O.T. War in the Atlantic

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

shoopzee
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 3:07 am
Location: Halifax, Canada

O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by shoopzee »

What do you think of a "Battle of the Atlantic" version of the game design? I know that the scale might have to be adjusted; but the more I play this game (and greatly enjoy it, I do) I find myself wondering what it would be like defending or attacking the Atlantic supply lines on this kind of scale.

Maybe a better name could be, "Wolfpack." any opinions? Just curious.
Commander Stormwolf
Posts: 1623
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:11 pm

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by Commander Stormwolf »


could be pretty easy to mod

already there is a "War in the West" mod being made by Dali

also there was a WITP: War in Russia Mod for witp original
"No Enemy Survives Contact with the Plan" - Commander Stormwolf
jazman
Posts: 369
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:03 am
Location: Crush Depth

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by jazman »

You're talking about a much longer game, but completely lost by Axis by middle of 1943.

In the Atlantic it's all about the convoys. According to Clay Blair's "Hitler's U-Boat War", it was hopeless for the Germans from the start. Yeah, you shove your convoys across the Atlantic and lose some ships. Every now and then you shove a convoy up to Murmansk, and lose some ships. The Med might be interesting, because you have to shove a convoy through Luftwaffe / Regia Aeronautica opposition.
BS, MS, PhD, WitP:AE, WitE, WitW
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by Dili »

If the Germans had snorkel at begin instead of in last stages of war it was far from hopless. In WW2 submarines were in surface mostly and vulnerable.
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6421
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by JeffroK »

ORIGINAL: jazman

You're talking about a much longer game, but completely lost by Axis by middle of 1943.

In the Atlantic it's all about the convoys. According to Clay Blair's "Hitler's U-Boat War", it was hopeless for the Germans from the start. Yeah, you shove your convoys across the Atlantic and lose some ships. Every now and then you shove a convoy up to Murmansk, and lose some ships. The Med might be interesting, because you have to shove a convoy through Luftwaffe / Regia Aeronautica opposition.
But we have a fine game where the japanese had no chance from the start!!

I think it would be a good game, I had lots of fun with the old SPI Wolfpack.

IFF the Kriegsmarine sank enough shipping, didnt get on the radio for everything including birthdays thereby allowing HuffDuff & Enigma to track them etc etc etc .
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
danlongman
Posts: 584
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:36 pm
Location: Over the hills and far away

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by danlongman »

The Med campaign was long and hard fought, generally ignored by peeps in the US because the Pacific was THE USN's war.
I think it would make a most interesting game especially if it were broadened to include a detailed North African and Balkans campaign on land.
Regia Maria and the Royal Navy sparred for two and a half years with lots of air/land/sea stuff going on until shortly after Italy left the Axis.
There were epic battles like Cape Matapan and the Malta convoys. Lots of special forces actions both British and Italian. The USN and the Vichy French Navy got in near the end.
If somebody made a decent game on this I would buy it in a minute. There was a game called "Bomb Alley" back in prehistory but I only saw adds for it, never had a copy.
cheers
"Patriotism: Your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." - George Bernard Shaw
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by Dili »

Mediterranean is the most difficult game to do. Air, Naval , Land plus special forces - that destroyed about 100 aircrafts(LRDG) and sunk 2 battleships and an heavy cruiser(X Flotilla), (there was also an Italian cruiser being finished sunk by the British late war copy of X Flotilla) plus several merchants need to be done well.

No one in this industry ever made a game with air, land a naval warfare well done at same time.
It is mostly 1 done well and the others 2 - to not even talk about SOF - hacked, bumbled. The best like WITP only pull 2 of 3(4 with SOF): Air and Naval
jakla1027
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:01 pm
Location: Idaho

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by jakla1027 »

Somebody with the know how please oh please take up building this MOD!!![:D]
User avatar
Shellshock
Posts: 573
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: U.S.

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by Shellshock »

ORIGINAL: Dili

If the Germans had snorkel at begin instead of in last stages of war it was far from hopless. In WW2 submarines were in surface mostly and vulnerable.

Snorkels were an expedient to aid a U-Boat's survival in an ocean dominated by Allied aircraft. They were hardly useful for the sort of wolfpack tactics that Doenitz desired. A U-boat running submerged with a snorkel raised was limited to six knots to avoid breaking the tube, and its sound-detection gear was useless with the loud diesel engines running. A U-Boat running with a snorkel was deaf, dumb and worse yet, noisy. Most dramatically, snorkels were equipped with automatic valves to prevent seawater from being sucked into the diesels, but when these valves slammed shut the engines would draw air from the boat itself before shutting down, causing a partial vacuum which was extremely painful to the ears of the crew and sometimes even ruptured eardrums making life miserable for the crew.

Commander Stormwolf
Posts: 1623
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:11 pm

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by Commander Stormwolf »


german submarines were basically unchanged since WW1, and they were pretty good at grinding it out against allied ships, and they built a large number of subs, so that was quite good for them

in an AE experimental mod I did once to test different designs, it was determined:

1) the best defence against ASW patrol planes is a float fighter on CAP above the submarine

2) the best defence against ASW ships, is a decoy midget sub to absorb 50% of the asw attacks


for next generation concepts, japanese submarines were a lot more advanced

a japanese wolfpack of carrier submarines can defend itself with float fighters, launch torpedo planes to attack convoys, use midget subs to distract enemy ASW or attack ports, and fire Typ95 torpedoes and Kaitens from long range

if yamamoto lived, they would have built 20 or so SenToku or just more AM class submarines,
would have been a real pain for allied convoys in 1944/1945
"No Enemy Survives Contact with the Plan" - Commander Stormwolf
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: jazman

You're talking about a much longer game, but completely lost by Axis by middle of 1943.
Warspite1

Pacific War December 41 - August 45 = almost 4 years and lost to the Axis in June 42 (6 months) if indeed it was not lost on day 1.

Battle of the Atlantic September 39 - May 45 = almost 6 years and lost to the Axis March 1943 (I assume you are taking the battles for convoy SC122 and HX229 as the climax of that battle) (3.5 years).

In my opinion, for what its worth, the appeal of the Pacific War is that if you are interested in the naval war you get to "play" with great carrier fleets and their aircraft, the biggest battleships (Iowas and Yamatos etc), the heavy cruiser engagements etc etc. The Pacific 1941/1942 is just so interesting - ABDA, The Indian Ocean Raid, Coral Sea, Midway, the whole Guadalcanal campaign - I love reading about this period.

That said, in response to the OP, yes I would love a properly done Battle of the Atlantic game. Depends how its done but it could be an excellent game and of course would present a very different, but nonetheless interesting game, compared to WITP-AE.

However, my greatest wish would be for a properly done Meditteranean War game. How easily that could be done I don't know given the problems that some of the other posters have mentioned - but for a balanced game where there is a real possibility of either side winning - then the Med certainly provides this.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Historiker
Posts: 4742
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:11 pm
Location: Deutschland

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by Historiker »

I have worked extensively on my war in the west mod for witp.

To make the game playable, you have to change a few things. England must totally rely on imports, so that every ship sunk is worth a lot. You might adjust the cargo size of freighters to give them more value, make ASW weaker, give germany's FW-200 more range or power...

You might also give Germany the chance to lay down ships by herself and decide which ships to build by using the conversion option intelligent...

There is a way to make this scenario attractive, but you have to adjust the scenario to the AE engine, not AE to the scenario.
Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: Commander Stormwolf


german submarines were basically unchanged since WW1, and they were pretty good at grinding it out against allied ships, and they built a large number of subs, so that was quite good for them

in an AE experimental mod I did once to test different designs, it was determined:

1) the best defence against ASW patrol planes is a float fighter on CAP above the submarine

2) the best defence against ASW ships, is a decoy midget sub to absorb 50% of the asw attacks


for next generation concepts, japanese submarines were a lot more advanced

a japanese wolfpack of carrier submarines can defend itself with float fighters, launch torpedo planes to attack convoys, use midget subs to distract enemy ASW or attack ports, and fire Typ95 torpedoes and Kaitens from long range

if yamamoto lived, they would have built 20 or so SenToku or just more AM class submarines,
would have been a real pain for allied convoys in 1944/1945


you can mod whatever you want but keep our eyes from this BS if you try to make it sound realistic

float fighters defending submarines and torpedo bombers attacking convoys, this is even sillier than your Emily fantasy or the other crap you want to sell as realism or what if history
User avatar
Historiker
Posts: 4742
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:11 pm
Location: Deutschland

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by Historiker »

Building a long ranged fast battleship would be more usefull than sub-carriers...
Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
Commander Stormwolf
Posts: 1623
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:11 pm

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by Commander Stormwolf »


1) historically japanese built several floatplane carriers

2) yamamoto wanted to build many more


it's not fantasy, it was in the war

could have interdicted the sloc between west coast and pearl, or pearl and australia

fighters (probably a single-seat seiran with a 20mm in the propeller) could damage the catalinas on patrol,
the strike planes could attack supply convoys

the best countermeasure would be to attach CVE to all those convoys, and that would slow down operations quite a bit

3) personally i would say the sen toku program was quite ambitious, if not superfluous, and the submarines themselves would have real difficulty
if forced to operate as real submarines (firing their torpedoes, evading destroyers)

probably the best design would be a modified AM submarine, but keeping the original config of the A1 (they reduced the HP of the AM to give it more range)

a lot faster to launch and recover 2 floatplanes, than 3 floatplanes (and the AM was half the price of a sen toku)
"No Enemy Survives Contact with the Plan" - Commander Stormwolf
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: castor troy
ORIGINAL: Commander Stormwolf


german submarines were basically unchanged since WW1, and they were pretty good at grinding it out against allied ships, and they built a large number of subs, so that was quite good for them

in an AE experimental mod I did once to test different designs, it was determined:

1) the best defence against ASW patrol planes is a float fighter on CAP above the submarine

2) the best defence against ASW ships, is a decoy midget sub to absorb 50% of the asw attacks


for next generation concepts, japanese submarines were a lot more advanced

a japanese wolfpack of carrier submarines can defend itself with float fighters, launch torpedo planes to attack convoys, use midget subs to distract enemy ASW or attack ports, and fire Typ95 torpedoes and Kaitens from long range

if yamamoto lived, they would have built 20 or so SenToku or just more AM class submarines,
would have been a real pain for allied convoys in 1944/1945


you can mod whatever you want but keep our eyes from this BS if you try to make it sound realistic

float fighters defending submarines and torpedo bombers attacking convoys, this is even sillier than your Emily fantasy or the other crap you want to sell as realism or what if history
Warspite1

Nice to see the recent pledge for forum moderation has been taken on board [8|]
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
LoBaron
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by LoBaron »

ORIGINAL: shoopzee

What do you think of a "Battle of the Atlantic" version of the game design? I know that the scale might have to be adjusted; but the more I play this game (and greatly enjoy it, I do) I find myself wondering what it would be like defending or attacking the Atlantic supply lines on this kind of scale.

Maybe a better name could be, "Wolfpack." any opinions? Just curious.

Don´t get me wrong, I am very interested in a Battle of the Atlantic scenario encompassing the whole "U boote attempt to choke an economy" war.

Just not with the WitP AE system. There are probably a whole lot of game engines better able to cope with the specific situations for such a scenario.

AE clearly favors equally or similary built navies, huge bodies of water with a low resolution (the 40nm hex), atoll and island hopping warfare, and the high ammount of
different options present for the players to chose.

I think in the Atlantic none of those features would work. Just imagine a similar situation in WitP AE and you understand why: It is impossible to simulate a submarine
blockade of a body of land as large as the UK - even when reducing the granularity to 10nm per hex - with the AE system without making it extremely boring. In AE
such a situation might be a minor part of a whole campaign. In the Atlantic you would do that stuff for the whole war. Exclusively.

I would fall asleep while plotting.

Image
User avatar
Shellshock
Posts: 573
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: U.S.

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by Shellshock »

Those in need of an immediate fix might have to seek out the old SPI magazine game of Wolfpack

Image
mdiehl
Posts: 3969
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by mdiehl »

I would not base a BoA design on the WitP game engine. Wrong time scale, wrong geographic scale, and too much fiddley subjective stuff involving subjectively determined, yet critical, numbers such as EXP and aggressiveness, that are based on no research at all.
Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by Dili »

Like LoBaron says Atlantic only just doesn't have enough wargame juice to extract from.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”