Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

OOB:

FYI I have only used AP's on FZ creation and FZ disbandment.

Once the Corps HQ start to disband it's time to iron out C&C with the Armies and from that leader and SU assignments.

FACS evac'd from Kiev, Odessa and T50's from LG.

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (271.99 KiB) Viewed 5842 times
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2252
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Seminole »

You might find yourself a little too forward in the south (around Zhitomir). Those panzers can still knife through at this stage. Also not taking advantage of the available covered terrain in favor of an absolute checkerboard I'm leery of as well. I'd rather my troops fight twice as effectively, myself.
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2252
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Seminole »

I will not play Random Weather again.

I can just see General Franks calling Rumsfeld now, "Rummy, three days of sandstorms! It's total BS! We can't see much on the ground, we can't fly our helos. It's frigging up my entire timetable for taking Basra and storming Baghdad! I'm never going to war without 100% predictable weather again!"
No wonder he retired...
[:D]
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

Hi Seminole,

Re: South. It's a fair point regarding terrain use. My current view in this game is I don't mind. I'm up to 10th July. These guys down south are purely buying time for the Dnepr Line. You're right though there's always the option of a looser Checkerboard in favour of terrain.
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
hfarrish
Posts: 731
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:52 pm

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by hfarrish »


Depends on the opponent, but I thought it was pretty widely agreed at this point the checkerboard was ineffective against the stronger German players; I know I stopped using it after being burned by the "herding" effect...
Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

Sure but each situation has a different set of options. With the forces I had at my disposal in SW front I had 4 options:

1.) Form lines = no good as not enough units.
2.) carpet with reserves = not enough units.
3.) run = an option but don't want to do this as it exposes Southern Front which is stuck in mud.
4.) checkerboard = best option as I saw it as requires more work to pocket and even if so fewer units would be lost than either opening up Southern Front or running away leaving the Dnepr exposed sooner.

By the way I feel all defensive options are available against all players it just depends upon the situation at hand and what is best.
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2252
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Seminole »

Depends on the opponent, but I thought it was pretty widely agreed at this point the checkerboard was ineffective against the stronger German players; I know I stopped using it after being burned by the "herding" effect...


I think the German units getting cut off at this point are an indicator his opponent hasn't played a human much yet. But I would anticipate his delays are going to impel him to increase his risks to make up for lost time.
Seeing that SS Mot Div in the southern edge of the Pripyat and the armor near Tarnopol is what led me to warn on the danger. Panzers busting through straight to the east can hook north and meet up with the SS with relatively little combat (hasty is much more likely to succeed in the open terrain as well, and Zhitomir is curiously empty). There's even a chance that another panzer could follow and hook south, capturing the majority of SW Front. In my current campaign I more than once made the mistake of counting up movement costs of blasting through combat/ZOC without the consideration that a follow-on unit wouldn't have all those extra costs. Strategically, I was about a week behind the Pzr Groups capabilities in my estimation of their range. It led to horrendous fall losses.
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

Hi Seminole,

Indeed this is an option. Let's see how it plays out. Also I'm still in the phase of working out/judging Mogmark's play style an level etc. This will be a good test for this.
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

Start of SU T4 post Recon.

LG:

1 x PzC is threatening to sneak in north of Peipus and with some incursion SE of Pskov it's time to fall back a bit and man the Lovat/Pola south of Lake Ilmen as well.

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (587.13 KiB) Viewed 5842 times
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

Smolensk:

A PzC is heading towards Velikiye Luki. Time to rail in a few units here to slow him down.

The Landbridge has been partially forced so time for a re-org here as well.

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (578.68 KiB) Viewed 5842 times
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

AGC South:

Das Reich failed in 2 attempts to cross the Dnepr.

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (566.65 KiB) Viewed 5842 times
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

Zhitomir:

9th, 16th Panzer and SS Wiking storm east of Rovno encircling 2 x Division.

Due to unit density I'll probably retreat here now and as such will also retreat Southern Front further south........

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (569.29 KiB) Viewed 5842 times
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

South:

I almost forgot to say the Lvov Pocket was totally liquidated this week.

German's forced the Dnestr in 2 places so I'll pull back here too whilst leaving a Garrison in Odessa.


Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (497.82 KiB) Viewed 5842 times
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

LG area post SU moves:

I'm railing up a batch of reinforcements from other areas as there's no shortage of units in the Center or South. This batch will anchor around the Volkhov.

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (566.29 KiB) Viewed 5842 times
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

The situation south of Lake Ilmen:

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (595.41 KiB) Viewed 5842 times
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

VL Area:

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (574.45 KiB) Viewed 5842 times
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

Smolensk:

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (582.47 KiB) Viewed 5842 times
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

Gomel:

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (528.58 KiB) Viewed 5842 times
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

Kiev:

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (552.69 KiB) Viewed 5842 times
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Speedysteve
Posts: 15981
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Speedy vs Mogmark (no Mogmark)

Post by Speedysteve »

South:

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (475.27 KiB) Viewed 5842 times
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”