Val - Judy: To upgrade or not to upgrade

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: Val - Judy: To upgrade or not to upgrade

Post by Shark7 »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

Judy.  SR only matters after a few days of op's.  MOST CV battles are decided on the first day.  Longer range and bigger bomb matter, SR is minor point.

PS: as pointed out above, the Val was obsolete in '41. Think Stuka ... too old, too slow, too short legged, and too little bomb.

Only the Stuka carried a 500kg (1100 lbs) bomb, making it slightly more useful if it actually made it to the target.

No doubt the Val was a good airplane when it first went into service, but was a deathtrap by mid '43.
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
FatR
Posts: 2522
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:04 am
Location: St.Petersburg, Russia

RE: Val - Judy: To upgrade or not to upgrade

Post by FatR »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

Judy.  SR only matters after a few days of op's.  MOST CV battles are decided on the first day.  Longer range and bigger bomb matter, SR is minor point.

PS: as pointed out above, the Val was obsolete in '41. Think Stuka ... too old, too slow, too short legged, and too little bomb.
Speed and particularly range of D3A were good for 1941-42 (the game undersells it somewhat, IMO, or, rather, gives its SBD excessive normal range with its maximum payload). Its only major flaw was relatively light bombload (370kg max, 250 normal). Like many Japanese planes it suffered in 1943 and later from insufficient improvements to its engine and delays with mass production of its intended replacement (D4Y was supposed to enter production somewhere in late 1942, but only appeared in significant numbers during the Battle of Philippine Sea, AFAIK).
The Reluctant Admiral mod team.

Take a look at the latest released version of the Reluctant Admiral mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20550
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Val - Judy: To upgrade or not to upgrade

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

Judy.  SR only matters after a few days of op's.  MOST CV battles are decided on the first day.  Longer range and bigger bomb matter, SR is minor point.

PS: as pointed out above, the Val was obsolete in '41. Think Stuka ... too old, too slow, too short legged, and too little bomb.
+1 on the Val's vulneability. My CAP and AA [Marianas Scenario] shot them down in droves.
Judys - maybe a third as many for the same numbers attacking.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
SuluSea
Posts: 2414
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:13 pm

RE: Val - Judy: To upgrade or not to upgrade

Post by SuluSea »

After thinking about it I think I'll make a change to my R&D and put the two factories earmarked for D3A2/D5Y1 upgrade into the DY4 program and get the D4Y4 a little bit earlier.


To quote Dombo--
Imagine DB's with 800KG bombs on your carriers*! Oh it's good to be a JFB :)



*slight drawback: your CV's most likely are sunk by this date.......


Yes it is!! HEHEHE[:)][;)]
"There’s no such thing as a bitter person who keeps the bitterness to himself.” ~ Erwin Lutzer
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10820
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Val - Judy: To upgrade or not to upgrade

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Shark7

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

Judy.  SR only matters after a few days of op's.  MOST CV battles are decided on the first day.  Longer range and bigger bomb matter, SR is minor point.

PS: as pointed out above, the Val was obsolete in '41. Think Stuka ... too old, too slow, too short legged, and too little bomb.

Only the Stuka carried a 500kg (1100 lbs) bomb, making it slightly more useful if it actually made it to the target.
I forgot that (about the Stuka). Had to go back to the flight manual. Balance had to be terrible with it though ...



Image
Attachments
Ju87B2manual.jpg
Ju87B2manual.jpg (95.78 KiB) Viewed 187 times
Pax
User avatar
Atilla60
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:07 am
Location: Jutland, Denmark

RE: Val - Judy: To upgrade or not to upgrade

Post by Atilla60 »

ORIGINAL: SuluSea

To quote Dombo--
Imagine DB's with 800KG bombs on your carriers*! Oh it's good to be a JFB :)



*slight drawback: your CV's most likely are sunk by this date.......


Yes it is!! HEHEHE[:)][;)]

Technicality [:)]
It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.
-Sir Winston Churchill-
User avatar
Historiker
Posts: 4742
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:11 pm
Location: Deutschland

RE: Val - Judy: To upgrade or not to upgrade

Post by Historiker »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

ORIGINAL: Shark7

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

Judy.  SR only matters after a few days of op's.  MOST CV battles are decided on the first day.  Longer range and bigger bomb matter, SR is minor point.

PS: as pointed out above, the Val was obsolete in '41. Think Stuka ... too old, too slow, too short legged, and too little bomb.

Only the Stuka carried a 500kg (1100 lbs) bomb, making it slightly more useful if it actually made it to the target.
I forgot that (about the Stuka). Had to go back to the flight manual. Balance had to be terrible with it though ...



Image
Just that your manual tells that one possible bombload was 1x1000kg bomb, even though it says "bombloads with 1000kg or 500kg have to be avoided if possible".
Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10820
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Val - Judy: To upgrade or not to upgrade

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Historiker


Just that your manual tells that one possible bombload was 1x1000kg bomb, even though it says "bombloads with 1000kg or 500kg have to be avoided if possible".
I understood that, hence my comment that the balance had to be terrible. And no doubt shortened the range considerably. Still, the fact that they could get airborne with those loads ... pretty impressive.
Pax
User avatar
Historiker
Posts: 4742
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:11 pm
Location: Deutschland

RE: Val - Judy: To upgrade or not to upgrade

Post by Historiker »

one 1.800kg bomb was also possible. [8D]
Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: Val - Judy: To upgrade or not to upgrade

Post by Shark7 »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

ORIGINAL: Shark7

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

Judy.  SR only matters after a few days of op's.  MOST CV battles are decided on the first day.  Longer range and bigger bomb matter, SR is minor point.

PS: as pointed out above, the Val was obsolete in '41. Think Stuka ... too old, too slow, too short legged, and too little bomb.

Only the Stuka carried a 500kg (1100 lbs) bomb, making it slightly more useful if it actually made it to the target.
I forgot that (about the Stuka). Had to go back to the flight manual. Balance had to be terrible with it though ...



Image

Being that the Stuka had all the characteristics of a flying brick to start with, would you really notice it that much? [:D]
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”