US BCVs?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
DOCUP
Posts: 3118
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:38 pm

US BCVs?

Post by DOCUP »

I have seen several websites that mentioned the US had atleast talked about BCVs. Is this true? Some of them even mentioned them before WW2 started. I know the ones the Japanese converted to were a flop. But what were the ones the US thought about? Some one educate me.[:D]
User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7687
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: US BCVs?

Post by wdolson »

Are you talking about battleship conversions? The only one I know of was converting the Iowa class. While under construction there was pressure to complete the Iowas as something similar to an Essex class carrier. Ernest King vetoed the idea.

Later in 1960s there were some other ideas kicked around to convert the Iowas to hybrid carriers. I believe one idea was to rebuild them as helicopter carriers and I believe I saw an old model of a VTOL ramped version. It had a skateboard ramp like the RN carriers vintage Falklands War.

There was a proposal from the RN to build massive carriers out of a mix of wood pulp and ice called pykrete. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Habakkuk

There is a story the program died soon after a Roosevelt/Churchill conference where Lord Mountbatton demonstrated the strength of pykrete by shooting a block of it with his service revolver and the round ricocheted almost hitting Ernest King in the leg. Bad idea to go around shooting your allies admirals.

Bill
WIS Development Team
User avatar
DOCUP
Posts: 3118
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:38 pm

RE: US BCVs?

Post by DOCUP »

I will see if I can find the websites.  Thanks for your quick response Wdolson
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: US BCVs?

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

An aircraft carrier made of pulp and ice?
that is even weirder than the "bat bomb" experiment

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_bomb

User avatar
ilovestrategy
Posts: 3614
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:41 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

RE: US BCVs?

Post by ilovestrategy »

I played waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much Star Fleet Battles. A Fed battle carrier was the first thing that popped in my mind when I saw the thread title. [:D]
After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!
Image
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6417
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: US BCVs?

Post by JeffroK »

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

An aircraft carrier made of pulp and ice?
that is even weirder than the "bat bomb" experiment

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_bomb

Look it up under Pykrete or HMS Habbakuk.

Even mythbusters had a go and proved its possibility.

Things like the bat bomb or pigeon guided bomb were possible, The Russians had a Dog Anti Tank Mine.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
ilovestrategy
Posts: 3614
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:41 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

RE: US BCVs?

Post by ilovestrategy »

PETA would have a fit. [:D]
After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!
Image
spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: US BCVs?

Post by spence »

Perhaps you meant CVB vice BCV. My father was a naval aviator in WW2. He had a book called "Introduction to Naval Aviation" which was published just after WW2 which referred to the Midway Class carriers as CVBs.
User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: US BCVs?

Post by geofflambert »

I think BCV refers to a hybrid carrier/battleship with a rear carrier deck and battleship guns forward. They were thought about but a pretty stupid idea in my opinion.

Actually I think they were more hybrid CV/BC than CV/BB.

User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: US BCVs?

Post by geofflambert »


DavidTheGreat
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:27 am

RE: US BCVs?

Post by DavidTheGreat »

I loved SFB, to bad it has no decent online multiplayer platform.
User avatar
ilovestrategy
Posts: 3614
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:41 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

RE: US BCVs?

Post by ilovestrategy »

ORIGINAL: David The Great

I loved SFB, to bad it has no decent online multiplayer platform.


Never played the computer game. I just played the board version along with Federation and Empire.
After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!
Image
User avatar
AcePylut
Posts: 1487
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:01 am

RE: US BCVs?

Post by AcePylut »

ORIGINAL: David The Great

I loved SFB, to bad it has no decent online multiplayer platform.

Have you ever played StarFleet Command?

It's a game based on SFB that came out about 12 years ago. SFC1, SFC2, SFC2:OP. Avoid SFC3.
DavidTheGreat
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:27 am

RE: US BCVs?

Post by DavidTheGreat »

Yes I did, was a decent game, the first two being my favorite. It did have multiplayer for battles, the campaign was another story.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”