How are mines handled

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
loader6
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue May 21, 2002 3:17 pm
Location: Kentucky

How are mines handled

Post by loader6 »

This may have been asked before, but how are mines going to be handled in WITP? Currently, mines are the thing I like the least in UV. In fact I pretty much can't stand them. No they haven't been a show stopper in any game, I learned early to protect my MSWs. It's just I get tired of seeing the entire Solomons as one big mine field.
Snigbert
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Worcester, MA. USA

Post by Snigbert »

How are mines handled

Very very carefully.
"Money doesnt talk, it swears. Obscenities, who really cares?" -Bob Dylan

"Habit is the balast that chains a dog to it's vomit." -Samuel Becket

"He has weapons of mass destruction- the world's deadliest weapons- which pose a direct threat to the
User avatar
U2
Posts: 2009
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Västerås,Sweden
Contact:

Post by U2 »

Originally posted by Snigbert
How are mines handled

Very very carefully.


Hey you broke the NDA!:D :D :D
Snigbert
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Worcester, MA. USA

Post by Snigbert »

Hey you broke the NDA!


No, that would only be if I told them how the Japanese player can develope an atomic bomb.

Ooops! ****, said too much again.
"Money doesnt talk, it swears. Obscenities, who really cares?" -Bob Dylan

"Habit is the balast that chains a dog to it's vomit." -Samuel Becket

"He has weapons of mass destruction- the world's deadliest weapons- which pose a direct threat to the
loader6
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue May 21, 2002 3:17 pm
Location: Kentucky

Post by loader6 »

I'll remember to wear extra thick gloves next time I handle one. I was just wondering if anyone knew and was able to post if there were set numbers or only certain bases, or they worked like supply and had to be transported around, etc, but I'm guessing no one can answer this due to NDAs. No big deal, I'm getting the game now matter what.
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

Reloads

Post by mogami »

Hi, Current plans are for submarines to reload, they need to be at a size 9/10 port. Or a sub tender needs to be located at port (smaller then size 9/10)
For surface ships to reload torpedos they need to be at a size 9/10 port or a destroyer tender needs to be located at port
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
loader6
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue May 21, 2002 3:17 pm
Location: Kentucky

Post by loader6 »

Thanks for the reply Mogami. I definately like those ideas.
User avatar
showboat1
Posts: 452
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Atoka, TN

Post by showboat1 »

I think that's a little extreme on the port size, but hey, as long as DD tenders are being included I guess its okay. The more ships the merrier, I say!
SF3C B. B. New USS North Carolina BB-55 - Permission is granted to go ashore for the last shore leave. (1926-2003)
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

Post by Nikademus »

any plans to represent the USN torpedo shortage at war's start?
Yamamoto
Posts: 742
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Miami, Fl. U.S.A.

Re: Reloads

Post by Yamamoto »

Originally posted by Mogami
Hi, Current plans are for submarines to reload, they need to be at a size 9/10 port. Or a sub tender needs to be located at port (smaller then size 9/10)
For surface ships to reload torpedos they need to be at a size 9/10 port or a destroyer tender needs to be located at port


Yuck! If I have to sail my subs all the way back to a size 9 or 10 port, which I doubt the Japanese will have many of, they will suffer so much system damage that they will be useless very quickly.

I hope “Destroyer” tenders can also re-load torpedoes on heavy cruisers as well. Personally, I don’t think torpedoes should be treated any differently than any other type of ordinance. What’s next, keeping track of how many rounds of 25mm ammo we have on board? I certainly home we won’t have to keep track of how many torpedoes we have on a carrier. Please tell me carriers won’t need “destroyer” tenders to reload their aircraft’s torpedoes.

Yamamoto
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

Post by Nikademus »

From Snigbert's test a couple threads down, it appears that the incidental SYS factor has been toned down alot so based on that i dont think you have too worry about that too much.

Forcing subs to move to certain sized ports and/or a port with a sub tender is a very historical move. The loss of Manila (and its stock of torps) was a signifigant blow to the silent service and forced it to relocate and re-establish a sub base in Australia complete with a new sub-tender and operational HQ

Otherwise, we get what i experienced in one PBEM....having an invasion fleet face subs with unlimited ammo because they replenish after each turn (because the base is a friendly one to the sub TF)

I'm still awaiting test results though in regards to non-cruise type missions (bombardment----fast transport)

:)
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

Re: Re: Reloads

Post by mogami »

Originally posted by Yamamoto
Yuck! If I have to sail my subs all the way back to a size 9 or 10 port, which I doubt the Japanese will have many of, they will suffer so much system damage that they will be useless very quickly.

I hope “Destroyer” tenders can also re-load torpedoes on heavy cruisers as well. Personally, I don’t think torpedoes should be treated any differently than any other type of ordinance. What’s next, keeping track of how many rounds of 25mm ammo we have on board? I certainly home we won’t have to keep track of how many torpedoes we have on a carrier. Please tell me carriers won’t need “destroyer” tenders to reload their aircraft’s torpedoes.

Yamamoto


Hi, Destroyer tender also reload other ships except PT boats. PT's have their own type support ships

Ships that reload weapons:
PT boat tender
destroyer tender
mine tender
sub tender
In a replenshment TF ammo ships can reload ammo but not torpedos.

everything can restock in a size 9 port
smaller ports need the tenders.

There are also repair ships, all tenders help repair their type ship faster. Repair ships repair all ships faster

Carrier ammo for aircraft loadouts remains the same.
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”