ideal amphibious tf?

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
jeffk3510
Posts: 4143
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:59 am
Location: Kansas

RE: ideal amphibious tf?

Post by jeffk3510 »

ORIGINAL: kevin_hx
ORIGINAL: jeffk3510

...and then.. get them ashore!!

Image

Nice game.
I played it eight years ago.

As did I.... just a screenshot I found. Haven't played it in years.
Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.
User avatar
derhexer
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:04 am

RE: ideal amphibious tf?

Post by derhexer »

Encircled posted about an amphib invasion to reatke Bake Island,
"Having read all this with interest, I need to ask the following question

Is that too tough a cookie to crack in May 1942 "

Depends on what the Allies have loaded, what the Japanese have on Baker Island and how long they've been there.

But, it is a good gamble for the Allies. If the Japanese can put long range bombers on Baker Island, they can do a good job of interdicting shipping between PH and the South Pacific, as well as use Baker to support taking Canton Island.

I'd move my carriers southeast of Baker. The Japanese can stage GM bombers out of the Marianas and these can devestate your carriers.



Chris
(Did you ever stop to think and forget to start?)
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: ideal amphibious tf?

Post by JWE »

ORIGINAL: Encircled
This, plus most of my navy!

I'm guessing its a bit too tough
Dunno. Might could work. Give it a shot. It is only a game, after all. No medals (or executions) for success (or failure) except those given out by your peers.

I usually put in a couple days preparation bombardment by the biggest stuff I can get my hands on. If it's late enough in the war, I'll have some CVL/CVEs doing ground support. I divide my CV TFs so some AirGroups support the landing while others play goalkeeper a bit outside the box. A little bit of difference in patrol and react options.

Also have 2 SCTFs supporting the BBs and CVs. Those each have their own internal support, but SCTFs are good for reaction. Not often realized, but 2 SCTFs have 2 bites at the react apple, and if one goes, the other soon follows. So ...

A BB TF, couple of CV TFs, couple of SCTFs, an assault TF, a second-wave TF, phased supply TFs. All in one big week long operation. Just like how it was done, yeah?
User avatar
Encircled
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Northern England

RE: ideal amphibious tf?

Post by Encircled »

Got all that, except the second wave.

I've got enough units prepped, so I'll get one organised and go for it
User avatar
vettim89
Posts: 3746
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 11:38 pm
Location: Toledo, Ohio

RE: ideal amphibious tf?

Post by vettim89 »

Baker island is a Vsmall atoll which means if the intel is accurate, the Japanese have already overstacked it. If true, supplies may already be an issue for the garrison. Smack it a couple of days with some Old BBs and it might fall. Operative word in that sentence is "might"
"We have met the enemy and they are ours" - Commodore O.H. Perry
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: ideal amphibious tf?

Post by JWE »

ORIGINAL: Encircled
Got all that, except the second wave.

I've got enough units prepped, so I'll get one organised and go for it
Looks as though you have the concept well in hand, Encircled. All that remains is to tighten the sphincter and commit.

But watch out for stobor. [8D]
User avatar
Encircled
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Northern England

RE: ideal amphibious tf?

Post by Encircled »

Well, I captured it!

Thanks for all the advice!
User avatar
Gridley380
Posts: 464
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:24 pm

RE: ideal amphibious tf?

Post by Gridley380 »

ORIGINAL: JWE

But watch out for stobor.

No worries - they're on another planet.

Though I'd check to make sure none of your LCUs are commanded by a "Walker, R.".
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”