Barbarossa, a changed plan, Tauroggen vs. Alex

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

Tauroggen
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:48 pm

RE: Barbarossa, a changed plan, Tauroggen vs. Alex

Post by Tauroggen »

turn 24.
t25 will be blizzard time
When I look back at my summer campaign, it is a desaster.

My main mistakes

- I did not protect the rail supply lines enough.
I do not know what went wrong, as I immediately manned newly conquered cities.
Maybe Agame's promoting (by air supply) of soviet partisans had an impact.

- I did not do HQ-buildups in the offensive for Moscow (and Leningrad),
partly because of broken rail lines (2 times in front of Moscow,
it took 2-3 turns to repair each time), partly because I moved so fast forward
in North and Center that my HQs could not do build-ups.

So my opponent lured me - unintentionally, as I believe -
into moving too fast forward to be able to make HQ-buildups.
Two beginners struggling who makes the bigger mistakes...
I won this struggle, I think. Maybe because the German side is harder to master.

Having reached Borodino, which is 7 hexes from Moscow,
at the end of turn 8 (August 7th) and then not being able to take Moscow, is a shame.
Having reached the southern bank of the Neva at the end of turn 8
and then in 9 not attacking the backdoor ist a big mistake also, but I took Leningrad.
I should have regrouped Panzergruppe 4 earlier to Moscow though.

On the other hand Agame put all his efforts very early in defending Moscow.
He had built a deep defense with several lines of 2-3 fortifications.
I should have crushed or envelopped these lines.
As I could not, he preserved much of his army.
I now, at the end of t 24, face a Soviet Army that will soon be beyond 6 million men.


Image
Attachments
U1.gif
U1.gif (457.98 KiB) Viewed 175 times
Tauroggen
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:48 pm

RE: Barbarossa, a changed plan, Tauroggen vs. Alex

Post by Tauroggen »

I certainly used my Panzerdivisions not to the limit, giving them more rest than the German player can afford.
This leaves me with lower casualties and more reserves than "usual", but the price is a soviet army that also had lower losses.
I hold a line Volckov-Demjansk-Torzhok-Rhzev-Vjazma-Orel-Kharkov-Stalino which is ok, but I will not be able to hold because of the soviet troop numbers that will soon hit my lines.

Losses for Axis and Soviets are certainly lower than "normal."

Any comments? Suggestions, hints, corrections?


Image
Attachments
v1.gif
v1.gif (498.88 KiB) Viewed 175 times
notenome
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:07 pm

RE: Barbarossa, a changed plan, Tauroggen vs. Alex

Post by notenome »

Well you could have taken more terrain but the panzerwaffe is in fairly spectacular shape, as is the Wehrmacht. You have more than enough troops to do a strong blizzard defense (a lot of AARs out there showing how to do so) and then go for a 42 knock out blow.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”