PBEM Advice Requested (No Khyberbill Please)

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

PBEM Advice Requested (No Khyberbill Please)

Post by Icedawg »

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

I could use some advice here.

I'm planning my Luzon invasion and am torn between two landing sites - Lingayen or Batangas? Lingayen offers a quicker route to Clark, but Batangas allows a quicker route to Manila. As ny59giants pointed out to me in my thread in the AAR forum, with stacking limits in effect, Manila is the prime defensive location for the allies. If I can take that away, maybe Luzon will fall a bit quicker. Also, Batangas doesn't have any Long Toms in place like Lingayen does.

Any ideas?
User avatar
rwolan@sbcglobal.net
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:48 am

RE: PBEM Advice Requested (No Khyberbill Please)

Post by rwolan@sbcglobal.net »

Are you using the extended map?

Just curious as I have been able to in the past to isolate a few units and block them entering Bataan. Looking at the extended map, I can see how it now gives the Allied player another route of escape.

NicoDemon
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9891
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: PBEM Advice Requested (No Khyberbill Please)

Post by ny59giants »

Go for both Lingayen and Iba. Taking Iba will kill off a P-40 group and put you at the doorstep of Clark. From Lingayen, you can send a small unit back up the coast.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
dr.hal
Posts: 3570
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:41 pm
Location: Covington LA via Montreal!

RE: PBEM Advice Requested (No Khyberbill Please)

Post by dr.hal »

ORIGINAL: rwolan@sbcglobal.net

Are you using the extended map?

Just curious as I have been able to in the past to isolate a few units and block them entering Bataan. Looking at the extended map, I can see how it now gives the Allied player another route of escape.

That's why I like the extended map, a bit more realistic!
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

RE: PBEM Advice Requested (No Khyberbill Please)

Post by Icedawg »

ORIGINAL: rwolan@sbcglobal.net

Are you using the extended map?

Just curious as I have been able to in the past to isolate a few units and block them entering Bataan. Looking at the extended map, I can see how it now gives the Allied player another route of escape.


Yes I am.
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: PBEM Advice Requested (No Khyberbill Please)

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Icedawg
ORIGINAL: rwolan@sbcglobal.net

Are you using the extended map?

Just curious as I have been able to in the past to isolate a few units and block them entering Bataan. Looking at the extended map, I can see how it now gives the Allied player another route of escape.


Yes I am.

Can you post a screenshot with your prospective invasion hexes? I'm unfamiliar with the extended map.
Image
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

RE: PBEM Advice Requested (No Khyberbill Please)

Post by Icedawg »

Here you go Chickenboy.



Image
Attachments
ForumPost.jpg
ForumPost.jpg (316.69 KiB) Viewed 74 times
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: PBEM Advice Requested (No Khyberbill Please)

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Icedawg

Here you go Chickenboy.

Thanks, that's helpful.

Vigan-Lingayan-Clark is fine, IMO. You may consider paradropping into an unoccupied rail hex to cut off retreat towards Clark/Manila if you can.

I agree with the aforementioned preference for Iba in your southern pincer, if you're going to have a southern pincer per se. From Iba, walk it up to Batangas. This will better allow you to hold the narrow neck across the southern peninsula of Luzon.

I would be uneasy parking a vast amphibious assault TF just across the mouth of Manila harbor on turn 2. "Escorting" combat ships are notoriously porous in their defense. A few DMS or DDs from Manila (or the Hong Kong Britishers) could get in amidst your amphibious TF and cause some problems. Theoretically, Boise could be on site by turn 2 also, no? It would be a tempting target.

Perhaps if you wanted a southern pincer, ensure that Allied shipping has well and truly cleared off? Turn 2 at Iba/Batangas may be too far too fast-too stretched out.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”