Mines in the Pacific--Historical View

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7403
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Mines in the Pacific--Historical View

Post by Q-Ball »

In a general sense, it seems like the different combattants came into the Pacific War with varying ideas on the use of mines.

From reading KAIGUN, I know the IJN was definitely interested in mine warfare, an outgrowth of the role that mines played in the Russo Japanese War (where the greatest loss the IJN suffered was to Russian mines, when 2 pre-dreadnaughts were lost to a minefield). As a result of this experience, the IJN placed a fairly high emphasis on mine warfare, with the result that several minelayers were built, up to the large minelayer/cruiser OKINOSHIMA. Given the actual role that mines played in the Pacific, this has to be considered a waste of valuable resources in retrospect.

I don't really know, but from the OOB it looks like the USN didn't really place that much emphasis on it. There were few dedicated USN Minelayers, and they were really for harbor defense. Offensive minelaying didn't seem to figure into USN doctrine much.

The Dutch Navy, for whatever reason, seems mine obsessed from the OOB. The Dutch start with several dedicated minelayers, and piles of minesweepers, including so many coastal minesweepers you want to just sink some to get rid of them. They built minelaying subs, and seems like mines were a big part of Dutch doctrine. No idea, maybe it was thought of as an equalizer, or defensive weapon.

Anyway, I wonder if anyone better read on the subject can shed a little more light on pre-war mine doctrine, and any tidbits on the limited roles that mines played. I know a handful of ships were lost to mines in the Solomons, but in the end mines played a very minor role in the Pacific. That's my understanding, anyway.
Commander Stormwolf
Posts: 1623
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:11 pm

RE: Mines in the Pacific--Historical View

Post by Commander Stormwolf »


a pbem game: 3 japanese CA hit a minefield at kragen while they were retiring to oosthaven...
had to send them to palembang for repairs, where they struggele to pump the water out [X(]
"No Enemy Survives Contact with the Plan" - Commander Stormwolf
User avatar
jeffk3510
Posts: 4143
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:59 am
Location: Merica

RE: Mines in the Pacific--Historical View

Post by jeffk3510 »

I don't know about dedicated ships, Brad..however, the air dropped mine campaign was massive and extremely effective if I understand my history correct. The mines the US dropped in the sea lanes around the Home Island just devestated the Japanese merchant fleet..
Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.
1275psi
Posts: 7987
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 10:47 pm

RE: Mines in the Pacific--Historical View

Post by 1275psi »

read a little on the mine effort against japan (worked in a mine warfare school , so some things seep in[:D])

read that Japan was so desperate that they built special mine sweeping barges.............there you go, man that, sail out......BOOM!. Well, that way is clear now............[8|]
big seas, fast ships, life tastes better with salt
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5244
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Mines in the Pacific--Historical View

Post by zuluhour »

I made a visit to the US Navy's WWII mine warefare base near Solomon Island (Maryland). My impression is the US dedicated more to R&D than actual production, constantly testing and improving.


Image
Attachments
mine2.jpg
mine2.jpg (151.86 KiB) Viewed 85 times
User avatar
Titanwarrior89
Posts: 3282
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 4:07 pm
Location: arkansas
Contact:

RE: Mines in the Pacific--Historical View

Post by Titanwarrior89 »

Interesting photo.
"Before Guadalcanal the enemy advanced at his pleasure. After Guadalcanal, he retreated at ours".

"Mama, There's Rabbits in the Garden"
User avatar
jeffk3510
Posts: 4143
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:59 am
Location: Merica

RE: Mines in the Pacific--Historical View

Post by jeffk3510 »

We can almost see you in that photo [X(]
Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.
User avatar
Grunt
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 1:26 am
Location: Idaho, USA

RE: Mines in the Pacific--Historical View

Post by Grunt »

R2D2 MkI?
Itdepends
Posts: 937
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:59 am

RE: Mines in the Pacific--Historical View

Post by Itdepends »

For the dutch in the east indies mine as a defensive weapon makes more sense with the shallow water (easier to lay/less losses) and many choke points.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”