I managed to misplace some very on-point emails from Toidi, I hope he still has them and adds the content to this AAR.
Admiral Canaris,
The purpose of this document is to document the various intelligence failures and unexplained phenomena leading to the recently concluded disaster in Russia. The campaign started well with complete strategic surprise and many Soviet units surrounded with hundreds of thousands of prisoners.
After the initial reverses along the border, however, the enemy retreated in good order and we were unable to encircle any significant forces. One of the key reasons for this is the remarkably resilient command and control demonstrated at all echelons of Soviet leadership. Indeed, the Soviet ability to respond to our attacks exceeded anything we experienced in the West. Within weeks of the initial assault, the enemy was organizing large scale counterattacks against our lead mobile elements. They frequently surrounded and routed them. Soviet logistics appeared to generally operate very well. The expected shortages and bottlenecks we anticipated as a result of the lack of experienced staff officers and organization of new headquarters did not appear. While the enemy made adjustments to accommodate for the lack of experienced senior officers, the overall Soviet command and control from late July through the end appeared to operate as well as ours. Indeed, in the logistics area, the enemy capabilities appeared to significantly exceed our own – even in stable areas of the front directly serviced by nearby rail lines. This is the status of the front in early October.








