
Note that even after this, it still doesn't say "Sunk"...
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
Post by TulliusDetritus »
ORIGINAL: Quixote
I'm assuming someone has seen better,
Post by geofflambert »
Post by Admiral Mitscher »
ORIGINAL: Quixote
I'm assuming someone has seen better, but this was a new one for me, going back even to WitP. Anyone ever seen seven?
Note that even after this, it still doesn't say "Sunk"...
ORIGINAL: fodder
The xAK Gorgan is only 2750 tons. That sub should not have fired six torps at it. What a waste of fish.
Post by KenchiSulla »
ORIGINAL: Cannonfodder
You guys are never happy... if the skipper shoots 4 torps and hits with 0 you are not happy, if he shoots 6 and hits with 6 you are not happy...
[:)]
Post by Bullwinkle58 »
ORIGINAL: Admiral Mitscher
I've noticed that Subs attacking on the surface, still fire multiple torpedoes! [:(]
ORIGINAL: RevRick
That and she was obviously carrying a $#!+load of ping pong balls - vital to the war effort!
Or ... what remains of the ship is still soaring through the air so there is nothing on the water to sink!ORIGINAL: ctangus
ORIGINAL: LoBaron
So, did she sink? [:D]
Captain Valentine of the xAK Gorgon reports that it was just a flesh wound...
![]()
Post by 1EyedJacks »
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
Or ... what remains of the ship is still soaring through the air so there is nothing on the water to sink!ORIGINAL: ctangus
ORIGINAL: LoBaron
So, did she sink? [:D]
Captain Valentine of the xAK Gorgon reports that it was just a flesh wound...
![]()
![]()
Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”