VP trends, pre- and post-Singers' fall.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition



ORIGINAL: erstad
I think entrusting an operation to Snagglepuss is risky, given the AE map. I can just see Admiral Snagglepuss issuing the order "Exit, stage west!" and having half the TFs heading in a true West direction and the other half heading West as the AE map represents it.


ORIGINAL: JocMeister
Ouch, a shame on the lost TF. Very risky move on his part though. From what I can tell Jap CAs are precious as gold! Can´t defend everything against these kind of raids anyway. I usually throw in something with ASW value but thats about it.
2) Another naval oddity. Dutch sub in mid-South China Sea attacks past many escorts and sinks lone xAK. A lot of escorts for one xAK. Was it carrying a high-value unit? Maybe an HQ? Or a bomber squadron? Course was generally for Singers or north Borneo.
Sub attack near Jesselton at 66,82
Japanese Ships
xAK Syohei Maru, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
SC CHa-12
SC Ch 23
SC Ch 8
SC CHa-30
SC CHa-25
SC CHa-24
SC CHa-23
Allied Ships
SS KXIV
ORIGINAL: Quixote
2) Another naval oddity. Dutch sub in mid-South China Sea attacks past many escorts and sinks lone xAK. A lot of escorts for one xAK. Was it carrying a high-value unit? Maybe an HQ? Or a bomber squadron? Course was generally for Singers or north Borneo.
Sub attack near Jesselton at 66,82
Japanese Ships
xAK Syohei Maru, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
SC CHa-12
SC Ch 23
SC Ch 8
SC CHa-30
SC CHa-25
SC CHa-24
SC CHa-23
Allied Ships
SS KXIV
Could be a single ship, but it could also be part of a bigger TF but you're only seeing some of the ships involved. Since I like to sandbox things, I've played many turns of PBEM against myself (to get a better feel for what things look like from just one side, instead of playing on the head to head setting, which will show you different results during the replay) and there have been numerous occasions when a sub would attack an enemy TF and I wouldn't see all of the ships in that TF, despite knowing they were there. I assume (dangerously perhaps) that in PBEM you may only see the ships actually involved in any given sub action instead of automatically seeing every ship that was present.
He knows I have at least some TBs at Colombo. (They didn't fly of course.)
SCs do not have good fuel range. If he is transferring a bunch of them to one of your sub hot-spots, he may have sent along the xAK just to transfer fuel during the trip
ORIGINAL: Quixote
Could be a single ship, but it could also be part of a bigger TF but you're only seeing some of the ships involved. Since I like to sandbox things, I've played many turns of PBEM against myself (to get a better feel for what things look like from just one side, instead of playing on the head to head setting, which will show you different results during the replay) and there have been numerous occasions when a sub would attack an enemy TF and I wouldn't see all of the ships in that TF, despite knowing they were there. I assume (dangerously perhaps) that in PBEM you may only see the ships actually involved in any given sub action instead of automatically seeing every ship that was present.
ORIGINAL: erstad
He knows I have at least some TBs at Colombo. (They didn't fly of course.)
Just to check, these weren't Vildebeests at extended range, were they?
[/center]
