TF Retirement Low Ammo

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

TF Retirement Low Ammo

Post by Icedawg »

In some past games against the AI, I have had SCTFs withdraw from combat, apparently due to low ammo. My question is, is it just being out of ammo for the main gun s, or do torpedoes contribute as well?

For example, for CAs, if they are out of torpedoes, but have main gun ammo will they attempt to flee combat? The same question applies to DDs.
User avatar
Puhis
Posts: 1737
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:14 pm
Location: Finland

RE: TF Retirement Low Ammo

Post by Puhis »

SCTF tries to withdraw when they have low main gun ammo. They do fight without torpedoes as long as they have ammo left.
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

RE: TF Retirement Low Ammo

Post by Icedawg »

ORIGINAL: Puhis

SCTF tries to withdraw when they have low main gun ammo. They do fight without torpedoes as long as they have ammo left.

Thanks. This greatly influences how I will set up my rearming ports.
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: TF Retirement Low Ammo

Post by topeverest »

If you are going into a major fight, I would always reccomend rearming before. IME TF's can abort before they reach red ammo levels.
Andy M
Lcp Purcell
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 8:21 pm

RE: TF Retirement Low Ammo

Post by Lcp Purcell »

I kind of wish there was a way to tell your battleships not to fire all there main gun ammo at that small transport ship they meet on the way to the real fight.
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: TF Retirement Low Ammo

Post by topeverest »

All part of the scrum. You put your units in harm's way and the game engine calculates the carnage. If, on the other hand, you are playing against a foe who is specifically trying to make that happen so his BB's can swoop in against yours with low ammo, well that is tactics. IMHO, In some circumstances, sequential SCTF may be more successful than a single one, though in my experience there is only a narrow band of situations where you want to do that, and that generally is in a massive counterpulse sequence where you are all in for the combat.
Andy M
Itdepends
Posts: 937
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:59 am

RE: TF Retirement Low Ammo

Post by Itdepends »

Agree up to a point- but not if it's a lot of low value, empty transports ahead of the BB fleet.
Commander Stormwolf
Posts: 1623
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:11 pm

RE: TF Retirement Low Ammo

Post by Commander Stormwolf »



would be quite brilliant


send 100 AK ahead of a main engagement

enemy commander would be hard pressed to hold fire against such easy targets.. and then OOPS no ammo [:'(]
"No Enemy Survives Contact with the Plan" - Commander Stormwolf
User avatar
Empire101
Posts: 1950
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: Coruscant

RE: TF Retirement Low Ammo

Post by Empire101 »

'Quite Brilliant', is not something I would say on something bordering on the one hand, bad sportmanship, and the other cheating.

Rather too 'gamey' in my opinion. I would be extremely unhappy if my opponent started employing tactics such as this, and I for one would not employ such underhand and devious tactics.

Its rather like saying, 'Look, lets round up one hundred civilians, run them at the machine gun post until it runs out of ammo, and then attack!'.

If an opponent used such ungentlemanly and lets be truthful, 'unrealistic' conduct, I would quickly abort the game in disgust.
[font="Tahoma"]Our lives may be more boring than those who lived in apocalyptic times,
but being bored is greatly preferable to being prematurely dead because of some ideological fantasy.
[/font] - Michael Burleigh

User avatar
fodder
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Daytona Beach

RE: TF Retirement Low Ammo

Post by fodder »

ORIGINAL: Empire101

'Quite Brilliant', is not something I would say on something bordering on the one hand, bad sportmanship, and the other cheating.

If an opponent used such ungentlemanly and lets be truthful, 'unrealistic' conduct, I would quickly abort the game in disgust.

+1
Image
Commander Stormwolf
Posts: 1623
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:11 pm

RE: TF Retirement Low Ammo

Post by Commander Stormwolf »

'Look, lets round up one hundred civilians, run them at the machine gun post until it runs out of ammo, and then attack!'.

Wasn't that the soviet way? [;)]
"No Enemy Survives Contact with the Plan" - Commander Stormwolf
User avatar
Hanzberger
Posts: 925
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 12:16 pm
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Contact:

RE: TF Retirement Low Ammo

Post by Hanzberger »

ORIGINAL: Empire101

'Quite Brilliant', is not something I would say on something bordering on the one hand, bad sportmanship, and the other cheating.

Rather too 'gamey' in my opinion. I would be extremely unhappy if my opponent started employing tactics such as this, and I for one would not employ such underhand and devious tactics.

Its rather like saying, 'Look, lets round up one hundred civilians, run them at the machine gun post until it runs out of ammo, and then attack!'.

If an opponent used such ungentlemanly and lets be truthful, 'unrealistic' conduct, I would quickly abort the game in disgust.

OMG +1
Playing Scen 2 vs Ai currently

Japan AC wire chart here
tm.asp?m=2769286&mpage=1&key=?
peacemaker1945
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 9:20 am

RE: TF Retirement Low Ammo

Post by peacemaker1945 »

ORIGINAL: Commander Stormwolf
'Look, lets round up one hundred civilians, run them at the machine gun post until it runs out of ammo, and then attack!'.

Wasn't that the soviet way? [;)]



No, that is a typical stereotype of Hollywood, coming from fact that sometimes soviets threw badly equipped formations to stop German advance just for a few hours or days till reinforcements arrive. All this is pretty understandable thinking that within first 6 month of war Soviets lost almost whole army to Germans.
User avatar
Empire101
Posts: 1950
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: Coruscant

RE: TF Retirement Low Ammo

Post by Empire101 »

ORIGINAL: Commander Stormwolf
'Look, lets round up one hundred civilians, run them at the machine gun post until it runs out of ammo, and then attack!'.

Wasn't that the soviet way? [;)]


Come on CS you are being deliberately provocative!![:)]

You can be very naughty sometimes!!
[8|]
[font="Tahoma"]Our lives may be more boring than those who lived in apocalyptic times,
but being bored is greatly preferable to being prematurely dead because of some ideological fantasy.
[/font] - Michael Burleigh

Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”