Gamey or legit tactics?

[sanderz]

Hi

I am playing as the Japanese versus the AI and i am wondering if the following are OK or if considered a bit gamey:-

1) Ship upgrades : i have been changing repairing ships back to pierside to free up repair yard space

2) Troops in the territory near the Russian border (am at work at the moment and can’t recall the HQ) : Can you move these troops into the main fight against China without paying PPs. I haven’t been doing this (just assumed you couldn’t), however reading some AARs some seem to have a lot more troops in China than I do. (I am aware there are garrison requirements)

many thanks


PS - any other things like this?

[Puhis]

1) Everyone does that.

2) Usually people pay PPs to move units across borders. AI doesn't care, but do you really need extra help vs. AI?

[tigercub]

1. not gamey many times and a lot of time ship were repaired that way but it slower anyway.

2.not sure

[sanderz]

thanks guys

i'm trying not to get into bad habits playing the ai and only use those that would be acceptable in a PBEM game

with regard to paying PPs to move units into China are you saying this is a very common house rule?

thanks

[fcharton]

ORIGINAL: sanderz
with regard to paying PPs to move units into China are you saying this is a very common house rule?

It is pretty common, but by no means a standard. You will find many PBEM games without this restriction.

Usually, it is formulated as : restricted troops cannot cross borders (maybe with a few exceptions for Thai units), and it cuts both ways. You can't move the Kwantung army into China (and you will be short of artillery, tanks, and engineers in China) or the China Expeditionnary force into Indochina and Burma. On the other hand, the Allies can't retreat Chinese troops into Burma, or move restricted Commonwealth troops into Burma.

Francois

[Empire101]

ORIGINAL: sanderz

thanks guys

i'm trying not to get into bad habits playing the ai and only use those that would be acceptable in a PBEM game

with regard to paying PPs to move units into China are you saying this is a very common house rule?

thanks

If you get into the habit of paying for your units, it makes it much easier to play against a human Allied opponent who wishes to impose this more than reasonable HR to the game.
I always apply it to my games whether the Allied player wants it or not.

[PaxMondo]

ORIGINAL: fcharton

ORIGINAL: sanderz
with regard to paying PPs to move units into China are you saying this is a very common house rule?

It is pretty common, but by no means a standard. You will find many PBEM games without this restriction.

Usually, it is formulated as : restricted troops cannot cross borders (maybe with a few exceptions for Thai units), and it cuts both ways. You can't move the Kwantung army into China (and you will be short of artillery, tanks, and engineers in China) or the China Expeditionnary force into Indochina and Burma. On the other hand, the Allies can't retreat Chinese troops into Burma, or move restricted Commonwealth troops into Burma.

Francois

+1

I only play against AI and always use the HR. Of course, my opponent blithely ignores all of our HR's. [:D]

[witpqs]

Against the AI of course you can do what you want, but against a human opponent:

ORIGINAL: sanderz

Hi

I am playing as the Japanese versus the AI and i am wondering if the following are OK or if considered a bit gamey:-

1) Ship upgrades : i have been changing repairing ships back to pierside to free up repair yard space
I do not do this as I consider it gamey. The answers above are the first that I have heard "everyone does that." My view is that the upgrade requires a shipyard of a certain size and that implies it should be carried out there, not just triggered or started there. When you play a human consult with your opponent to gain a mutual understanding.
2) Troops in the territory near the Russian border (am at work at the moment and can’t recall the HQ) : Can you move these troops into the main fight against China without paying PPs. I haven’t been doing this (just assumed you couldn’t), however reading some AARs some seem to have a lot more troops in China than I do. (I am aware there are garrison requirements)
Most opponents would consider this gamey, but it depends on the agreemnt with your opponent and certainly any specific HRs. Many of us restrict ourselves on some things without explicit HRs, like your first question above.
many thanks


PS - any other things like this?

[Bullwinkle58]

ORIGINAL: sanderz

Hi

I am playing as the Japanese versus the AI and i am wondering if the following are OK or if considered a bit gamey:-

1) Ship upgrades : i have been changing repairing ships back to pierside to free up repair yard space

2) Troops in the territory near the Russian border (am at work at the moment and can’t recall the HQ) : Can you move these troops into the main fight against China without paying PPs. I haven’t been doing this (just assumed you couldn’t), however reading some AARs some seem to have a lot more troops in China than I do. (I am aware there are garrison requirements)

1. I have done real life ship upgrades and not only is what you suggest not "gamey" (I hate that word), but it is common in real navies. The requirement to have a certain size shipyard to trigger an upgrade is so the shop facilities and skilled trades are present, not drydocks. Unless hull work or work which compromises watertight integrity is planned any work can usually be done pierside if crane services are there. Certainly AA and sensor work can be. The same yard workers who would work in drydock simply walk down the pier and board the vessel to do tthe job. The upgrade can't be done on some remote island without the skilled workforce, but very few of the upgrades in the game would in real life require a drydock.

2. I would never play a game with HRs, although out of all the standard set this rule is the one with the most reasonable dev-level underpinnings. Border code was a feature set never finished. But as has been said here it works pro and con for both players, and the Allies can lose all of China and still handily win the game. Every move has an opportunity cost.

[witpqs]

1. I have done real life ship upgrades and not only is what you suggest not "gamey" (I hate that word), but it is common in real navies. The requirement to have a certain size shipyard to trigger an upgrade is so the shop facilities and skilled trades are present, not drydocks. Unless hull work or work which compromises watertight integrity is planned any work can usually be done pierside if crane services are there. Certainly AA and sensor work can be. The same yard workers who would work in drydock simply walk down the pier and board the vessel to do tthe job. The upgrade can't be done on some remote island without the skilled workforce, but very few of the upgrades in the game would in real life require a drydock.

I appreciate hearing this, Moose. I can modify my play on that point.

[Empire101]

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


But as has been said here it works pro and con for both players, and the Allies can lose all of China and still handily win the game. Every move has an opportunity cost.

I've never seen one of my opponents come back from the dead after the loss of China....Auto Victory kicks in and the Allied player usually comes to the 'Negotiating Table'.....

[SpitfireIX]

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

1. I have done real life ship upgrades and not only is what you suggest not "gamey" (I hate that word), but it is common in real navies. The requirement to have a certain size shipyard to trigger an upgrade is so the shop facilities and skilled trades are present, not drydocks. Unless hull work or work which compromises watertight integrity is planned any work can usually be done pierside if crane services are there. Certainly AA and sensor work can be. The same yard workers who would work in drydock simply walk down the pier and board the vessel to do tthe job. The upgrade can't be done on some remote island without the skilled workforce, but very few of the upgrades in the game would in real life require a drydock.

And those that would are the ones that cause damage that requires a drydock in the game.

[Bullwinkle58]

ORIGINAL: witpqs

1. I have done real life ship upgrades and not only is what you suggest not "gamey" (I hate that word), but it is common in real navies. The requirement to have a certain size shipyard to trigger an upgrade is so the shop facilities and skilled trades are present, not drydocks. Unless hull work or work which compromises watertight integrity is planned any work can usually be done pierside if crane services are there. Certainly AA and sensor work can be. The same yard workers who would work in drydock simply walk down the pier and board the vessel to do tthe job. The upgrade can't be done on some remote island without the skilled workforce, but very few of the upgrades in the game would in real life require a drydock.

I appreciate hearing this, Moose. I can modify my play on that point.

For further info, in the USN the type of upgrades seen in the game are done under two "regimes"--SHIPALTS and ORDALTS. The relevant command level, usually NAVSEA but sometimes a specialized command such as that for SSBNs, issues the package and specs and schedules around operational commitments to do the work. Sometimes it's depot level (tenders and shoreside IMAs), and sometimes it's shipyard. Very often "tiger teams" of senior shipyard wokers travel to the ship and do the work in a rapid manner while pierside in a port with limited shop support. We had all of our missile compartment middle level berthing ripped out and reinstalled in a new configuration, down to bunk lights and curtains, by a tiger team from Newport News Shipbuilding while alongside the pier in Port Canaveral, Fla. Took them less than 48 hours to strip the area down to hull ribs and build it back. The most efficient team I have ever seen build anything in any environment. And really nice guys too. They did some unfunded side jobs in the galley just for some off-the-books chow; they were almost all retired fleet sailors.

SHIPALTS and ORDALTS can be something as simple as changing electrical connectors because the old ones deteriorated faster than the prime contractor claimed up to installing a new defense system or a whole new sonar.

[Bullwinkle58]

ORIGINAL: Empire101

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


But as has been said here it works pro and con for both players, and the Allies can lose all of China and still handily win the game. Every move has an opportunity cost.

I've never seen one of my opponents come back from the dead after the loss of China....Auto Victory kicks in and the Allied player usually comes to the 'Negotiating Table'.....

Talk to Greyjoy.

[Bullwinkle58]

ORIGINAL: SpitfireIX

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

1. I have done real life ship upgrades and not only is what you suggest not "gamey" (I hate that word), but it is common in real navies. The requirement to have a certain size shipyard to trigger an upgrade is so the shop facilities and skilled trades are present, not drydocks. Unless hull work or work which compromises watertight integrity is planned any work can usually be done pierside if crane services are there. Certainly AA and sensor work can be. The same yard workers who would work in drydock simply walk down the pier and board the vessel to do tthe job. The upgrade can't be done on some remote island without the skilled workforce, but very few of the upgrades in the game would in real life require a drydock.

And those that would are the ones that cause damage that requires a drydock in the game.

I haven't done a complete census. I have seen radar and AA upgrades default into Shipyard on the first day of the upgrade. Neither needs a drydock.

[SpitfireIX]

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


I haven't done a complete census. I have seen radar and AA upgrades default into Shipyard on the first day of the upgrade. Neither needs a drydock.

I should have clarified what I meant. I was trying to say that some upgrades cause damage that can only be repaired at a shipyard (or in some minor cases, more slowly by an AR).

[Bullwinkle58]

ORIGINAL: SpitfireIX

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


I haven't done a complete census. I have seen radar and AA upgrades default into Shipyard on the first day of the upgrade. Neither needs a drydock.

I should have clarified what I meant. I was trying to say that some upgrades cause damage that can only be repaired at a shipyard (or in some minor cases, more slowly by an AR).

Oh, OK. I completely agree. Where speed is changed and main engines need to accesssed, usually endurance upgrades (new tanks), and very major superstructure alts you'd need a drydock. Probably a lot of the carrier stuff too just for height. In WWII it was fairly normal for drydocks to have the major overhead cranes and piers less so. (Building yards an exception.)

I think the devs did a fantastic job inside the engine of stratifying mode capabilities and making drydocks a bottleneck as they should be. But I also think a lot of players who don't put a lot of attention into ship repair underutilize their assets by just sticking everything in the drydock and walking away. Even ship's force/readiness repairs have a major role in the overall models. Just because it will go in the drydock doesn't mean it should.

[dr.hal]

If an upgrade requires the compromising of water tight integrity of a vessel, such as removing under water torpedoes (something WW1 era BBs had) then I would expect that there would be "flotation" damage that would require drydocking to fix. However I think it is to be expected that most upgrades are above the waterline and extracting the ship from the "shipyard" status is more than realistic, it is expected. Bullwinkle, you mentioned NAVSEA etc. Did these organizational aspects of the navy exist at the time the game covers? My understanding is that the Naval Ship Systems Command was established in 1966 replacing the Navy's Bureau of Ships (BuShips)which was established in 1940. But I'm thinking you are using modern terms to describe WW2 organizations. Hal

[Bullwinkle58]

ORIGINAL: dr.hal

If an upgrade requires the compromising of water tight integrity of a vessel, such as removing under water torpedoes (something WW1 era BBs had) then I would expect that there would be "flotation" damage that would require drydocking to fix. However I think it is to be expected that most upgrades are above the waterline and extracting the ship from the "shipyard" status is more than realistic, it is expected. Bullwinkle, you mentioned NAVSEA etc. Did these organizational aspects of the navy exist at the time the game covers? My understanding is that the Naval Ship Systems Command was established in 1966 replacing the Navy's Bureau of Ships (BuShips)which was established in 1940. But I'm thinking you are using modern terms to describe WW2 organizations. Hal

Yep, BuShips in WWII. I think there was a BuOrd too. And a BuMed and a BuPers and others. The BUs were mostly in the Main Navy building in D.C. on the Mall. My dad took me there when he was up on Navy business in the 1960s. They were falling apart and mostly had been vacated out to Crystal City with new names.

Some organizational structures in the USN were born during WWII and survive. The type commander structure (SurfLant/Pc, SubLant/Pac, AirLant/Pac) on the non-operations side of the house for example. Most people who watch movies think fleet structures do everything, but in reality they do very little. Most of the Navy is on the non-ops side of the house. Building, fixing, arming, training, recruiting.

An alteration to a class would have come out of D.C. from the Bureau structure. It wouldn't be decided by the CO, or locally by a yard CO, or even by someone like Nimitz or his staff. Too much real naval architecture work by the slipstick boys needed.

[sanderz]

A couple more questions....

What about the troops that assult Hong Kong that start in China? I have left them in China but they belong to the Southern Army and haven't paid any PPs.

What if i pay PPs but transfer the unit to say the Southern command as opposed to the China command - so technically i have paid the PPs but can then transfer anywhere after that for free.


As a more general point and relating to play balance - in the original game design where it was decided what the daily PP would be, what sort of assumptions were made about use of PP i.e. are things getting out of balance with the way the game is evolving?

Is this part of the game (HQ's/PPs) ever likely to be patched so resolve these issues?