Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design, art and sound modding and the game editor for WITP Admiral's Edition.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

Just a note to say I am working on this right now. I might even have something ready for play-testing in the New Year.

I will play the Evil Empire, so I need a volunteer to be the good guys for about a month of game time.
Mac Linehan
Posts: 1518
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 9:08 pm
Location: Denver Colorado

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Mac Linehan »

Captain Cruft -

Am very pleased that you are still hard at it, cause it will be worth while.

Merry Christmas to you, Sir!

Mac
LAV-25 2147
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

Well I did a lot of donkey work over Christmas/New Year. That's good, but now I am into the fun but very time consuming part of putting the airgroups and LCUs on the map. This will take a while.

Technology transfer - This is a generic Japanese version of the FW-190. Obviously I need to change the graphics, but I think it ought to be a very useful addition to the IJAAF arsenal. I have added this but removed the Tony (all variants) to compensate. Credit to Dali and WitW for the stats and graphics.

Image
Attachments
ki64.jpg
ki64.jpg (135.23 KiB) Viewed 660 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

Snowed off work today, which gives an opportunity to progress this thing.

The 3 Yamatos are all available at game start, and have been completed as "invinci-carriers" with slightly heavier 1,000lb bomb-proof deck armour and a 1945-equivalent AA complement.

Image
Attachments
musahi.jpg
musahi.jpg (155.74 KiB) Viewed 658 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

Apart from the Ki-64 (FW-190) the only other plane I have added is a jet-powered Shinden.

Image
Attachments
shinden.jpg
shinden.jpg (94.37 KiB) Viewed 654 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

The Ki-74 Patsy is now much more useful as it can carry a whole ton of bombs out to 30 hexes, and transfer across the map in a single turn.

Image
Attachments
patsy.jpg
patsy.jpg (97.8 KiB) Viewed 654 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

The Ki-95 is now a genuine long-range recon plane. In the default data it's actually worse than the Ki-46 III Dinah so there was no point in building it.

Image
Attachments
ki95.jpg
ki95.jpg (91.15 KiB) Viewed 655 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

I have also ubered-up the Ki-83 a bit, particularly in the range department.

Image
Attachments
ki83.jpg
ki83.jpg (97.61 KiB) Viewed 654 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

The Frank has been developed as much more of a pure interceptor. We have Ki-64s to drop bombs and fight at low altitude ...

Image
Attachments
frank.jpg
frank.jpg (115.25 KiB) Viewed 655 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

Japanese planes which I have removed:-

All the kami variants with the 800kg bomb. These are very open to abuse, and I don't really believe in compulsory kamikaze missions anyway. Let individual pilots decide whether they want to die for the Emperor.

The ugly George.

The Tony.

The Ki-201.

The Me-163 equivalents.
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

Tentative starting dispositions at Guam. The fighters are all early Corsairs and the dive bombers are all SBD-5s.

I have done some limited testing, and while Japan can suppress the airfield (at a cost), actually invading the place might be quite tricky.

Image
Attachments
guamdisp.jpg
guamdisp.jpg (316.09 KiB) Viewed 654 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

One thing I really wanted to incorporate into this scenario was the use of captured equipment. So far I have succeeded with fortress units, an example of which is below. This is a reduced version of the original Soviet unit, there will be no replacements for any of the devices and as you can see the unit lacks Support. So you have to stack Japanese units with it to get best results.

All the Soviet and British fortresses (Hong Kong, Singapore and Georgetown) get the same treatment.

I also intend to include some Japanese airgroups which use Soviet planes, again with no replacements, and some ships too. Plus of course some "Hiwi" analog militia type LCUs.

As a sort of corollary, the Aussies get to use some British stuff (ships) which while not exactly being captured just happened to be in the vicinity when the British Empire collapsed.

Image
Attachments
vladifort.jpg
vladifort.jpg (303.02 KiB) Viewed 654 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

For the Allies, the goal is to get to here ...

Image
Attachments
siberia.jpg
siberia.jpg (885.29 KiB) Viewed 654 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

So, as the Allies you are going to need a large port attached to the Trans-Siberian railroad. Which is it to be?

Vladivostok, Kanko, Fusan, Port Arthur, Tientsin, Tsingtao or Shanghai are the choices [8D]

Image
Attachments
siberiaports.jpg
siberiaports.jpg (615.5 KiB) Viewed 654 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

Just fooling around with the FW-190 derivatives ...

In the picture below some FW-190 G8 equivalents (the Ki-65-1b "Kurt") escort torpedo carrying Peggies on a naval strike against a USN Air Combat TF forming up at Manila.

The basic idea is that both the IJN and IJA adopt long-range FW-190 derivatives as their "high-tech" fighter, while retaining the low-tech Oscars, Tojos and Zeroes in a complementary role. This is the basic radial engined FW-190 A/F/G, not the Dora or Ta-152. I can't see any real reason why Japan could not have done this in reality. The planes will all have a service rating of 2, and will be land-based only.

As a corollary, I think that I will likely remove the Jack, George, Sam, Shinden and Frank completely. The Ki-83 will be there though. I think I already said that no jet or rocket powered aircraft will feature for Japan.

To balance this potentially game changing aircraft, Allied airgroups will generally arrive much earlier so as to have numerical superiority from the start.

Image
Attachments
kurttakao.jpg
kurttakao.jpg (335.34 KiB) Viewed 654 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

The IJA favours an ordnance delivery capacity and is prepared to sacrifice some air fighting capability to achieve it.

Image
Attachments
ki651b.jpg
ki651b.jpg (105 KiB) Viewed 654 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

Whereas the IJN prefers a pure fighter.

Image
Attachments
j3m2.jpg
j3m2.jpg (106.13 KiB) Viewed 657 times
Saros
Posts: 454
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 6:18 am

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Saros »

Those Fw-190's are going to beat the snot out of everything US until the P-47/P-50/Corsair are available in numbers.
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by Captain Cruft »

Those two later variants are not available at game start. The earlier ones are less uber and there will be very few of them on the map at the beginning. Production will have to be ramped up pretty much from nothing.

Also consider that, Ki-83 excepted, these are the best fighters that Japan will be flying in 1946.
User avatar
traskott
Posts: 1577
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:30 am
Location: Valladolid, Spain

RE: Axis Aflame: America Stands Alone

Post by traskott »

I've tested Fw-190s and the more gamebreaker are their 4 20mm cannons. They kill 2E and 1E bombers by droves.
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design and Modding”