Armoured Train observation.

Commander - The Great War is the latest release in the popular and playable Commander series of historical strategy games. Gamers will enjoy a huge hex based campaign map that stretches from the USA in the west, Africa and Arabia to the south, Scandinavia to the north and the Urals to the east on a new engine that is more efficient and fully supports widescreen resolutions.
Commander – The Great War features a Grand Campaign covering the whole of World War I from the invasion of Belgium on August 5, 1914 to the Armistice on the 11th of November 1918 in addition to 16 different unit types including Infantry, Cavalry, Armoured Cars and Tanks, Artillery, Railroad Guns and Armoured Trains and more!

Moderators: Lord Zimoa, MOD_Commander_The_Great_War

Post Reply
stormbringer3
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: Staunton, Va.

Armoured Train observation.

Post by stormbringer3 »

I have been really been enjoying this game and it's a real challenge playing the Central Powers. I find that The Russian Armoured Trains can just roll in behind your lines and can capture all sorts of cities way away from any front lines. I find it very unrealistic that a Russian train can just roll into Vienna, Berlin, etc. and capture them. Maybe WWI was different but in WWII games the Axis has to convert rail gauges since Axis and Soviet RR's didn't match. If they didn't match in WWI perhaps the Russians should have to control a Central power hex for a number of turns before the trains can use them.
Myrddraal
Posts: 335
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2012 7:41 am

RE: Armoured Train observation.

Post by Myrddraal »

Currently armoured trains get a very heavy movement penalty if moving through hexes controlled by the enemy. They move much, much faster within their own territory. This doesn't only simulate gauge differences, but also the fact that an armoured train can't race through enemy territory at full speed without the certainty of being derailed or ambushed.

Perhaps the movement penalty should be increased?
stormbringer3
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: Staunton, Va.

RE: Armoured Train observation.

Post by stormbringer3 »

Thank you for the quick response. Yes, I think you should increase the movement penalty. I'm having my best start yet vs. the Russians in 1914 but I have this train running around capturing cities behind my lines. It was 1 hex from Vienna so I had to pull a unit from the front to garrison the city. Right now it's sitting in Posen quite aways from the front and I had to move a unit, again from the front, because if I didn't Berlin would fall the next turn.
Thanks again.
User avatar
Lukas
Posts: 349
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 6:40 pm

RE: Armoured Train observation.

Post by Lukas »

remember that they are also quite vulnerable. Cut the rails on both ends with a unit and they have no where to escape. Then close in and kill it when its without supply.
Image
stormbringer3
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: Staunton, Va.

RE: Armoured Train observation.

Post by stormbringer3 »

Yes that is an excellent tactic. What the drawback IMO is that your forces are so thin already, having to pull troops from the front or create troops to cut off a train is a problem that should only rarely occur. However, if that's the way it is so be it.
Blubel
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:39 pm

RE: Armoured Train observation.

Post by Blubel »

Actually, if you can get it out of an city and close both rail lines, you can just watch it die, without taking casualties. You will however need 2 Garrion units.
I played one campaign until the end and the (AI) Russians did never build another one...
User avatar
IainMcNeil
Posts: 2784
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:01 am
Location: London
Contact:

RE: Armoured Train observation.

Post by IainMcNeil »

Letting them capture cities is definitely odd so upping the movement penalty in enemy territory seems sensible or even only letting them move to friendly hexes though that may be too limiting.
Iain McNeil
Director
Matrix Games
User avatar
wodin
Posts: 10709
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 3:13 am
Location: England
Contact:

RE: Armoured Train observation.

Post by wodin »

Maybe armoured trains at this sort of scale seems abit too tactical..also not sure if you should make i that an armoured train can't capture cities.
Tophat1815
Posts: 1824
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 4:11 pm

RE: Armoured Train observation.

Post by Tophat1815 »

I'd opt for the armoured trains being unable to capture cities myself,it's an infantryman's task not a special units role. Likewise tanks shouldn't be able to capture cities in this time-frame either. Just my 2 cents,haven't bought the game yet but its only a matter of time,probably today in fact.
User avatar
IainMcNeil
Posts: 2784
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:01 am
Location: London
Contact:

RE: Armoured Train observation.

Post by IainMcNeil »

Yes good point - I guess it represents an army with armoured train support not just the train. Same for tanks - its infantry with tank support as there was no such think as an armoured division.
Iain McNeil
Director
Matrix Games
Post Reply

Return to “Commander - The Great War”