Hairy Asian Experiences - GreyJoy (J) vs. Q-Ball (A)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by obvert »

You're doing well on HI. Your fuel and oil look decent. Well don egetting your armaments and vehicles sorted and saving so much HI during 42.
The KI84a, despite the heavy investment in terms of factories, hasn't see yet a fully repaired factory. However we're close and so we'll soon start to advance it. You would notice the heavy investment both on the KI-84a and KI-84b. The idea is to get the KI-84a by july 1943, the KI-84r and the KI-84b by the first half of 1944.

That's very early!! It would be great to have it then. Just getting them now in 11/43 in mine.

I'd say your R n D looks great for a first game, but also very good for any game based on your stated intent. You will be getting most of the important 44 models in mid-to-late 43. That should keep you in a more balanced air war.

Looks like for NF you're going with whatever comes along and taking them as they arrive. One thing I did not do which I should have done is to keep some Ha-31 engines for the Ki-45 KAId NF version that uses them. I won't be making any of those. I did invest in the Ki-102c Randy (started late after realizing it's not on a line with the other Ki-102 models), and the very late S1A1 Denko. As it looks like my game might still be going then I hope these can do something against 4Es, but I don't have much hope for them really being effective. Still I want to try them out.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by GreyJoy »

In my experience during the previous game, night fighters are useless, no matter the model. The 4Es, at night, are snipers. You will lose more NFs to A2A combat than what you take with you to hell. It's really useless to invest on them. I simply wait for them to come online and will fill the Night fighter dedicated sentais. Nothing more.For sure i won't invest in R&D for them...i'm just keeping some R&D factories going on for 3 NF models so that i don't have to change a production factory for them in the future.
 
What i've learnt about the R&D is that you heavily invest on a model, or it's better not to research it at all and wait for it to come online naturally.
I'd love to have R&D factories researching the jet models...but you need at least 3x30 factories for each model and at least 3x30 factories R&D the dedicated engine...which means a lot less resources dedicated to R&D and produce earlier airframes (say KI-84, N1K, J2M, KI-67-T, Frances etc) and engines.
The Engine part is vital imho. You need to focus on the engine bonus, which can really boost your R&D efforts. Ha-45 is critical imho. You must R&D it immediately so to start stockpiling them very early by mid-42. My goal is to keep on having 1000 stockpiled HA-45 untill the Frank-b arrives.
So you must plan to have, by mid-42, always >600 Ha-34, Ha-45, Ha-33 and Ha-32. These are the key-egines imho.
Ha-44 is a waste but you need it for the first Jill...but only for it and it comes online so early (easily by 1/43) that you barely need to produce 300 of them before the second Jill arrives (which uses the Ha-32...and that's why you need to have the >500 Ha-32 so that the second jills arrives very early).
I keep on producing the Ha-31 for the Dinah-II and for the Topsy which are very usefull planes.
 
The recon Irving has been cancelled. The recon Judy is just as good and it only uses 1 Aichi-60 engine...that is also used for the first Judy.
So i'm producing 100 Aichi-60 in order to produce 90 Judys and some 10 recon Judy...with some stockpiled i plan to convert the Aichi-60 factories to Ha-45 as soon as the Third Judy comes online. This uses the Ha-33...which you need to stockpile to boost the R&D with the engine bonus.
 
 
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by ny59giants »

Airframe upgrades and replacements are based on three factors. If there are others, then I cannot recall them. AF size, supplies (20k or better) and being within transfer range. That is why some of you get the ability to upgrade or get replacement for your longer legged planes.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20695
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by BBfanboy »

Uh-oh ... there is a green unit dot on Tsuyung indicating US troops. Any intel on the unit(s) there?
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by GreyJoy »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Uh-oh ... there is a green unit dot on Tsuyung indicating US troops. Any intel on the unit(s) there?


Jan 13, 1943

No, we don't know which unit is that one...i bet some base force unit or something like that

Everything's quiet today, a part some 103 Tojos, followed by 30 Oscars IIa that swept Kunming. We faced some 55 between P-40Es and P-39s...and we obtained a great victory: 40 enemy downed for only 7 of ours! Some more days like this and the resistance over the skies of Western China will be over. 200 Helens are ready to start to bomb back to stoneage Kunming...some more weeks and we'll begin! Banzai!

He landed at Bathrust Island and started to develop that base...
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20695
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by BBfanboy »

Looks like a lot of HI points allocated to vehicles, which the Allies can knock off quite easily [except the Chinese]. By 1943 even Indian infantry units have some anti-tank weapons better than the Boyes rifle. I have no idea if you can make use of some of those points elsewhere, though![&:]
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by GreyJoy »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Looks like a lot of HI points allocated to vehicles, which the Allies can knock off quite easily [except the Chinese]. By 1943 even Indian infantry units have some anti-tank weapons better than the Boyes rifle. I have no idea if you can make use of some of those points elsewhere, though![&:]


A lot? "only" 20,000...and i stopped producing them for quite some months now... but there are lots of tank units coming in the next years, so i wanna be ready to fulfill those divisions
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Looks like a lot of HI points allocated to vehicles, which the Allies can knock off quite easily [except the Chinese]. By 1943 even Indian infantry units have some anti-tank weapons better than the Boyes rifle. I have no idea if you can make use of some of those points elsewhere, though![&:]


A lot? "only" 20,000...and i stopped producing them for quite some months now... but there are lots of tank units coming in the next years, so i wanna be ready to fulfill those divisions

They are also needed for any motorized support, which can be a lot for the arrivals in 44-45. I would say 20k is low ultimately, but I'm just getting to the point where I'll begin to really use them, so I'm not sure yet. Depends on if anything gets completely destroyed also that needs buying back and rebuilding.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20695
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by BBfanboy »

Thanks for the reply GJ and obvert. I am trying to understand some of the Japanese economy and you have given some benchmarks on how much HI is involved in vehicle production. If I ever go over to the dark side I want to have some of the skills necessary. My evil laugh is pretty good now! [:D]
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by GreyJoy »

Jan 14, 15 1943
 
We had another huge battle over Kunming. This time the odds were more equal, with the allies losing 40 planes against 33 of mine. Some good pilots were lost today, but luckly we can efford to lose IJA pilots and Tojos...we have plenty in the pools!
We also tried to attack the strongpoint east of Kunming....and obtained a 1-3....but losses are more or less equal so i'm confident that, as soon as we clear the skies from the enemy's planes, our bombers will be able to do their magic
 
Brad also started to bomb Saumlaki, north of Darwin. More units are enorute for Kendari. We'll shift them to the outer bases as soon as they arrive. We're gaining precious time here...i don't think he'll be able to move before Darwin reaches level 9 AF
 
The real news of the day comes from the intel... for three times in a row we got an "heavy radio transmission volume" coming from Pago Pago.... and i know what it means... TABIUTEA. I'm pretty sure now he's trying to drive my attention to the southern DEI in order to get a free shot there in CENTPAC. We've issued orders and in few days we'll be able to meet him[8D]. Mavis and Emilies are patrolling from Tarawa...i will see him coming with at least 2-3 days in advance...and that's enough for me
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by GreyJoy »

While i do agree with Cribtop and the others who have argued that, between CENTPAC and DEI i should always chose to defend the DEI, i also believe that an easy breakthrough in CENTPAC is something Japan should always try to avoid in 1943.
If he manages to get to Tabiutea without a scratch and stabilish a foothold there, the whole GAP between my dominions in the Solomons/NG and the Marshalls will be in danger.
From Taboutea he can easily shut down everything up to Maloaep, and move easily to Nauru Island, Kusiae and then Ponape. Once there, Rabaul becomes useless and the Mariannas get really really close.
On the contrary, in the DEI, while i know i cannot defend everything, he also knows he cannot shut down everything at will. Too many bases mean a double edge sword: the defender cannot cover every base, but the attacker cannot shut down every base in range.
My oil fields are still far from its bases and untill he gets in range of the P-38s, a couple of Nick Sentais can easily bring havoc among his 4Es. Soon we'll have hordes of N1K1s and so i'm not sweating that much.
Moreover, i know he needs the CVs to advance in the CENTPAC, while he doesn't in the DEI. If i have to look for a battle, CENTPAC is where i want to fight. Makin is an important LBA base, with plenty of AA and an Air HQ.
 
Another indicator that tells me TABIUTEA is a target is that he, after having reconned with dedicated planes for months now (the DL has always been 9/9), it suddenly dropped to 0/0... which is exactly what i've done against RAder to hide my will of invading the Kuriles...[;)]
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by GreyJoy »

Oh, and however i'm not forgetting the Kuriles. I'm buyin, slowly, a divisions from Manchuria to be sent there as soon as the Blizzard ends. With the equivalent of 3 Divisions, spread among 5 bases, 6 AA units, 10 base forces, 3 Arty bns, 1 Army HQ and 1 Air HQ, and with forts everywhere up to 4, i think the whole area can be called safe for the upcoming year
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by obvert »

Mavis and Emilies are patrolling from Tarawa...i will see him coming with at least 2-3 days in advance...and that's enough for me

What kind of response do you plan? Surface or air strikes or both?
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by GreyJoy »

ORIGINAL: obvert
Mavis and Emilies are patrolling from Tarawa...i will see him coming with at least 2-3 days in advance...and that's enough for me

What kind of response do you plan? Surface or air strikes or both?

I'm moving 150 Betties from Kendari, 27 Kates and 60 Judys from Truk and some 120 fighters from Rabaul and Kendari (will take 3/4 turns to get there cause i don't wanna lose planes and precious crack pilots due to extreme long range travels). a strong SCTF is waiting at Rabaul for confirmation. Then it could be in place in 3 days. I have an AO TF waiting near Kusiae Island to refuel the KB is i decide to move it there. For the moment i'm placing it between Bab and Truk, waiting for some confirmations. Minelayers are already waiting at Makin.
A para Bn and a SNLF unit are ready at Tarawa to be airlifted at Tabiutea as soon as the enemy is spotted advancing. Their task won't be to stop the enemy, but to delay it for a couple of days. I just need to buy the time needed for the KB to arrive at flank speed.. The key, as always, will be early detection. Emilies and Mavis can do that job pretty well, but i've also dispatched 2 Glenn-Equipped subs and some more Dinas from the Solomons...i need to be sure before ordering a general movement.

Once again, the idea isn't to stop him, but to finally make him pay for his gains.

User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by obvert »

Wow. That is a lot! Do you have that much air support troops there? I don't think I could base 240 bombers and 120 fighters in the area and make any of them fly en masse at all.

I'm looking forward to seeing this happen. I hope your hunch is right and we get some fireworks![:)]

If you do have the KB near Truk, it seems at least a slow cruise East could get going now to reduce days at flank. Also, if you have any of those dots in the Elice islands you could fly a bit of air support there with a small Jake detachment to get a good early look.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by GreyJoy »

ORIGINAL: obvert

Wow. That is a lot! Do you have that much air support troops there? I don't think I could base 240 bombers and 120 fighters in the area and make any of them fly en masse at all.

I'm looking forward to seeing this happen. I hope your hunch is right and we get some fireworks![:)]

If you do have the KB near Truk, it seems at least a slow cruise East could get going now to reduce days at flank. Also, if you have any of those dots in the Elice islands you could fly a bit of air support there with a small Jake detachment to get a good early look.


Well, i have Makin that has nearly 200 AS and can support 200 planes (lvl 4 AF), and Tarawa which is a lvl 3 AF that can support 150 planes. So i think i can handle those numbers pretty easily. Consider that i also have Maloaep and Roi Namur that both have an air HQ and can be used to base planes in reserve.

No, i won't move my KB any further for the moment. At least not untill i know if i'm just casting shadows (as i have been doing for the whole game now). Fuel is too precious and every time i move the KB there's a chance that it gets spotted by a radio message or a lucky sub.

Unfortunately i don't own anything south of Tabiutea
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: obvert

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Looks like a lot of HI points allocated to vehicles, which the Allies can knock off quite easily [except the Chinese]. By 1943 even Indian infantry units have some anti-tank weapons better than the Boyes rifle. I have no idea if you can make use of some of those points elsewhere, though![&:]


A lot? "only" 20,000...and i stopped producing them for quite some months now... but there are lots of tank units coming in the next years, so i wanna be ready to fulfill those divisions

They are also needed for any motorized support, which can be a lot for the arrivals in 44-45. I would say 20k is low ultimately, but I'm just getting to the point where I'll begin to really use them, so I'm not sure yet. Depends on if anything gets completely destroyed also that needs buying back and rebuilding.

By 1944, Japanese tank units get smashed on a regular basis in regular combat. Every Allied unit has such great AT values by then. So, if you plan on using them, you had better stockpile points as you will frequently have to rebuild them. From the Allied side I would say that they are still important. You have got to have mobile forces to rush and block Allied turning movements such as invasions in your rear.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by GreyJoy »

ORIGINAL: crsutton

ORIGINAL: obvert

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy





A lot? "only" 20,000...and i stopped producing them for quite some months now... but there are lots of tank units coming in the next years, so i wanna be ready to fulfill those divisions

They are also needed for any motorized support, which can be a lot for the arrivals in 44-45. I would say 20k is low ultimately, but I'm just getting to the point where I'll begin to really use them, so I'm not sure yet. Depends on if anything gets completely destroyed also that needs buying back and rebuilding.

By 1944, Japanese tank units get smashed on a regular basis in regular combat. Every Allied unit has such great AT values by then. So, if you plan on using them, you had better stockpile points as you will frequently have to rebuild them. From the Allied side I would say that they are still important. You have got to have mobile forces to rush and block Allied turning movements such as invasions in your rear.

Well, surely my tanks won't be able to do much, but better than nothing anyway! At least those 3 Tank Divisions have already been bought out to the Southern Command HQ so they can be moved out of China pretty fast once i decide to do it


Jan 16, 17, 1943

Nothing happened, except for his 4Es that are starting to bomb my troops in Western China...

The only news of the day is a puzzling one...

My Naval Search (both Emilies from Munda and Glenns near the coast) told me that a huge convoy, containing APA/AKAs and BBs has left Sydney and is proceeding north along the coast.
At the same time at Darwin several APs are spotted and, again, the usual Heavy Volume Radio Transmission message tells me something is up at Pago Pago....

What to do?[&:] I need to be sure that those at Darwin are real APs and not simple xAPs and gotta be certain that those north of Syndey are LSI (or APA) and not only normal transports... But what is he up to at Pago so? I can't believe he has yet the naval capacity to mount up two different large scale operations (Northern Oz and CENTPAC)...but Brad has already shown me he doesn't dislike the idea of using xAPs and xAKs for amphib operations when it's needed... I feel like a Donkey among two balls of hay...[8|]

Image
Attachments
OZ.jpg
OZ.jpg (245 KiB) Viewed 230 times
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by ny59giants »

AP convert to APA in 2/43, not before. Then they trickle in as reinforcements.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: ONE YEAR OF WAR

Post by GreyJoy »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

AP convert to APA in 2/43, not before. Then they trickle in as reinforcements.

mmm... so those could be real LSI (the british version of APAs, righ?)...and those at Darwin real APs...but why risking them now when he's only 10 days from the upgrade date???

Well, i need more confirms...as always i'm hunting shadows for the moment
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”