2 v 2 [In Prgress... again]

ironduke1955 · Post by **ironduke1955** » Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:39 pm

Ok have changed order to MeanLazyHateIron

Meanfcker · Post by **Meanfcker** » Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:53 am

I have restarted the game with the settings listed in my first post.

I am the brownish one in the middle.
Lazy is in the upper right.
Your team's Supremo(he always goes first) is the greenish one.
Your team's Sub Commander is the pinkish one.
Map loop is on.
I will complete my turn today sometime and put it in the dropbox for Lazy.
Decide who your Supreme Commander will be and leave word so that Lazyboy knows who to name it for.

Meanfcker · Post by **Meanfcker** » Sat Sep 29, 2012 1:17 pm

Hey guys,
On closer examination, I concluded that the map was very unfair to whoever would be stuck as your Supremo.
I will regenerate until I come up with something better. I really wish for the map to be as even as possible so our decision may be reached by skill and not by initial positioning on the map.
I will start one asap and put a screenshot in folder. If any one has an objection to what I put in let me know.
Meanfcker.

Meanfcker · Post by **Meanfcker** » Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:00 pm

I have made a new map and will complete my turn today sometime and send off to Lazy.
I would like to start a new standard procedure for team games.
As one side starts to win and the game becomes less fun for the other, the game tends to slow down.
If you are going on vacation let us know ahead of time and this wont count for the following.
If a player does not take his turn within 7 days of it being available to him, his partner has 3 days to complete the turn or it is considered a surrender.
Does this sound fair to everyone?
This obviously means that we should make our passwords known to our team mates.
Let me know what you think
Meanfcker.

ironduke1955 · Post by **ironduke1955** » Sat Sep 29, 2012 9:10 pm

Sounds fine to me just completed a series of 1V1 games completed 3 to 4 turns a day. If you sign up for these games it is not unreasonable for you to have forfeited the game if you refuse to complete a turn within a reasonable time frame. But I feel some people beleive if they simply refuse to complete their turn somehow it means they were never defeated !!! mind boggling. If you refuse to complete a turn you were not only whooped but you have shown that you are to childish to admit that you were whooped a double whammy. Sounds like a rant but I have been a victim of the absentee ATG recently.

LazyBoy · Post by **LazyBoy** » Sun Sep 30, 2012 3:41 am

Sounds fair to me

Meanfcker · Post by **Meanfcker** » Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:37 am

Lazy's turn is in the box as well as map for everyone.
Meanfcker.

ironduke1955 · Post by **ironduke1955** » Sun Sep 30, 2012 12:17 pm

Fairly sure that this map will not work as you must be aware Hatem is new to the game and will struggle with this map as will I

.

Meanfcker · Post by **Meanfcker** » Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:41 pm

The idea here is to engage in operational warfare. If it is a complete washout when we rematch, we can mix up the teams so that everyone gets to see how it works. This is Lazyboy's first time as a Sub Commander and he will need to see how it works from the inside. This way he can take Supremo for his turn in the second game.
Meanfcker.

ironduke1955 · Post by **ironduke1955** » Sun Sep 30, 2012 3:07 pm

I must apologize I will have to drop out of this game I have way to much on my plate at the moment. I would not be able to give this game the attention it deserves. And I beleive as Mean says you should not enter into these games unless you can give them 100%

Meanfcker · Post by **Meanfcker** » Sun Sep 30, 2012 3:30 pm

Well that is too bad.
We will regen and start all over as soon as we have a fourth.
This will be Strategic and Operational level warfarel
It will be and xx large map with no PBEM protection so that the very long turns may be done in more than one sitting.
Any takers?

kombrig · Post by **kombrig** » Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:00 am

You can count me in.

LazyBoy · Post by **LazyBoy** » Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:03 am

Will we start a new map? I prefer we carry on with this one as I have just about completed my first turn.

Meanfcker · Post by **Meanfcker** » Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:06 am

Cool, welcome Kombrig. We had already started a our first turns, and unfortunately one of our opponents dropped out.
Kombrig, could you please email me? pas.x@hotmail.com Once I have your email I can invite you to the game dropbox.
You should email your teammate, Hatemf90 so that you guys can properly coordinate your actions.
Lazyboy, I know it is a lot of work but it is really proper that I regerate and that we are starting fresh.
I have to go out today but I will regen and post new map in dropbox and then try to complete my turn tonight.
Meanfcker.

kombrig · Post by **kombrig** » Mon Oct 01, 2012 2:58 pm

E-mails sent to Meanfcker and Hatemf90

Meanfcker · Post by **Meanfcker** » Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:55 pm

I have completed first turn and put in Dropbox.
Good luck and have fun.
Meanfcker

LazyBoy · Post by **LazyBoy** » Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am

Completed turn 1

Turn 1 for Royal Perm in drop box.

Good luck, hope we all have a good game

kombrig · Post by **kombrig** » Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:56 am

Hasn't gotten response from Hatemf90 yet. Which one of us should go first?

Meanfcker · Post by **Meanfcker** » Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:01 pm

I suggest that you wait until you communicate with your ally. Whichever of you is the most experienced map reader and strategist should assume Supreme Command and should go first. Your Supreme Commander should be bold and creative when developing Strategic and Operational concepts.
Our team wont waste even one unit of Oil on movements that are not directly involved in securing Operational Objectives.

Meanfcker.

kombrig · Post by **kombrig** » Sat Oct 06, 2012 7:12 pm

Hatem, are you still in? Haven't recieved any message from you.

2 v 2 [In Prgress... again]

RE: 2 v 2 [Closed]

RE: 2 v 2 [Closed]

RE: 2 v 2 [Closed]

RE: 2 v 2 [Closed]

RE: 2 v 2 [Closed]

RE: 2 v 2 [Closed]

RE: 2 v 2 [Closed]

RE: 2 v 2 [Closed]

RE: 2 v 2 [Closed]

RE: 2 v 2 [Closed]

RE: 2 v 2 [Recruiting]

RE: 2 v 2 [Recruiting]

RE: 2 v 2 [Recruiting]

RE: 2 v 2 [Recruiting]

RE: 2 v 2 [Recruiting]

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]

RE: 2 v 2 [In progress]