IJA fighter research/production plans?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
abulbulian
Posts: 1105
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:42 pm

IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by abulbulian »

Just curious what people are producing/researching for 42, 43, 44, 45 as far as fighters go with the IJA? For the IJN it doesn't look like there are many choices on which way to go.

Thanks for any thoughts. Not looking for any particular details, just some friendly advice for a noob Japanese player starting a campaign.

Thanks in advance for any tips/advice.
- Beta Tester WitE and ATG
- Alpha/Beta Tester WitW and WitE2

"Invincibility lies in the defence; the possibility of victory in the attack." - Sun Tzu
Numdydar
Posts: 3283
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:56 pm

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by Numdydar »

Franks and Tojos are what you need to concetrate on for the bulk of your AF.
User avatar
koniu
Posts: 2763
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:19 pm
Location: Konin, Poland, European Union

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by koniu »

For `42

Army: Get Ki-44IIa Tojo asap and start r&D IIc version for armor(you can skip building IIb)
Navy: asap upgrade to A6M3a Zero

For `43 `44
Army: Ki-44IIc Tojo and Ki-84 Frank
Navy A6M5 Zero and N1K George

`45
Army: Nakajima Ki-201
Navy: A7M2 Sam

Of course it all depends if you playing PDU on or off. With off You must focus on production of other fighters also

EDIT: change of `45 army model
"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by GreyJoy »

ORIGINAL: koniu

For `42

Army: Get Ki-44IIa Tojo asap and start r&D IIc version for armor(you can skip building IIb)
Navy: asap upgrade to A6M3a Zero

For `43 `44
Army: Ki-44IIc Tojo and Ki-84 Frank
Navy A6M5 Zero and N1K George

`45
Army: Nakajima Ki-201
Navy: A7M2 Sam

Of course it all depends if you playing PDU on or off. With off You must focus on production of other fighters also

EDIT: change of `45 army model

Don't forget the KI-45 Nick. It comes online in mid 42 and it has armour and a 20mm cannon, which is something all the other japanese aircrafts don't have untill 1943.
Agree with Koniu for the rest, except for the fact that in late war contest the Ki-201 isn't your best choice IMHO. Yes, it's fast, no surprise, but its range is limited and those 30mm cannons aren't that accurate (they aren't CL but F, which makes all the difference). Believe me: the best late war jap all around plane is the KI-83. I've faced them... deadly

The Sam is good obviously...but it comes online so late that i doubt it's worth to invest so much in that production line...They will fall like flies against the sweeping hordes of P-47s exactly like the Zeros... and as ablative armour they are just as good as the Oscars IV... so why bother?
User avatar
koniu
Posts: 2763
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:19 pm
Location: Konin, Poland, European Union

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by koniu »

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
Don't forget the KI-45 Nick. It comes online in mid 42 and it has armour and a 20mm cannon, which is something all the other japanese aircrafts don't have untill 1943.
Agree with Koniu for the rest, except for the fact that in late war contest the Ki-201 isn't your best choice IMHO. Yes, it's fast, no surprise, but its range is limited and those 30mm cannons aren't that accurate (they aren't CL but F, which makes all the difference). Believe me: the best late war jap all around plane is the KI-83. I've faced them... deadly

The Sam is good obviously...but it comes online so late that i doubt it's worth to invest so much in that production line...They will fall like flies against the sweeping hordes of P-47s exactly like the Zeros... and as ablative armour they are just as good as the Oscars IV... so why bother?

So You telling Ki-83. I will need to look at his stats when back home.
"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"
janh
Posts: 1215
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:06 pm

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by janh »

I also try to develop the Ki-45 Nick as a 4EB hunter. The past the KAIb type the later versions at least on paper look somewhat useful if covered with single-engined fighters. I use them also in the night-fighter role against nuissance bombing, and also in ground attack. The 20mm or 37mm guns on the earlier types is more of psychological importance, though.
Probably unquestionably the Frank is still a better fighter, also better in the bomber killer role, and requires only one engine, but the Nick can be useful as well. It is quite durable, at least in stats.
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by GreyJoy »

ORIGINAL: janh

I also try to develop the Ki-45 Nick as a 4EB hunter. The past the KAIb type the later versions at least on paper look somewhat useful if covered with single-engined fighters. I use them also in the night-fighter role against nuissance bombing, and also in ground attack. The 20mm or 37mm guns on the earlier types is more of psychological importance, though.
Probably unquestionably the Frank is still a better fighter, also better in the bomber killer role, and requires only one engine, but the Nick can be useful as well. It is quite durable, at least in stats.

The only good Nick is the "A" version.
Clearly when the Frank comes online (late 43 at best) the Nick is obsolete in every role, but untill that date, you only have KI-44a or KI-61 to tangle with the enemy bombers...and none of them is armoured, nor they have any cannon... so the Nick is a valuable asset for the well over a year. Then those fighter bomber groups can be upgraded to the KI-109b (if i'm not mistaken), which is the best FB Japan has for the second part of the war. Once again a decent bomber killer
User avatar
Grfin Zeppelin
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Germany

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by Grfin Zeppelin »

The later Nick versions are good low ground / low Naval attackers. I leave it to you if that is desirable or not. I tend to stick with the Nick A.

Image
User avatar
Miller
Posts: 2227
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:14 am
Location: Ashington, England.

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by Miller »

IMO you need a fighter with 4 x 20MM Cannon to dent the Allied 4E hordes........hence the George is the best choice, especially the -2 model which has a service rating of 2.
User avatar
abulbulian
Posts: 1105
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:42 pm

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by abulbulian »

Looks like the N1K1-J George is the best for combating the allies HB threat? So TOJOs for Army?
- Beta Tester WitE and ATG
- Alpha/Beta Tester WitW and WitE2

"Invincibility lies in the defence; the possibility of victory in the attack." - Sun Tzu
User avatar
koniu
Posts: 2763
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:19 pm
Location: Konin, Poland, European Union

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by koniu »

ORIGINAL: abulbulian

Looks like the N1K1-J George is the best for combating the allies HB threat? So TOJOs for Army?

Yes. George(mostly N1K2 with SR 2) for navy, until Sam show up. And Tojo for Army until Frank(b version is the best against bombers) show up.
In early months of war Ki-45a will work also

What You need to fight HB is firepower, armor and numbers
"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"
SenToku
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:48 pm

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by SenToku »

Option for IJA - Forget Frank. Even at best model, Ki-84 is still service rating 3 plane and needs huge investment on ground in aviation support.

Instead IJA can start research for Ki-61-Ia. Once fully repaired, move the research forward along Tony line, until you get your aviation people to believe that copying a liquid cooled DB-601 (Ha-60) is a bad idea and air cooled Mitsubishi Kinsei (Ha-33) is ONLY engine for the otherwise fine airframe of Tony.

That means you get the Ki-100-II into full research mode with 500 engines in pool by late 1942 and plane into production by mid/late 1943. Far surperior to Frank in altitude (expect the -r model), but appearing earlier, Ki-100 is one of the best interceptors you can get. As service rating 1 plane it can fully replace the Ki-44 as front line fighter (something Frank can't do).
User avatar
koniu
Posts: 2763
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:19 pm
Location: Konin, Poland, European Union

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by koniu »

Without Frank You can forget about surviving late war battles.
Modern Allied fighters F4U, P-47 will eat Ki-100 for breakfast. Frank is only figtrer capable of resistance.

I am not telling that K-100 cant be useful but Frank is must have type of plane.
Also Ki-100 is not much better from Tojo so i will not expect much better result with it.

Ask any alied player who played PBEM in `44, `45, What they will fear more 100 Franks or 200 Ki-100 in air.

"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"
janh
Posts: 1215
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:06 pm

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by janh »

What do you think about night fighters, esp. those with upwards pointing guns/cannons? So far I never bothered much and just used standard fighters to interrupt nightly raids, but maybe it's worth to invest something there, too?

User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by GreyJoy »

ORIGINAL: koniu

Without Frank You can forget about surviving late war battles.
Modern Allied fighters F4U, P-47 will eat Ki-100 for breakfast. Frank is only figtrer capable of resistance.

I am not telling that K-100 cant be useful but Frank is must have type of plane.
Also Ki-100 is not much better from Tojo so i will not expect much better result with it.

Ask any alied player who played PBEM in `44, `45, What they will fear more 100 Franks or 200 Ki-100 in air.


The KI-100 ha a 20mm cannon CL...which is way good!
However the KI-100 is slow (only 360 mph) and it occupies entirely a production line, so i don't consider it a good choice.

The KI-84b is probably the best IJA single-engine fighter you can get...unfortunately, like the KI-83, it has a unique R&D line[:(]
SenToku
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:48 pm

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by SenToku »

ORIGINAL: koniu

Without Frank You can forget about surviving late war battles.
Modern Allied fighters F4U, P-47 will eat Ki-100 for breakfast. Frank is only figtrer capable of resistance.

I am not telling that K-100 cant be useful but Frank is must have type of plane.
Also Ki-100 is not much better from Tojo so i will not expect much better result with it.

Ask any alied player who played PBEM in `44, `45, What they will fear more 100 Franks or 200 Ki-100 in air.


I would think that the need of huge aribase would limit Ki-84 over Ki-100.

In Downfall scenario, most Franks end up grounded after 4-5 days of fighting with service/repair times over 6 days, while service rating 1 planes keep fighting even with damaged airbase.

The need for aviation support would also mean that they can not be disperced in multiple small satelite airfields, which makes them rather easy targets for enemy aiming at their airbase.

Or is there some way to keep Franks in the air I do not know?

As for top of the line allied fighters; To my knowledge no Japanese fighter (outside some experimental last war year models) can take the P-47 1:1 on altitude, but I feel I have better chances of getting Ki-100s into air at 4:1 against them than getting Ki-84 at 2:1.
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3749
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by Captain Cruft »

Oscars and Nicks are superb low-level bombers.

The key to the late war is to avoid wherever possible taking on the Allied fighters with your own since you just can't compete. Try to engineer situations where you can get at the bombers. Any fighters (Nates/Claudes excepted) can make a mess of bombers given good pilots and numbers. The Ki-83 is particularly awesome though.
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by crsutton »

Take it from an Allied fanboy. You are going to need to keep producing some low service rated fighters for front line point defense and escort service. I like nothing better than taking on high service rating top line fighters at isolated forward bases. It just becomes a kill fest after a few sweeps and all those Franks and Georges are sitting on the tarmac out of service.

When Allied bombers begin to dominate, service ratings become very important for Japanese aircraft. We AFBs learn this early on when we are trying to defend with buffalos, P40s and lightnings vs overwhelming numbers.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

Sometime ago, I read somewhere in this forum that:
Frank --> for airbases with "rail"
Tojo --> point defense for isolated airbases
Oscar --> for escort, in masses

But at the slow pace of my game vs AI, I will not find out soon
User avatar
jzardos
Posts: 677
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 1:05 pm

RE: IJA fighter research/production plans?

Post by jzardos »

What are the better night fighters that Japan can make in 42? 43? 44-45?

Thanks
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”