not getting any hits

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

towers58
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:49 pm

not getting any hits

Post by towers58 »

I am flying my P-38Gs (load of 3200 ibs.) on airfield attacks and I am not getting any hits. My pilots are experienced and skilled, the base being targeted is well-detected. The planes are flying, just not causing any damage. I have tried changing the altitude (any and all from 1,000 to 9,000.) Medium bombers are okay, as are the heavies, but FB's result in the goose egg.
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3739
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: not getting any hits

Post by Captain Cruft »

What's the range?
towers58
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:49 pm

RE: not getting any hits

Post by towers58 »

As close as 4 hexes and as far as 8 (flying with drop tanks).
pws1225
Posts: 1166
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:39 pm
Location: Tate's Hell, Florida

RE: not getting any hits

Post by pws1225 »

Could it be that the drop tanks are mounted where the bombs would normally go? If so, that could explain you've had no results from your 'bomb' runs.
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7444
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: not getting any hits

Post by Q-Ball »

My two cents, the P-38 is too valuable as a fighter, and too limited in numbers, to try to use as a bomber.
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: not getting any hits

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: towers58

I am flying my P-38Gs (load of 3200 ibs.) on airfield attacks and I am not getting any hits. My pilots are experienced and skilled, the base being targeted is well-detected. The planes are flying, just not causing any damage. I have tried changing the altitude (any and all from 1,000 to 9,000.) Medium bombers are okay, as are the heavies, but FB's result in the goose egg.

Screenshot of your pilots would be helpful. Also, screenshot of your squadron (with orders set as you would for airfield attacks) would be helpful too.
Image
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: not getting any hits

Post by HansBolter »

Don't pure fighter types (F) need to be at 100 ft. altitude (strafing) to make an attack on an airfield or a ship or a ground unit, regardless of whether or not they carry bombs?

It's my understanding that a fighter bomber type (FB) can bomb from varying altuitudes, but a fighter can only attack non air targets from an altitude of 100 ft.

Can anyone correct me, or do I have it right?
Hans

DaveConn
Posts: 254
Joined: Thu May 03, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Bainbridge Island, Washington

RE: not getting any hits

Post by DaveConn »

Pretty sure this is not correct; I am almost positive I have conducted ground attack missions with P-40Ks from several thousand feet.
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: not getting any hits

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

My two cents, the P-38 is too valuable as a fighter, and too limited in numbers, to try to use as a bomber.

+1

Stop using them as bombers! [X(]
Image
User avatar
Paladin1dcs
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 2:05 pm
Location: Charleston, WV

RE: not getting any hits

Post by Paladin1dcs »

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

My two cents, the P-38 is too valuable as a fighter, and too limited in numbers, to try to use as a bomber.

+1

Stop using them as bombers! [X(]

I've seen some JFBs complaining about Allied 4E bombers being more lethal than the Allied fighters, so why not use the fighters as bombers? [:D]
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: not getting any hits

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: DaveConn

Pretty sure this is not correct; I am almost positive I have conducted ground attack missions with P-40Ks from several thousand feet.


Are you sure they are bombing from the altitude you set or cruising to the target at that altitude and dropping to 100 feet to strafe when they reach the target just as torpedo bombers fly to the target at whatever altitude you set and then drop to torpedo delivery height when they reach the target?
Hans

DaveConn
Posts: 254
Joined: Thu May 03, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Bainbridge Island, Washington

RE: not getting any hits

Post by DaveConn »

ORIGINAL: DaveConn

Pretty sure this is not correct; I am almost positive I have conducted ground attack missions with P-40Ks from several thousand feet.




Are you sure they are bombing from the altitude you set or cruising to the target at that altitude and dropping to 100 feet to strafe when they reach the target just as torpedo bombers fly to the target at whatever altitude you set and then drop to torpedo delivery height when they reach the target?

The combat report showed them as bombing from higher altitude; see the example below.

Afternoon Air attack on Sasebo 5th SNLF, at 68,105 (Kolaka)

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid spotted at 18 NM, estimated altitude 6,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes


Allied aircraft
B-25C Mitchell x 13
Kittyhawk III x 11
B-25C Mitchell x 12
P-40K Warhawk x 22


Allied aircraft losses
B-25C Mitchell: 2 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
39 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled



Aircraft Attacking:
13 x B-25C Mitchell bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 6 x 500 lb GP Bomb
12 x B-25C Mitchell bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 6 x 500 lb GP Bomb
22 x P-40K Warhawk bombing from 10000 feet
Ground Attack: 1 x 500 lb GP Bomb


(Before anyone asks why on earth I am bombing with P-40s from 10K feet, I was trying to figure out whether the mission altitude affects the attack altitude for fighters; I think it does, but didn't try it enough to settle the issue.)
User avatar
Capt Hornblower
Posts: 246
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:09 pm
Location: Massachusetts, USA

RE: not getting any hits

Post by Capt Hornblower »

I don't know about the effects of a combined strike (as in DaveConn's case), but I've had some Hurricanes attacking Japanese ground units in Burma, and they transit at 6000', but the combat report has the attack coming at strafing height of 100'.
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: not getting any hits

Post by Alfred »

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

Don't pure fighter types (F) need to be at 100 ft. altitude (strafing) to make an attack on an airfield or a ship or a ground unit, regardless of whether or not they carry bombs?

It's my understanding that a fighter bomber type (FB) can bomb from varying altuitudes, but a fighter can only attack non air targets from an altitude of 100 ft.

Can anyone correct me, or do I have it right?

Not quite. You are confusing the mechanics of attacking barges and PT boats. Fighter bombers will attack these ships irrespective of their assigned altitude. Whereas fighters will only attack them if assigned to 100'.

Alfred
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12670
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: not getting any hits

Post by Sardaukar »

Do not select "Use drop tanks". That will prevent them using bombs.

Pretty logical, I think.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: not getting any hits

Post by Alfred »

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

Do not select "Use drop tanks". That will prevent them using bombs.

Pretty logical, I think.

Further to Sardaukar's point, read michaelm's posts in this thread.

tm.asp?m=3202687&mpage=1&key=centerline ... n&#3203458

Alfred
towers58
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:49 pm

RE: not getting any hits

Post by towers58 »

I was thinking the same way as Moose - by adding the drop tanks I thought I was able to burn extra supply to get the longer range and still carry ordinance. Sardaukar's comment makes sense now, though.

For those complaining about the use of the P-38 in a ground attack role - I seem to be very short-handed in terms of 2E bombers and the Lightning carries almost the same bomb load.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: not getting any hits

Post by witpqs »

All you have to do is look at the aircraft display WHEN you have drop tanks selected and it shows what weapons it carries with the drop tanks. Some aircraft do still carry torpedoes, large bombs, etc. when also fitted with drop tanks, but other aircraft don't.

If you look at the display when you have selected no drop tanks then you see the weapons the plane carries when drop tanks are not fitted.
Cpt Sherwood
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:27 am
Location: A Very Nice Place in the USA

RE: not getting any hits

Post by Cpt Sherwood »

I learned that when my Wildebeasts would not do a Naval Attack on a TF one hex away. I had left drop tanks selected.
“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: not getting any hits

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: Cpt Sherwood

I learned that when my Wildebeasts would not do a Naval Attack on a TF one hex away. I had left drop tanks selected.

And I thought it was just me. [8D]
The Moose
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”