Hairy Asian Experiences - GreyJoy (J) vs. Q-Ball (A)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by Icedawg »

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth

The Boise is sunk. You have now won

+1

I think I'd rather see her sunk more than any other ship the allies start the game with, including carriers and BBs. And I say that with a completely straight face - no exaggeration.

I more-than-half seriously think one of the developers must have been from Idaho or something and gave her some magical attributes hidden away in the code.
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by Canoerebel »

If this had been a straight surface combat battle - the Allies losing a CA and a couple of CLs and Japan losing CA Haguro - then I, as an Allied player, would feel pretty good about the outcome. CAs are gold. But there's something unsavory about engaging in a surface battle and then getting hammered by carrier strike aircraft. It just feels like you've gotten your fanny whipped.

Good job, GJ! I must say, you're holding your own against a very capable and very experienced opponent. Your pretty much on schedule and you've dished out some punishment. Q-Ball is doing good too, but you're really making him work for it.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by crsutton »

I hate to lose valuable Allied cruisers early in the game. But, it was a fair trade. And a trade is always a victory for the Allies.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
jeffk3510
Posts: 4143
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:59 am
Location: Merica

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by jeffk3510 »

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

If this had been a straight surface combat battle - the Allies losing a CA and a couple of CLs and Japan losing CA Haguro - then I, as an Allied player, would feel pretty good about the outcome. CAs are gold. But there's something unsavory about engaging in a surface battle and then getting hammered by carrier strike aircraft. It just feels like you've gotten your fanny whipped.

Good job, GJ! I must say, you're holding your own against a very capable and very experienced opponent. Your pretty much on schedule and you've dished out some punishment. Q-Ball is doing good too, but you're really making him work for it.

Couldn't pass it up!
Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by Canoerebel »

*ack*!
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
jeffk3510
Posts: 4143
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:59 am
Location: Merica

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by jeffk3510 »

I don't mind losing Allied CA/CLs early in game.. a pain? Yes, but you get so many later on. However, losing them as Japan HURTS.

In my AI GC game I just started, I hid Boise and Houston in the Sulu Sea, and then pounced on the Miri invasion fleet. Sank the entire fleet. I ACCIDENTLY hit refuel, AND saved the game, so, I had 2 hexes of movement since I used up all of the OPs points... BBs came in and trashed me, and I lost both ships. To me, that puts a HUGE dent in defending the DEI.. those are nasty ships for some reason.

CAs and CLs are very important ships IMO..sounds like a lot of other's opinions as well.
Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.
User avatar
jeffk3510
Posts: 4143
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:59 am
Location: Merica

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by jeffk3510 »

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

*ack*!

My sister corrects my English all of the time. She has an English degree. Same for my wife.

I just tell them my English is a lot gooder than theirs.
Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by BBfanboy »

Re: a beachhead in Java, I have never seen the IJA invade at Semarang [did I get that right?] about half way between Batavia and 'baja, but it seems like a good place to split the defenders and prevent a fighting withdrawal from one major port to the other. From that central location your fighters could cover most of Java.

Re: Rangoon, the usual strategy is to land at Akyab and march inland to cut the rail to Mandalay. After that happens no supply will flow down the Burma Road because there is no input from Rangoon. The cut-off defenders can be eliminated when you get enough troops from Malaya, DEI and/or SOPAC.
You will need to decide whether you are going onward after Burma or stopping to entrench and build forts in the favourable terrain.
Going after India against an experienced player will get you bogged down before you can consolidate and build up Burma.
Going after Australia risks your navy when the Allies get reinforcements. Lose control of the sea and any troops in Australia are cut off.
There are too many islands in the south seas to build an impregnable line of resistance - he can counter-build faster than you can and use LBA to attrit your islands. Again, your navy can only prevail in ther area until late 1942.

So, to me, the choices seems to be:
- establish a strong line of resistance early and conserve your forces to slow the Allied return [a Japanese "Good Sir Robin"]
- force major battles to devastate his navies in 1942 [very difficult against a skilled player]
- make a major "Phase II" move to make the game more interesting, knowing it will use up a lot of your assets and hasten the Allied advance

The question is "Do you feel lucky?" [;)]
Rotsa Ruck!
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
JohnDillworth
Posts: 3104
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by JohnDillworth »

The only Brooklyn/St. Louis class the US lost during the war, USS Helena, did return as a Baltimore-class CA, her keel being laid just two months after her loss.

Let's see, USS (SHIP WHO'S NAME WILL NOT BE SPOKEN)sunk Jan-42... (scribbles furiously)... she can indeed return as an Iowa-class in late 1944 (see construction of USS Wisconsin).

Wait, the USN in 1944 still assigned states as BB names.

Ah! Here we go! She can come back as an Essex class! As was amply demonstrated, we named those proud ships after any random name.

Instead of 16" rifles, I offer you 73 Hellcats, 15 Dauntlesses, and 15 Avengers.

I recommend you suggest that your opponent rename one of his incoming CVs in honor of his martyred CL.




SHIP WHO'S NAME WILL NOT BE SPOKEN is no ordinary Brooklyn Class CL. Many players think she has mystical powers far beyond her numerous rapid fire 6" guns. If I were the Allied player and I lost SHIP WHO'S NAME WILL NOT BE SPOKEN I would be distraught. As mentioned earlier, I think many of his useful surface assets are now gone. Excepting that CV air group, he only has a BB & a BC left on the table, and they will not come in Torp range me thinks
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by GreyJoy »

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

If this had been a straight surface combat battle - the Allies losing a CA and a couple of CLs and Japan losing CA Haguro - then I, as an Allied player, would feel pretty good about the outcome. CAs are gold. But there's something unsavory about engaging in a surface battle and then getting hammered by carrier strike aircraft. It just feels like you've gotten your fanny whipped.

Good job, GJ! I must say, you're holding your own against a very capable and very experienced opponent. Your pretty much on schedule and you've dished out some punishment. Q-Ball is doing good too, but you're really making him work for it.


Dan, as always, thanks for your support and your kind words

Brad is making me bleed. Exactly what a good allied player should do. He cannot stop me...but he can hurt the empire in the process and slow him down to the point where he has to stop.

Now i have half of my CA/CLs out of action (2 CAs sunk, 2 CLs sunk plus a lot damaged) and i'm short of 15 DDs by now...i need to contain my losses during the next advances...if not i risk to arrive without a navy in 1943!
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by GreyJoy »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Re: a beachhead in Java, I have never seen the IJA invade at Semarang [did I get that right?] about half way between Batavia and 'baja, but it seems like a good place to split the defenders and prevent a fighting withdrawal from one major port to the other. From that central location your fighters could cover most of Java.

Re: Rangoon, the usual strategy is to land at Akyab and march inland to cut the rail to Mandalay. After that happens no supply will flow down the Burma Road because there is no input from Rangoon. The cut-off defenders can be eliminated when you get enough troops from Malaya, DEI and/or SOPAC.
You will need to decide whether you are going onward after Burma or stopping to entrench and build forts in the favourable terrain.
Going after India against an experienced player will get you bogged down before you can consolidate and build up Burma.
Going after Australia risks your navy when the Allies get reinforcements. Lose control of the sea and any troops in Australia are cut off.
There are too many islands in the south seas to build an impregnable line of resistance - he can counter-build faster than you can and use LBA to attrit your islands. Again, your navy can only prevail in ther area until late 1942.

So, to me, the choices seems to be:
- establish a strong line of resistance early and conserve your forces to slow the Allied return [a Japanese "Good Sir Robin"]
- force major battles to devastate his navies in 1942 [very difficult against a skilled player]
- make a major "Phase II" move to make the game more interesting, knowing it will use up a lot of your assets and hasten the Allied advance

The question is "Do you feel lucky?" [;)]
Rotsa Ruck!


Mate, Sabarang was exactly the place i was looking upon! He has massed 16 units in Batavia. Now i will recon Sosarbaja and see what he has there...however i think that, with his best cruisers out of action and the presence of a strong Mini-KB for cover, an early landing is possible. Think i should be able to land there with the equivalent of a division by the end of Jan 42. Estabilish a strong bridghead (with some 100 Zeros) and then wait for 2 more divisions coming from malaya once singa has fallen.

What to do next? Well, i don't feel that lucky anymore... Brad showed me how strong and capable player he is and i'd like to remain a challenge for him even in 1944...so i need to be conservative...smart and sneaky but conservative.
I see two main options in my grand strategy:
A push towards Northern Oz (conquering everything from Portland Roads to Darwin-Alice spring (excluded) and Exmouth) and fortify in Burma (historical perimeter) or to draw a line at Timor-Ambon and try an early landing with 3 divisions into the indian plains around Dacca...conquer those plains and so give some more time for my "oil-guys" to pump as much oil as possible from burma....

Still haven't decided what to do...

Both Burma and Southern DEI are two easy route of advance for the allies in 1943...so i'm puzzled
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by Canoerebel »

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
Mate, Sabarang was exactly the place i was looking upon!





Sabarang is a cabaret midway between Semereng and Sabang, which puts it somewhere in the Sunda Straits....
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by GreyJoy »

Jan 11 1942
 
After the battles of yesterday i sent 4 DDs to intercept the only survivor CL he had left...the Hobart... my guys tangled with the big ships and score 26 hits...but not a single torp... then a CLTF engaged...and again...lots of hits (few of my DDs lighly damaged) but the damned ship didn't go down... as a counterresponse, my 4DDs ended up into a minefield at Balikapan and 2 of them got sunk (modern ones)[:o]
 
Kaga's group ended in the same hex of Hobart...and not a single plane took off!!!!! com'on!!!
 
Well...i hope she will sink anyway...being so badly damaged....
 
What else? KB is moving south towards Noumea...our glens spotted a huge TFs composed of several APs unloading at Sydney...maybe i cannot get them but if i'd manage to...well, it will be an easy and juicy prey!
 
Unloading a BF at PM...soon we'll start to recon Horn island, portland roads and Mereuake.
 
Invading Buna right now too.
 
2 regiments, a tank regiment, an arty regiment and some minor engineers units are ready to be loaded at Mindanao... these guys will attack Ambon, along with 3 SNLF units and then proceed for Timor
User avatar
Lecivius
Posts: 4845
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:53 am
Location: Denver

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by Lecivius »

You seem to be having a lot of luck!
 
 
Not all of it good, either [:(]
If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
Mate, Sabarang was exactly the place i was looking upon!





Sabarang is a cabaret midway between Semereng and Sabang, which puts it somewhere in the Sunda Straits....
At first glance I read the highlighted word as "cabernet" which, given the imbibing smiley, would also be appropriate! [:)]
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
JohnDillworth
Posts: 3104
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by JohnDillworth »

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

If this had been a straight surface combat battle - the Allies losing a CA and a couple of CLs and Japan losing CA Haguro - then I, as an Allied player, would feel pretty good about the outcome. CAs are gold. But there's something unsavory about engaging in a surface battle and then getting hammered by carrier strike aircraft. It just feels like you've gotten your fanny whipped.

Good job, GJ! I must say, you're holding your own against a very capable and very experienced opponent. Your pretty much on schedule and you've dished out some punishment. Q-Ball is doing good too, but you're really making him work for it.


Couldn't pass it up!


Yikes!! well met and well deserved. I will inhale my beverage presently
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
princep01
Posts: 945
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:02 pm
Location: Texas

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by princep01 »

Ser Greyjoy, given the relative ease with which the Allies can build a supply base in northern OZ and pounce on Timor under LBA cover, I'd say northern OZ is a virtual "must".  You will eventually lose it, but delaying the return of the Q-Ball led Allies to those northern ports (particularly Darwin) can discourage the "too easy" advance into the SRA.  I'd suggest you don't let that happen.
 
Wirh judicious use of your forces, you should be able to remain on the offensive through 42.  But, my primary goal would be to engage his CVs and win that fight in 42. That will delay his taking the strategic offensive even longer.  Achieving that would be my preferred approach.  Tactically, a bait and trap approach might work even against a crafty player like Q-Ball.  Yamamoto had the right strategic idea at Midway, he just deployed very badly and had the wrong Admiral in charge of KB whom, in turn, executed the fight about as badly as possible.  But, drawing the Allied CVs into an uneven fight with KB was an excellent idea.
 
Of course, once you have decided upon and established your defensive perimeter, you must not neglect the many tactical decisions among which is:  What bases will I really build up?  The map above relating to the Solomons indicates you are giving that serious thought....bravo.
User avatar
jeffk3510
Posts: 4143
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:59 am
Location: Merica

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by jeffk3510 »

Sir GJ-

Do you mind explaining what a corpes is..

Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.
User avatar
JohnDillworth
Posts: 3104
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by JohnDillworth »

Now i will recon Sosarbaja
=Surabaya?
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
User avatar
Cribtop
Posts: 3890
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 1:42 pm
Location: Lone Star Nation

RE: Waves of corpes

Post by Cribtop »

Man, this drinking game is tough! I'm rasted. [:D]
Image
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”