O.T. War in the Atlantic

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Commander Stormwolf
Posts: 1623
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:11 pm

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by Commander Stormwolf »



atlantic submarine war can be part of

a true war in the west scenario


the entire threater from battle of france onwards
"No Enemy Survives Contact with the Plan" - Commander Stormwolf
User avatar
Historiker
Posts: 4742
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:11 pm
Location: Deutschland

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by Historiker »

ORIGINAL: mdiehl

I would not base a BoA design on the WitP game engine. Wrong time scale, wrong geographic scale, and too much fiddley subjective stuff involving subjectively determined, yet critical, numbers such as EXP and aggressiveness, that are based on no research at all.
I see, the witp engine expert has spoken! [&o]
Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
jazman
Posts: 369
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:03 am
Location: Crush Depth

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by jazman »

Clay Blair's "Hitler's U-Boat War" shows how the u-boat war was a tonnage war where the Germans were losing ground right from the beginning. They never got close to winning. Sure they sank "X Tons" but even at the peak of losses the Allies' production was outstripping losses by a good margin. And when the Allied technical superiority kicked in (March-May, 1943) the turnaround was head-spinning.

I agree the Med would be intriguing--but this is a theatre where getting all the pieces right is essential. I was thinking the land war aspect of the WitP engine just isn't good enough.

The German air element is only interesting in Norway... Not enough German surface elements to sustain action. When to send out the Tirpitz for the Yamato-suicide run?

But I'd buy it.
BS, MS, PhD, WitP:AE, WitE, WitW
jazman
Posts: 369
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:03 am
Location: Crush Depth

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by jazman »

Grigsby is working on a War in the West variant of War in the East. The air war part of WitE is sadly sub-par. It'll be interesting to see what he comes up with, but I'm afraid the naval warfare part will be the sub-par element there.
BS, MS, PhD, WitP:AE, WitE, WitW
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: castor troy
ORIGINAL: Commander Stormwolf


german submarines were basically unchanged since WW1, and they were pretty good at grinding it out against allied ships, and they built a large number of subs, so that was quite good for them

in an AE experimental mod I did once to test different designs, it was determined:

1) the best defence against ASW patrol planes is a float fighter on CAP above the submarine

2) the best defence against ASW ships, is a decoy midget sub to absorb 50% of the asw attacks


for next generation concepts, japanese submarines were a lot more advanced

a japanese wolfpack of carrier submarines can defend itself with float fighters, launch torpedo planes to attack convoys, use midget subs to distract enemy ASW or attack ports, and fire Typ95 torpedoes and Kaitens from long range

if yamamoto lived, they would have built 20 or so SenToku or just more AM class submarines,
would have been a real pain for allied convoys in 1944/1945


you can mod whatever you want but keep our eyes from this BS if you try to make it sound realistic

float fighters defending submarines and torpedo bombers attacking convoys, this is even sillier than your Emily fantasy or the other crap you want to sell as realism or what if history
Warspite1

Nice to see the recent pledge for forum moderation has been taken on board [8|]


forum moderation or not, there is a point as to when BS just overflows the toilet and this has been an issue for the recent months when this silliness came out of somewhere and spams the forum like a spambot trying to sell porn or shoes.

User avatar
Grfin Zeppelin
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Germany

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by Grfin Zeppelin »

ORIGINAL: castor troy

or shoes.



Image
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: Gräfin Zeppelin

ORIGINAL: castor troy

or shoes.





www.zalando.de

mdiehl
Posts: 3969
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by mdiehl »

spams the forum like a spambot trying to sell porn or shoes.

Where's the harm?

Yes, he loves to imagine the IJN beefed up into some alternative universe juggernaut on the basis of fantasy tech. SO WHAT? If he were posting what if's about German 4E strategic jet bombers blitzing New York City he'd have a legion of devoted fans around here.

Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?
Commander Stormwolf
Posts: 1623
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:11 pm

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by Commander Stormwolf »



always saying the japanese are a bit overpowered in AE



restrictions need to be put on Jap AC production (separate aluminum and steel)

so AC cannot be built from HI points of cancelled ships



but i do have discussions about aircraft design (my specialty)

ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_Cheetah

and I am complimentary of the unorthodox weapons systems that were devised
"No Enemy Survives Contact with the Plan" - Commander Stormwolf
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by Terminus »

Makes me think of the old Carriers at War. The Complete edition, that is; had plenty of cool Atlantic and Arctic scenarios. Mmmm, those were the days...

The last time it was tried was NWS's Supremacy at Sea. Not a very good title...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
oldman45
Posts: 2325
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 4:15 am
Location: Jacksonville Fl

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by oldman45 »

I have never been really successful at sinking subs with an airplane so I am not sure how the bay of Biscay air interdiction would work out.

A game about the naval battle for the med would be great.

mdiehl
Posts: 3969
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

RE: O.T. War in the Atlantic

Post by mdiehl »

and I am complimentary of the unorthodox weapons systems that were devised

Some of them were interesting conceptually. Of course, I guess we could say that about most, errrm, "paradigm shifting" (a phrase I kinda dislike because it's a cliche) weapons.

I think their light mortar was interesting, and very useful, had it been produced in greater numbers. The Japanese army desperately needed support weapons. And their torps were very solid designs (albeit, resulting in the loss of several of their CAs from hits in the torpedo mounts, so perhaps a double-edged sword).

These days, I rather wish that the JNSDF would build a CV or two, but that is a discussion for some other place.
Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”