strategic losses?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
jmalter
Posts: 1673
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 5:41 pm

strategic losses?

Post by jmalter »

hope you'll forgive my ignorance, but i can't access the pdf Manual on my laptop, & google-search of this forum didn't help.

what are "strategic losses", how are they accrued, how do they influence the game?

my current intel screen shows that IJ has 36 points of them (30 Dec 43, DBB_B game vs. IJ AI).
User avatar
Quixote
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:34 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: strategic losses?

Post by Quixote »

I believe that's from strategic bombing of industry. Here's the section from the manual.

Image
Attachments
Stratpoints.jpg
Stratpoints.jpg (64.55 KiB) Viewed 201 times
jmalter
Posts: 1673
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 5:41 pm

RE: strategic losses?

Post by jmalter »

thanks, Quixote - it's good of you to post the relevant info to answer my question.

i've been bombing airfields & ports in Hokkaido w/ B-24s for about a month now. doubtless, bombs have strayed onto the city target & caused the industry damage.
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

RE: strategic losses?

Post by Icedawg »

I have a related question.

I've gotten the strategic VP message for ungarrisoned bases several times, but have noticed that no strategic victory points are showing up in the VP summary screen. Is this a bug, or am I missing some element here?
User avatar
JSG
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:48 am

RE: strategic losses?

Post by JSG »

There's a 1 point penalty when guerrillas attack a base with inadequate garrison assault value strength.

36 points would be a surprisingly small amount of such points in 1943, though. The AI tends to get multiple such points per day in my match against it.
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

RE: strategic losses?

Post by Icedawg »

That's what I'm getting at. I've had low garrisons dozens of times now, but my opponent is not getting any VPs for it. (Or it doesn't look like his is in the VP summary window.)

Image
Attachments
ForumPost.jpg
ForumPost.jpg (154.12 KiB) Viewed 201 times
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: strategic losses?

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: Icedawg

I have a related question.

I've gotten the strategic VP message for ungarrisoned bases several times, but have noticed that no strategic victory points are showing up in the VP summary screen. Is this a bug, or am I missing some element here?

So far as I know strategic VPs are only awarded for City attacks which meet the reqs. of the manual quote up-thread. Ungarrisoned VPs are "regular" VPs. To tell the truth I've never looked to see where they accrue. Bases controlled lines would be my guess, but I've never studied it.
The Moose
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

RE: strategic losses?

Post by Icedawg »

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

ORIGINAL: Icedawg

I have a related question.

I've gotten the strategic VP message for ungarrisoned bases several times, but have noticed that no strategic victory points are showing up in the VP summary screen. Is this a bug, or am I missing some element here?

So far as I know strategic VPs are only awarded for City attacks which meet the reqs. of the manual quote up-thread. Ungarrisoned VPs are "regular" VPs. To tell the truth I've never looked to see where they accrue. Bases controlled lines would be my guess, but I've never studied it.

Thanks. That would explain it.
User avatar
traskott
Posts: 1577
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:30 am
Location: Valladolid, Spain

RE: strategic losses?

Post by traskott »

Japan get no VP for strategic attack on India ? Damm... xDDD 2 weeks of night bombings spent.
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: strategic losses?

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: traskott

Japan get no VP for strategic attack on India ? Damm... xDDD 2 weeks of night bombings spent.

Nope.

See the AAR in the Canoerebel/PH game, PH side.
The Moose
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”