn update. I noticed my Ki-84 Frank R&D seemed to be forever stuck at 111 points to repair and was wondering at the slow progress. Then I noticed two points have repaired in the last two days. I wondered why and remembered Criptop mentioning how airframe R&D was somehow speeded up after a certain number of engines for that particular airframe had been pooled. So I took a look at the Ha-45 and sure enough, I've recently surpassed 300 engines in the pool. It seems at least 300 engines stockpiled is a catalyst to speed up R&D. This isn't scientific by any means and I may be completely wrong, but at least I'm getting some Frank airframe R&D happening. I will continue to watch the numbers and see if it continues or if it was simply an aberration.
Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)
Walloc
Posts: 3143
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:04 am
Location: Denmark

RE: A note on R&D

Post by Walloc »

Pretty sure both Damien and MichaelM confirmed that u need 500 engines in pool to get research bonus, so i think u just seeing randomness. U have had enough supplies at the bases right?

Kind regards,

Rasmus
User avatar
SqzMyLemon
Posts: 4239
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

RE: A note on R&D

Post by SqzMyLemon »

ORIGINAL: Walloc

Pretty sure both Damien and MichaelM confirmed that u need 500 engines in pool to get research bonus, so i think u just seeing randomness. U have had enough supplies at the bases right?

Kind regards,

Rasmus

Thanks Rasmus. I gained another repair point last turn, so I'll continue to enjoy it while it lasts. I'm producing 130 Ha-45's a month, so the good news is I'll reach the magic 500 in two months.
Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)
User avatar
SqzMyLemon
Posts: 4239
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

China and other stuff

Post by SqzMyLemon »

I had a chance to run a turn this morning and bad news in China. Recon picked up a four unit Chinese force of 17k already at the crossroads east of Kunming. I don't believe I'll be strong enough, or have the time to dislodge this force before the "Horde" arrives. There's no point risking the trashing of my armour units for no gain. I'll have to rethink things. Plan B is consolidate Kwieyang and Kienko while marching on Chengtu and Chungking. I have a plan in mind to counter the Chinese massing at Kunming, but that is for later.

Here's some good news in China. Chungking appears to be held by only four units, but the forts will be minimum level 6. It will still be costly to take the base, but there's no rush and I can grind it down prior to an assault. I will mop up enemy forces around Kienko while still keeping pressure on both "Hordes", looking to exploit any chance of whittling down their numbers.

In the Solomons the small enemy SCTF's have withdrawn and Bart commented on the effective Japanese search of late. I've made a real effort to improve this and it's paying off.

My bombardment TF ran into a glitch today. They did not conduct a night operation, but bombarded Lunga at the end of the day phase, where they still remain. The results were poor as spotting Pete's were set to night, not day. Luckily, there were no enemy LBA strikes against the TF. I haven't changed anything, including the staging point, so it just shows you never know what will happen. My CV's also did not reach their appointed patrol zone either and were spotted at Shortlands.

I received two 11600 tonne capacity tankers today which will help things enormously. I'm accelerating every large tanker I can and currently running a daily 1000 merchant point deficit. I'm not sweating it, as I can run at this level for almost two months in order to reduce the merchant shipping pool. I'm banking roughly 5.5k HI daily and just surpassed 900k in the pool. If all goes according to plan I'll reach 1,000,000 by the end of March.
Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)
User avatar
SqzMyLemon
Posts: 4239
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

A question?

Post by SqzMyLemon »

I have a question about naval bombardments in contested hexes. I've seen from my other game that friendly troops are often targeted as much as enemy troops are, when conducting supporting naval bombardments. Am I doing something wrong or is this always a risk you take? I ask because I'm concerned about whacking my own troops prior to planned ground assaults against Lunga. Am I better served hammering Lunga prior to my ground forces arriving or stick to the plan of supporting bombardment attacks coinciding with same day as ground assaults and risk my own troops being hit as well?

What have others experienced in terms of their own troops getting hit by supporting naval bombardments?
Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)
User avatar
SqzMyLemon
Posts: 4239
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

Off topic - models again

Post by SqzMyLemon »

The Spouse is talking smack about our model bet, so I'm determined to finish up the Cromwell IV this week and hopefully will have pictures for you on Monday. I'll probably mount it on a base for the model show, but that may take a little more time yet. Next up will be to finish the Ki-46-IIIa Dinah.

She'll also be out of town for 5 days in a few weeks, so I'll use that time to crank up the production. She poked the bear once too often this time. That free steak dinner is going to taste mighty fine. [8D]

Off course, I''ll have to pay in other ways so really this is more for pride than anything else. I've never lost a bet to her yet. [:D]
Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Off topic - models again

Post by ny59giants »

Off course, I''ll have to pay in other ways so really this is more for pride than anything else. I've never lost a bet to her yet. [:D]

Can I quote you on this and I need to have her cell phone number to verify your claim.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
SqzMyLemon
Posts: 4239
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

Bombardments

Post by SqzMyLemon »

No comments on the bombardment question? I'll just see what happens then and go from there.

There won't be a turn today and work is deadsville. It's going to be a long 7 more hours. [:(]

Looking over the map yesterday, I notice that my submarines patrolling off the east coast of Australia are not being detected from air search. I wonder if the Allies are just concentrating on forward areas instead. The reason I mention this is because a few of my TF's operating in the Coral Sea were not detected, this opens the possiblity for a raid in some form perhaps. The only problem is my submarines aren't locating anything worth raiding. [:D]

Fuel is an issue at Rabaul again and more is on the way. Balikpapan is dry though and I've begun using Soerabaja as a secondary source. Some components of my merchant fleet reorganization have yet to reach their new ports, so this is just a temporary problem.

Otherwise, everything is in motion, and I just have to be patient until it's time to strike against Lunga. We are about 8-10 days away now.
Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)
Walloc
Posts: 3143
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:04 am
Location: Denmark

RE: Bombardments

Post by Walloc »

Just to clarify on the engine research bonus. I wont claim to be an expert on the subject, but well since it seems Damian confirmed the 500 engine part i think ill press my luck one more time. The 500 engine research bonus as i understand it applies not to speed up the repair of R&D factories, but adds a bonus atop on the normal lvl of a fully repaired factory. So it "produce" more research than with out the 500 engine, but it wont kick in until factories are functioning. Which they arent until they are fully repaired. For example a 30 factory would with out the 500 engines give 1 point/"plane" per day, but with the 500 engines in pool its points 2 per day or double up, which is pretty significant. Ofc it wont be as significant with a larger factory as is in the case of the large frank factory. Tho any bit helps, +1 is still +1.

Kind regards,

Rasmus
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: Bombardments

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: Walloc

Just to clarify on the engine research bonus. I wont claim to be an expert on the subject, but well since it seems Damian confirmed the 500 engine part i think ill press my luck one more time. The 500 engine research bonus as i understand it applies not to speed up the repair of R&D factories, but adds a bonus atop on the normal lvl of a fully repaired factory. So it "produce" more research than with out the 500 engine, but it wont kick in until factories are functioning. Which they arent until they are fully repaired. For example a 30 factory would with out the 500 engines give 1 point/"plane" per day, but with the 500 engines in pool its points 2 per day or double up, which is pretty significant. Ofc it wont be as significant with a larger factory as is in the case of the large frank factory. Tho any bit helps, +1 is still +1.

Kind regards,

Rasmus

So more factories would be better, as it would be 1 point/day per factory? Is that right?

And on another note, about those models ... any pics?
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
Walloc
Posts: 3143
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:04 am
Location: Denmark

RE: Bombardments

Post by Walloc »

ORIGINAL: obvert

ORIGINAL: Walloc

Just to clarify on the engine research bonus. I wont claim to be an expert on the subject, but well since it seems Damian confirmed the 500 engine part i think ill press my luck one more time. The 500 engine research bonus as i understand it applies not to speed up the repair of R&D factories, but adds a bonus atop on the normal lvl of a fully repaired factory. So it "produce" more research than with out the 500 engine, but it wont kick in until factories are functioning. Which they arent until they are fully repaired. For example a 30 factory would with out the 500 engines give 1 point/"plane" per day, but with the 500 engines in pool its points 2 per day or double up, which is pretty significant. Ofc it wont be as significant with a larger factory as is in the case of the large frank factory. Tho any bit helps, +1 is still +1.

Kind regards,

Rasmus

So more factories would be better, as it would be 1 point/day per factory? Is that right?

And on another note, about those models ... any pics?

Well it has been determained other place, by Damien and MichaelM notes that the sweet spot for R&D factories are 30. The higher u get above 30 the less u get out of it in added value. My assumtion and underling its an assumption is that, that plays into what the bonus u get from the engine research bonus which would be adjusted to that. I was thinking about asking Damian in a PM if he had seen the same and could confirm it. Hasnt gotten around ot that yet.
So in that yes more factories of 30 is better than one bigger one of X number of 30. Each of those 30 ones would get +1 as i understand it. Problem in this particular case of the frank a is that u start with 1 bigger one from start, the 55 one. It would have been better with 2 30 ones, but nothing to do about that in this particular case.

Kind regards,

Rasmus
User avatar
SqzMyLemon
Posts: 4239
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

RE: Bombardments

Post by SqzMyLemon »

ORIGINAL: obvert

And on another note, about those models ... any pics?

Hoping to have some pics after the weekend. Very little model time this week as I actually spent time catching up on some programs PVR'd. I'm up to date on "Game of Thrones" and finally watched the Bahrain Formula 1 Grand Prix. The plan is still to get the Cromwell almost finished and get cracking on the rest of the Dinah.

I'm also getting over the almost annilhilation of a JAAF Bn. at Magwe from Allied bombers last turn. It's definitely discouraging knowing air superiority is going to be so decisively in favour of the Allies. It looks like Bart is going to take a page out of General William Slim's book and flank Magwe from the S.W. in Burma. Not sure what I can do to stop that short of withdrawal.

The force in China covering the crossroads to Kunming is now 5 units of 40k+ so the armour will be ordered to turn around.

A discouraging turn with big implications. Burma is worrisome and most likely will see some intense fighting soon as I try and figure out what to do to stop the Allies.
Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Bombardments

Post by JocMeister »

A screenshot of Burma would be great! :)
Image
User avatar
SqzMyLemon
Posts: 4239
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

An update

Post by SqzMyLemon »

It's been three turns since I've updated so here we go.

Feb. 24/43:

Sub Ops:

SS Silversides is spotted by DD Sagiri near Babeldoab. DD Sagiri is on the way to Manilla for repairs and launches no ASW attack.

China:

The "Horde" is bombed for 2(28) infantry, 1(45) non-combat, 0(3) engineer squads and 1(2) guns lost totalling 691 casualties.

The "Other Horde" is bombed for 0(5) infantry and 0(4) non-combat squads lost totalling 81 casualties. That makes another 750k or so to go. [:D]

The Solomons:

Sally's (23) bomb Lunga for 1 runway Hit. [8|]

Naval bombardment of Lunga was SNAFU'd today as the BB's ended up hitting the base during the day phase, and remained exposed at the base the entire day. Results were poor, amounting to only 0(9) infantry, 0(11) non-combat and 0(1) engineer squad losses totalling 107 casualties. No Pete's spotted as they were set to night time operations.

Miscellaneous:

Japan:

Tulagi expands fortifications to size 1

DD Mikazuki beginning refit in shipyard at Soerabaja
Ryujo-1 converting to A6M3a Zero

TK Otowasan Maru arrives at Fukuoka
TK Asashio Maru arrives at Fukuoka

63rd Sentai arrives at Kagoshima (Nate Sentai, will immediately upgrade to Ki-43-IIa Oscar's)

Allied:

Nothing:

Feb. 25/43:

Burma:

Allied air power made a special guest appearance today in force. Magwe was swept by five waves of fighters consisting of P-40K Warhawk's (123) with roughly 25 aircraft in each sweep. There was no Japanese CAP [8D]. I'll pick my battles. Allied bombers followed (Blenheim's, Mitchell's and Wellington's) and hit the 94th JAAF AF Bn. hard. Losses are 6(10) infantry, 6(68) non-combat and 0(3) engineer squads lost for 651 casualties. Oucho and a glimpse of things to come. [:(]

China:

Chinese troops near Kienko are bombed for 1(35) infantry, 0(23) non-combat and 0(2) engineer squads losses totalling 432 casualties.

The "Other Horde" near Kweiyang was bombed and suffered 0(8) infantry, 0(8) non-combat squads lost totalling 122 casualties.

The "Horde" near Chungking was spared today as weather grounded the bombers.

The Solomons:

Lunga was bombed with better results today as another bomber Sentai has arrived from China. Ki-21-IIb Sally's (35) damaged the base with 2 AB and 23 Runway hits. Much better.

Another bombardment of Lunga was conducted by the same bombardment TF as yesterday. I figured since they were still there they might as well empty the magazines. Damage was negligible at 0(2) engineer squads disrupted for 7 casualites. I even ordered the two DD's escorts to shell the base, but to little effect. Both Pete's spotted though. [:D]

In other news, two Allied DD's moved near Ontong-Java and within 9 hexes of Kate's based at Vella Lavella. Unfortunately, due to range the Kate's (20) were reduced to carrying bombs and scored no hits.

Miscellaneous:

Japan:

Etorofu expands airfield to size 1
Shortlands expands fortifications to size 4

Allied:

Nothing

Feb. 26/43:

Sub Ops:

SS Shad is located by E Shimushu near Ponape. No ASW attack.

Burma:

No enemy sweeps or bombers appear today, but Bhamo is bombarded by ground troops today. AAR follows:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Bhamo (63,44)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 27015 troops, 572 guns, 652 vehicles, Assault Value = 963

Defending force 27694 troops, 279 guns, 136 vehicles, Assault Value = 934

Japanese ground losses:
11 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
26 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Assaulting units:
6th Australian Division
2nd British Division

Defending units:
19th Division
5th Division
21st Fld AA Gun Co
53rd Const Co
9th RF Gun Battalion

China:

The "Other Horde" near Kunming is bombed for 0(1) infantry and 0(2) non-combat squad losses totalling 23 casualties.

Once again weather impacts my bombing operations. No enemy troops are bombed in Central China. That's two days in a row the "Horde" has been spared.

The Solomons:

Lunga is again bombed by Sally's (28) and the base suffers 2 AB and 2 Runway hits. [8|]

The big boys are called in again and Lunga is hit by another night time naval bombardment. AAR follows:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Lunga at 114,138

Japanese Ships
BB Musashi
BB Yamato

Allied Ships
AK Alcyon, Shell hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Allied ground losses:
299 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 23 destroyed, 12 disabled
Engineers: 3 destroyed, 3 disabled
Guns lost 3 (1 destroyed, 2 disabled)
Vehicles lost 12 (5 destroyed, 7 disabled)

Airbase hits 6
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 19
Port hits 1
Port supply hits 1

BB Musashi firing at Lunga
F1M2 Pete acting as spotter for BB Yamato
BB Yamato firing at 27th Infantry Division

Much better. Support squads are consistently suffering high loss when the bombardments get good results.

Allied DD's snooping around Ontong-Java last turn are not spotted today. I ordered a few small SCTF's to try for an intercept, but the Allied ships slipped away.

Miscellaneous:

Japan:

Sabang expands fortifications to size 4
Madjene expands fortifications to size 3
Rambutyo expands airfield to size 3

Allied:

Nothing

Thoughts:

I've moved additional fighters forward in Burma and will contest the skies if the Allies appear tomorrow. If so, the Ki-61-Ia Tony will makes its combat debut. I've layered my CAP from 12k (Nick's) to 25k (Tojo's) let's see what happens, if anything.

In China, I'm still advancing and waiting on troops to move up. I will split off the Japanese 1st Army to march on Chungking, the 11th, 13th and 23rd Armies will march on Kunming and area. Armour is ordered to Central China where I hope to catch the Chinese in clear terrain. Paratroops will assault Neikiang. A Shock Attack is ordered against a small Chinese LCU S.W. of Chungking by a Division and Mixed Ind. Bde. Hopefully all bombers will fly today.

I'm not sure what the Allies are up to in the Solomons, but these small SCTF's are either probing for a weakness or testing my naval search capability. Bart has mentioned before about how often he's spotted now. With that in mind, I showed KB today east of Shortlands. If the Allies are thinking of doing something, then KB is ready and willing and I want the Allies to know it's there for a reason. Japanese bombardment missions will cease for a few days and once the Yamato and Musashi are rearmed and refueled, all SCTF's will rendezvous at Shortlands. The amphibious TF's will mass and escorts will be assigned. Ground troops are 12 miles from Lunga and it's almost time. The plan is one massive naval bombardment before they reach Lunga and then start landing another division and the supporting LCU's. The first assault will occur when all troops reach Lunga overland and are unloaded from the transports. In a matter of days, I should be able to mount another naval bombardment and the first assault will go ahead. If the Allies do try to interfere, they'll be facing most of the Combined Fleet. All Japanese naval air is now set to naval strike missions and more Betty's will be deployed instead of the army bombers.

Go hard or go home.

Stay tuned...

I'll post some screenshots if I get chance to later. Burma and perhaps China.
Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: An update

Post by obvert »

What altitude are you bombing from over Lunga? Seems low for hits if the groups are trained up and in good spirits.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”