A Question

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
tegeland
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:33 am

A Question

Post by tegeland »

Bought game +/- 2 weeks ago. Jumped into full campaign out of box.. couple days later decided to read the instructions..was a bit frustrating as you can imagine trying to play off intuition alone... so now I have read the manual cover to cover a couple times, been through every page of the forums, not necessarilly every post in every thread.. but....

The question...

if altitude is so important to fly cap/escort.. same altitude for cap/escort and bomber...and everyone seems to agree that cap levels set min/max 30/60 then.. why when i finish a coral sea and look at ai bases are the altitudes for cap and bomber never the same.. yet always it has exceptional cap coverage and.... cap levels set at 90-100 and fatigue way lower than me and cap numbers like 33... how do i make precise numbers like 33...... (16*.3=4.8=4(16*.33=5.28=5(16*.4=6.4=6(where is my 5?))))and... how do I consistently get 15 to 25 cap or escort in almost every air engagement (ai manages to rather consistently although oddly i do see a higher #of 12 than any other number but have not written this down to compare yet)..

ok.. it is more than one question but .. I have played a lot of coral seas back to back..50 or more..and all I focus on is air mechanics .. trying to make it do want and find a way to gain the kind of air superiority ai can achieve(it will decimate planes and crater moresby unusable if not kept in check) but to no end.. not to mention that when I do get 25 devastators at 5k' unscathed with escort remaining in the day they drop 1.. (one) 1 and only 1 1k bomb and it misses the entire airbase ..... hmmm ... 8 of its bombers can land up to 13 hits including base runway supplies and parked planes......

am i missing something obvious?

thanks for bothering to read this..more thanks if you know where i am going wrong..aside from playing a numbers game or considering this one floor up on arsenal of democracy
Ddog
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:37 am
Location: Cincinnati, OH

RE: A Question

Post by Ddog »

You should switch to PBEM [;)]  That's where the fun is.  Welcome to the game!
I'd rather be lucky than good.

User avatar
Barb
Posts: 2503
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:17 am
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

RE: A Question

Post by Barb »

Hi, welcome aboard first :)

Percentages
- adjustments are allowed by 10s only, but scenario builders had probably given percentages as 33 or 25 into editor. Once you put your unit in border values (0%/100% flying) you cannot set it up again in fractions, but just 10s. AI probably do not try to reset these percentages.

Fatigue
- should be accumulating if high percentages of planes/pilots fly as well as with range they fly and altitude settings (below 6000ft e.g.)

Hit probabilities - bomb release altitude, weather, enemy interception, flak, detection level of target, unit leader skill (land), individual pilot skill (ground bombing), plane load (no. of bombs), pilot fatigue, rolls - these all are factored to hit probability in one or other way.
Image
mike scholl 1
Posts: 1265
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:20 pm

RE: A Question

Post by mike scholl 1 »

ORIGINAL: Ddog
You should switch to PBEM [;)]  That's where the fun is.  Welcome to the game!


Let him get a firm grasp on the game's mechanics before you try to set him up as a "victim". [:D] But then you're right..., the AI is but a pale shadow compared to a human opponant.
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: A Question

Post by Lokasenna »

I think the AI gets a little "help" coordinating things like CAP and altitude, and fatigue, even on normal difficulty. Can't prove this, however.

Also, welcome! I did the same thing (jump right into a grand campaign :P) about a year ago, it's been great fun.
User avatar
DivePac88
Posts: 3119
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Somewhere in the South Pacific.

RE: A Question

Post by DivePac88 »

Welcome to the world of WitP tegeland, and don't beat you're self-up too much. You are learning to play a very complex game, and every turn you run you will learn something new. I installed AE on the week it was released, and have been playing and editing it all these years, and I'm still learning stuff. I think of this game as layered, and when you learn one layer, you find another one underneath. Just keep at it, maybe start with one of the smaller scenarios (like I did) against the AI.
Image
When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way
User avatar
RogerJNeilson
Posts: 1277
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:21 am
Location: Bedlington, Northumberland, UK

RE: A Question

Post by RogerJNeilson »

Like DivePac I installed this game the day it was released, having come from its predecessor. I should therefore know all there is to know about it.... I play it every day and have three active PBEMs on the go....

Every turn I go 'hey, that's a new one for me to learn'.

One of the reasons why there is no other game like it and why in playtime this has been the cheapest piece of software i have ever bought.

Roger

An unplanned dynasty: Roger Neilson, Roger Neilson 11, Roger Neilson 3 previous posts 898+1515 + 1126 = 3539.....Finally completed my game which started the day WITP:AE was released
User avatar
tocaff
Posts: 4765
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:30 pm
Location: USA now in Brasil

RE: A Question

Post by tocaff »

Welcome aboard. The learning cliff never ends, but life as you knew it does.
Todd

I never thought that doing an AAR would be so time consuming and difficult.
www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2080768
User avatar
ilovestrategy
Posts: 3614
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:41 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

RE: A Question

Post by ilovestrategy »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna



Also, welcome! I did the same thing (jump right into a grand campaign :P) about a year ago, it's been great fun.


So it's ok if I do this? So far I've been piddling around in the Coral Sea for the last week or so trying to get a grasp on the game.

While i'm here, I'll ask, were you reading the manual while playing?
After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!
Image
User avatar
ilovestrategy
Posts: 3614
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:41 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

RE: A Question

Post by ilovestrategy »

Some how I double posted. Sorry!
After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!
Image
User avatar
RogerJNeilson
Posts: 1277
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:21 am
Location: Bedlington, Northumberland, UK

RE: A Question

Post by RogerJNeilson »

I haven't 'read' the manual yet.... I do very occasionally look up something. Most of my learning comes from my kind opponents who keep teaching me lessons!

And I have not yet touched a little scenario..... to me that's like going to some foreign country and eating your own food..... its the full experience or nothing.

Roger
An unplanned dynasty: Roger Neilson, Roger Neilson 11, Roger Neilson 3 previous posts 898+1515 + 1126 = 3539.....Finally completed my game which started the day WITP:AE was released
User avatar
DivePac88
Posts: 3119
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Somewhere in the South Pacific.

RE: A Question

Post by DivePac88 »

ORIGINAL: ilovestrategy

Some how I double posted. Sorry!

I haven't come across this one yet, so I'll check the Manual. [:D]
Image
When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way
User avatar
ilovestrategy
Posts: 3614
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:41 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

RE: A Question

Post by ilovestrategy »

ORIGINAL: DivePac88

ORIGINAL: ilovestrategy

Some how I double posted. Sorry!

I haven't come across this one yet, so I'll check the Manual. [:D]


Page 345, paragraph 4, subsection 562.4582 [:D]
After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!
Image
User avatar
ilovestrategy
Posts: 3614
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:41 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

RE: A Question

Post by ilovestrategy »

ORIGINAL: Roger Neilson 3

I haven't 'read' the manual yet.... I do very occasionally look up something. Most of my learning comes from my kind opponents who keep teaching me lessons!

And I have not yet touched a little scenario..... to me that's like going to some foreign country and eating your own food..... its the full experience or nothing.

Roger


I'm following your way. It's December 9th and the Nips are still there. I moved the Enterprise near the French Shoals and the Lexington is enroute.

I still have no clue what I'm doing but already I'm constantly thinking about this game.......
After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!
Image
Chris21wen
Posts: 7861
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Cottesmore, Rutland

RE: A Question

Post by Chris21wen »

ORIGINAL: Roger Neilson 3

Like DivePac I installed this game the day it was released, having come from its predecessor. I should therefore know all there is to know about it.... I play it every day and have three active PBEMs on the go....

Every turn I go 'hey, that's a new one for me to learn'.

One of the reasons why there is no other game like it and why in playtime this has been the cheapest piece of software i have ever bought.

Roger


Me too
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: A Question

Post by Lokasenna »

I learn most quickly by doing, so I just started playing and used the manual as a reference. Having two monitors is key... Manual open on one, WITP in window mode on the other. I barely open the manual now against AI (it's been months), but I bet if I were in a PBEM I'd have it open all the time again...
Oldguard1970
Posts: 578
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:49 pm
Location: Hiawassee, GA

RE: A Question

Post by Oldguard1970 »

I concur with the positive commetns about this game. It is complex, compelling, demanding, frustrating, and grand fun!

When I first bought the game, I "read" the manual and opened a scenario. I sat frozen at my computer without a clue about how to get started. Finally, I just tried to focus on using air power by making a few air moves and then letting the AI run its turn. After a few turns, I restarted and played with air units and with ships. A few turns later I restarted and began to use all units. The AI had a field day with me and handed me defeat after defeat for weeks. Each time, I learned more.

Finally, I got to the point where I had to be kind to the AI just to keep the gaime alive.

So... I challenged my friend to PBEM, and life changed. The tension is excruciating! What will he do? Will my "trap" work, or will it backfire? How should I shape my long term plans? Have I committed enough? Have I committed too much? Where am I exposed? Does he know? Where is he weak? Can I use his weakness, or is that a trap of his own?

I am always learning new aspects of the mechanics. My opponent and I share our insights. (We enjoy the contest and want to play against the other commander without a special advantage in mechanical knowledge. We know a perfectly level knowledge of the game is not possible, but we are happy to work to level things out when we sense disparity.)

The game demands a special degree of self-discipline in order to deal with the pesky aspects of secondary life, such as job, family, etc. I resolve those matters as quickly as I can to leave more time to deal with my next move.

Welcome!
"Rangers Lead the Way!"
User avatar
littleike
Posts: 200
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:25 am

RE: A Question

Post by littleike »

ORIGINAL: OldGuard1970

I concur with the positive commetns about this game. It is complex, compelling, demanding, frustrating, and grand fun!


I would add also the word "rewarding" to describe this sim.

The more time you expend with it, the more you get. [:)]

Three jet pilot useless things: Sky above you, airstrip behind you and half second ago.
User avatar
ilovestrategy
Posts: 3614
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:41 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

RE: A Question

Post by ilovestrategy »

ORIGINAL: OldGuard1970

I concur with the positive commetns about this game. It is complex, compelling, demanding, frustrating, and grand fun!

When I first bought the game, I "read" the manual and opened a scenario. I sat frozen at my computer without a clue about how to get started. Finally, I just tried to focus on using air power by making a few air moves and then letting the AI run its turn. After a few turns, I restarted and played with air units and with ships. A few turns later I restarted and began to use all units. The AI had a field day with me and handed me defeat after defeat for weeks. Each time, I learned more.


Ok, that makes me feel better. I'm learning step by step. For example, today I figured out in the Grand Campaign how to find the Lexington. The "all Ships" and "all task forces" buttons on the top threw me for a loop. Now i'm working on repairing ships in port.

I never knew pilots get fatigued lol.
After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!
Image
User avatar
Lecivius
Posts: 4845
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:53 am
Location: Denver

RE: A Question

Post by Lecivius »

Dang, wrong thread [:(]
If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”