ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
My plan is to be able to start training IJAAF pilots in navT role by the end of 1943 and to produce 180 Peggy-T each month by mid 1944.
This bomber is fast, armoured, durable (for Japanese standars) and can completely substitute the P1Y series in anti-naval role
But GreyJoy, if you only get the Peggy (T) on or around 1/44, why is that any better than using your (trained) IJAAF pilots as kamikazes? That's how I intend to use my supernumerary IJAAF pilot pools moving forward. Plus, then you don't have to worry about an air HQ with sufficient torps and you can use any number of different superfluous airframes.
I'm training up kamikaze pilots in number from day 1 of the war. Then I'll be able to use my old Sallys, Helen, and other (by then) antiquated airframes.
Mmmm... I don't fully agree here, sorry mate. By jan 1944 kamikaze aren't activated, afaik, automatically but only if the allies recapture a base within 21 hexes from saigon, tokyo or Takao.
Even a landing at saipan won't trigger the kamis.... So, exept you think your opponent can land anywhere within the above mentioned range, it's a mistake, imho, not to invest on the KI-67-T and on the naval-t training program for the IJAAF pilots.
Moreover, i do train lots of IJAAF in lownaval since the beginning, but i do plan to be able to use them way later than the arrival of the KI-67-T.
Kamikaze are surely a good and important weapon, as you have highlighted, but they cannot, imho, substitute the power of the torpedo armed aircrafts; both from a timing prospective and from an effectiveness one





