Top Ten fighting ships of all time

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

kjnoel
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:43 am

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by kjnoel »

geofflambert


quote:

ORIGINAL: CV60
6) HMS Victory-In service from 1765 through (I believe) approx. 1820.



Does everyone realise that when the Brits decided to build a ship of the line, they first planted the trees they would be made from. These trees were grown in forests in the possession of the king, hence the name "Royal Oak" for one of them. I suppose you should add to their longevity the time from when the trees were planted and the ship was commissioned. Un effing believable.


Victory is actually still a commissioned ship in the Royal Navy and is the flagship of some Admiral or other.... Of course, she's of limited combat value nowadays [:D] but that's a lot of time to be commissioned! 260 years and counting.

I was on her at the weekend, a beautiful ship; slightly lacking at the moment as they have removed the topmasts for renovation.
User avatar
LargeSlowTarget
Posts: 4957
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hessen, Germany - now living in France

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by LargeSlowTarget »

How did Big E (CV-6)? She has in the midst of every major battle from start almost to finish except at Coral Sea. If there ever was a fighting ship, it was her.
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by Canoerebel »

A squirrel can still travel from New England (actually from Quebec) to Mississippi (and probably on to eastern Texas) without touching the ground. The eastern US is more forested today than it was 100 or 150 years ago.

You're right about Brittain relying on the Colonies for timber, especially for shipping. This included the white pine in New England and the live oak of Georgia and Florida and vicinity.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
CV60
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:40 pm

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by CV60 »

How did Big E (CV-6)? She has in the midst of every major battle from start almost to finish except at Coral Sea. If there ever was a fighting ship, it was her.

In terms of individual ships, The ENTERPRISE (CV-6) would definitely be in the top ten. However, I was defining it more as a class of ships, and used longevity and combat effectiveness over the course of their career. Although I didn't state it, I also gave "bonus points" for remaining relevant through a revolutionary period of naval development. Hence, the ESSEX class, which remained relevant during the piston-jet transition, or the QUEEN ELIZABETH class that remained relevant during the Battleship-Carrier transition.
“Do I not destroy my enemies when I make them my friends?” -Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
catwhoorg
Posts: 686
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 3:47 pm
Location: Uk expat lving near Atlanta

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by catwhoorg »

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

The best warship of all time:
The Hellenistic Quinquereme



I was thinking Athenian Trireme woudl be worthy of inclusion.
Fast, maneuverable, and well crewed.

"All time" for most shows really means the last 50-60 years
Image
User avatar
CV60
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:40 pm

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by CV60 »

ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget

How did Big E (CV-6)? She has in the midst of every major battle from start almost to finish except at Coral Sea. If there ever was a fighting ship, it was her.


In terms of individual ships, The ENTERPRISE (CV-6) would definitely be in the top ten. However, I was defining it more as a class of ships, and used longevity and combat effectiveness over the course of their career. Although I didn't state it, I also gave "bonus points" for remaining relevant through a revolutionary period of naval development. Hence, the ESSEX class, which remained relevant during the piston-jet transition, or the QUEEN ELIZABETH class that remained relevant during the Battleship-Carrier transition.

Tom's comment about the GATO class SS and the USS MONITOR are valid. However, using the definition I was using, I'm not sure they would make the list. USS MONITOR was certainly a revolutionary ship, but it and the Monitor design only had a limited period of combat effectiveness, although the ideas tried out in the Monitor were (and still are) used in every major warship design since. The GATO/Balo/TRENCH class were outstanding designs (and I believe one or two of these vessels are still in use for training boats in Taiwan. However, I'm not sure they had the combat effectiveness throughout their career as some of the other vessels named. However, they certainly would merit further discussion for inclusion on the "top 10" list.

Catwhoorg-You are right about the Trieme-as a class of ship, it had a long combat service life-It should be on the list.
“Do I not destroy my enemies when I make them my friends?” -Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7687
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by wdolson »

The Enterprise was definitely a notable ship. She had more battle stars than any US ship in history (I believe the San Francisco was 2nd). However the Yorktown class was not all that spectacular. 2/3 of the class was lost and the Hornet barely lasted a year from commissioning to sinking.

The Yorktown class was the first keel up successful carrier design in the USN. Lessons learned with the Yorktowns directly affected the Essex class design.

Bill
WIS Development Team
User avatar
decaro
Posts: 4004
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:05 pm
Location: Stratford, Connecticut
Contact:

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by decaro »

ORIGINAL: wdolson

For usefulness over the life of the ship I would put the Essex class carriers as 1st. ...Iowas were obsolete the day they were commissioned. They were useful for some support roles at various times ...

... like the time the Missouri was in a "supporting" role for Segal's "Under Seige".

BTW, "length of service" was a factor and Essex Class CVs made the list, but as their non-nuclear fuel wasn't unlimited, Nimitz Class beat them out.
Stratford, Connecticut, U.S.A.[center]Image[/center]
[center]"The Angel of Okinawa"[/center]
Home of the Chance-Vought Corsair, F4U
The best fighter-bomber of World War II
User avatar
decaro
Posts: 4004
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:05 pm
Location: Stratford, Connecticut
Contact:

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by decaro »

ORIGINAL: CV60

I'm a sucker for lists like this, so I'll give a shot at creating my own list ... 3) Queen Elizabeth BB-In service from Jutland to end of WWII. Effective in 2 World Wars ...

I recall that we have the Warspite in AE, but it can barely hold it's own against IJN CA's.

Oddly enough, I don't recall that any IJN ship made the Top Ten list, but coincidently, the QE Class also made the #3 slot.
Stratford, Connecticut, U.S.A.[center]Image[/center]
[center]"The Angel of Okinawa"[/center]
Home of the Chance-Vought Corsair, F4U
The best fighter-bomber of World War II
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: catwhoorg

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

The best warship of all time:
The Hellenistic Quinquereme



I was thinking Athenian Trireme woudl be worthy of inclusion.
Fast, maneuverable, and well crewed.

"All time" for most shows really means the last 50-60 years

Some posters with a lot more historic knowledge than the "Military Channel" (Iowa class? Seriously?) beat me to the punch overnight, but I'll give my list.

1. The Athenian Alliance triremes at the Battle of Salamis. Arguably the most decisive naval battle in world history, certainly for the West. If Persia had won and defeated the Greek city states, Greek learning would have been subsumed into Persian culture. Greek learning in math, science, archetucture, and philosophy would not have been available to Rome when it took Greece as a province in the 2nd C. BC, to be taken up by them, preserved, and expanded into vast civil engineering projects. That learning would not have been available to the early Church, which took it from a falling Rome and preserved it for a thousand years until the Renaissance.

More locally, a Persian victory in the second Persian War probably prevents Alexander from happening, and thus the Hellenization of Asia Minor and the Near East does not happen. Arguably, the entire Muslim expansion in the 7th and 8th centuries is severely changed by that series of events.

Salamis rules. In all of recorded history possibly the Most Important Day.

2. The galleys and galleasses of the Holy League at the Battle of Lepanto, in 1571. Muslim expansion into Europe was stopped in the east just as it had been stopped in the west by Charles Martel at the Battle of Tours in 732. Following Lepanto the Ottoman Empire reestablished naval dominance in the eastern Med and consolidated Muslim rule in North Africa, but it never again threatened Europe proper.

3. The English galleons and caravels against the Spanish Armada. Stopping the Armada cold through superior tactics and leadership while vastly outnumbered, the English victory secured England time to complete the Protestant conversion, opened up a new avenue for struggle in the New World, and set back Spanish designs on northern Europe by decades. Had the Armada prevailed and opened England to invasion the entire history of both Europe and North and South America would have been radically altered.

If any of these three battles had gone the other way most forumites would be speaking a different language. For that matter there is almost no chance WWII would have occurred, so, no AE, and no forum. Quite possibly no Internet either.

4. For this spot I would pick one not mentioned yet. The Monitor and her sisters, both single- and double-turreted. Instrumental in the blockade of the South, they were the single biggest reason European aid did not come to the CSA and allowed the Union to dissect the CSA from both the inside and outside. If the US Civil War had gone another way the whole course of European history in the 20th C. would have been different.

5. The Gato-class fleet submarine. (Surprise!) No single class of ship in WWII was more decisive on a strategic scale. These boats, with their follow-on classes, changed the course of WWII. Far more importnat in the ultimate defeat of Japan than any other platform, including the Essex-class.

For the next five slots, in no order I would include the Essexes. Also the standard RN 74-gun ship-of-the-line of the Napoleonic era, the USS Nautilus, the war junks of the Ming Dynasty, and the HMS Dreadnought.
The Moose
User avatar
Sieppo
Posts: 933
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:37 am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by Sieppo »

Nice history-lesson Moose :)!! Thanks.
> What is the hardest thing in the universe?
> A diamond?
> No. 500 machine gun men on a mountain.
User avatar
CV60
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:40 pm

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by CV60 »

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
ORIGINAL: catwhoorg

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

The best warship of all time:
The Hellenistic Quinquereme




I was thinking Athenian Trireme woudl be worthy of inclusion.
Fast, maneuverable, and well crewed.

"All time" for most shows really means the last 50-60 years

Some posters with a lot more historic knowledge than the "Military Channel" (Iowa class? Seriously?) beat me to the punch overnight, but I'll give my list.

1. The Athenian Alliance triremes at the Battle of Salamis. Arguably the most decisive naval battle in world history, certainly for the West. If Persia had won and defeated the Greek city states, Greek learning would have been subsumed into Persian culture. Greek learning in math, science, archetucture, and philosophy would not have been available to Rome when it took Greece as a province in the 2nd C. BC, to be taken up by them, preserved, and expanded into vast civil engineering projects. That learning would not have been available to the early Church, which took it from a falling Rome and preserved it for a thousand years until the Renaissance.

More locally, a Persian victory in the second Persian War probably prevents Alexander from happening, and thus the Hellenization of Asia Minor and the Near East does not happen. Arguably, the entire Muslim expansion in the 7th and 8th centuries is severely changed by that series of events.

Salamis rules. In all of recorded history possibly the Most Important Day.

2. The galleys and galleasses of the Holy League at the Battle of Lepanto, in 1571. Muslim expansion into Europe was stopped in the east just as it had been stopped in the west by Charles Martel at the Battle of Tours in 732. Following Lepanto the Ottoman Empire reestablished naval dominance in the eastern Med and consolidated Muslim rule in North Africa, but it never again threatened Europe proper.

3. The English galleons and caravels against the Spanish Armada. Stopping the Armada cold through superior tactics and leadership while vastly outnumbered, the English victory secured England time to complete the Protestant conversion, opened up a new avenue for struggle in the New World, and set back Spanish designs on northern Europe by decades. Had the Armada prevailed and opened England to invasion the entire history of both Europe and North and South America would have been radically altered.

If any of these three battles had gone the other way most forumites would be speaking a different language. For that matter there is almost no chance WWII would have occurred, so, no AE, and no forum. Quite possibly no Internet either.

4. For this spot I would pick one not mentioned yet. The Monitor and her sisters, both single- and double-turreted. Instrumental in the blockade of the South, they were the single biggest reason European aid did not come to the CSA and allowed the Union to dissect the CSA from both the inside and outside. If the US Civil War had gone another way the whole course of European history in the 20th C. would have been different.

5. The Gato-class fleet submarine. (Surprise!) No single class of ship in WWII was more decisive on a strategic scale. These boats, with their follow-on classes, changed the course of WWII. Far more importnat in the ultimate defeat of Japan than any other platform, including the Essex-class.

For the next five slots, in no order I would include the Essexes. Also the standard RN 74-gun ship-of-the-line of the Napoleonic era, the USS Nautilus, the war junks of the Ming Dynasty, and the HMS Dreadnought.

I think it comes down to how you define the criteria for "Fighting Ship." I think many of your proposals, while excellent, would fall under a list of "most influential" ship designs, i.e., ship designs having the greatest historical impact. Using the definition I proposed, I'm not sure the 74 gun Ship of the Line would apply-While certainly an effective platform, I don't believe it had the service life of the larger HMS VICTORY (although I could be wrong). I agree the GATO and follow on classes would merit consideration for inclusion, although I'm not sure how combat effective they were after about 1955-62. Using my criteria for fighting ship (combat effectiveness over length of service), I'm not sure about the HMS DREADNOUGHT class. While revolutionary, as a class it was rapidly superceded, so that the HMS DREADNOUGHT was relegated to second-line status by the time WWI began, only eight-ten years into its service life, and wassold for scrap after only 15 years.
“Do I not destroy my enemies when I make them my friends?” -Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
1EyedJacks
Posts: 2304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:26 am
Location: Reno, NV

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by 1EyedJacks »

In this game?

1. CL-47 Boise - This rowdy sum-ova-beach is my nightmare
2. BB Yamato - built like a German Tiger and fast enough to chase down her prey.
3. BB King George had speed and armor
4. SS Thrasher - probably the most decorated sub of the war.
5. CV Enterprise - Always seems to lead with her nose but she can sure pack a wallop
6. CV Lexington - The Lady
7. CV Akagi - This ship is always in the thick of things for Japan
8. CL Kitakami - got fish?
9. DD Hibiki - based on the voyages of by Cuttlefish
10. DD Shimakaze - fast, lotsa fish, and can do ASW. Has good range too!



Image
Attachments
Boise.jpg
Boise.jpg (12.9 KiB) Viewed 652 times
TTFN,

Mike
User avatar
CV60
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:40 pm

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by CV60 »

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58



Some posters with a lot more historic knowledge than the "Military Channel" (Iowa class? Seriously?) beat me to the punch overnight, but I'll give my list.





[/quote]

While there is an argument the USS IOWA class shouldn't be on the list, I think its service as a viable warship from 1943-1992 leaves an argument for it being on the list. For your viewing pleasure, here' a photo I took of the USS Iowa in the Gulf of Sidra in 1987:

Image
Attachments
USSIowa1..1resized.jpg
USSIowa1..1resized.jpg (186.14 KiB) Viewed 654 times
“Do I not destroy my enemies when I make them my friends?” -Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: CV60

I think it comes down to how you define the criteria for "Fighting Ship." I think many of your proposals, while excellent, would fall under a list of "most influential" ship designs, i.e., ship designs having the greatest historical impact. Using the definition I proposed, I'm not sure the 74 gun Ship of the Line would apply-While certainly an effective platform, I don't believe it had the service life of the larger HMS VICTORY (although I could be wrong). I agree the GATO and follow on classes would merit consideration for inclusion, although I'm not sure how combat effective they were after about 1955-62. Using my criteria for fighting ship (combat effectiveness over length of service), I'm not sure about the HMS DREADNOUGHT class. While revolutionary, as a class it was rapidly superceded, so that the HMS DREADNOUGHT was relegated to second-line status by the time WWI began, only eight-ten years into its service life, and wassold for scrap after only 15 years.

I agree the definition is key. The Military Channel itself violated it by naming a class and not a ship.

But to me the ability of a ship or a ship class to blast away and sink a bunch of other ships is immaterial. Navies exist to affect events ashore. Nothing else. Those I named did that. The 74-gunner imposed a blockade on Nappy's empire which forced him into continental moves he might not have taken if, say, India were a possibility for him. In that sense the class was highly influential over HMS Victory, which was a fine ship, still is, but didn't change world history by herself.

I also do not see longevity as mattering a bit. If the trireme had been rendered obsolete the day after Salamis it still would have done its job at changing the course of world events. Ditto Dreadnought. It made the world's navies obsolete. (Monitor the same.) If you didn't have a counter for Dreadnought you were not a maritime empire, or soon wouldn't be one.
The Moose
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: 1EyedJacks

In this game?

1. CL-47 Boise - This rowdy sum-ova-beach is my nightmare

Good thing you sank her on the first day. [:)]

2. BB Yamato - built like a German Tiger and fast enough to chase down her prey.

Soon to be toast, my friend. [8D]

3. BB King George had speed and armor
4. SS Thrasher - probably the most decorated sub of the war.

Huh?

5. CV Enterprise - Always seems to lead with her nose but she can sure pack a wallop
6. CV Lexington - The Lady
7. CV Akagi - This ship is always in the thick of things for Japan
8. CL Kitakami - got fish?
9. DD Hibiki - based on the voyages of by Cuttlefish

To be sure.

10. DD Shimakaze - fast, lotsa fish, and can do ASW. Has good range too!


The Moose
User avatar
CV60
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:40 pm

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by CV60 »

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
ORIGINAL: CV60

I think it comes down to how you define the criteria for "Fighting Ship." I think many of your proposals, while excellent, would fall under a list of "most influential" ship designs, i.e., ship designs having the greatest historical impact. Using the definition I proposed, I'm not sure the 74 gun Ship of the Line would apply-While certainly an effective platform, I don't believe it had the service life of the larger HMS VICTORY (although I could be wrong). I agree the GATO and follow on classes would merit consideration for inclusion, although I'm not sure how combat effective they were after about 1955-62. Using my criteria for fighting ship (combat effectiveness over length of service), I'm not sure about the HMS DREADNOUGHT class. While revolutionary, as a class it was rapidly superceded, so that the HMS DREADNOUGHT was relegated to second-line status by the time WWI began, only eight-ten years into its service life, and wassold for scrap after only 15 years.

I agree the definition is key. The Military Channel itself violated it by naming a class and not a ship.

But to me the ability of a ship or a ship class to blast away and sink a bunch of other ships is immaterial. Navies exist to affect events ashore. Nothing else. Those I named did that. The 74-gunner imposed a blockade on Nappy's empire which forced him into continental moves he might not have taken if, say, India were a possibility for him. In that sense the class was highly influential over HMS Visotry, which was a fine ship, still is, but didn't change world history by herself.

I also do not see longevity as mattering a bit. If the trireme had been rendered obsolete the day after Salamis it still would have done its job at changing the course of world events. Ditto Dreadnought. It made the world's navies obsolete. (Monitor the same.) If you didn't have a counter for Dreadnought you were not a maritime empire, or soon wouldn't be one.

This brings up one of the issues with the "revolutionary" vs. "effective" arguments over weapon systems. Frequently, a "revolutionary" weapon system is not effective by the time it actually enters combat because, by sparking a revolution, it itself becomes outmoded by evolutionary follow on developments to the revolution it started. The HMS DREADNAUGHT would be one example. It itself was revolutionary. But the HMS DREADNOUGHT itself was rapidly outclassed by the follow on ships of the revolution it started. The USS IOWA was possibly the apex in terms of combat effectiveness of the revolution begun by the HMS DREADNOUGHT. But without the revolution started by the HMS DREADNOUGHT, there would be no USS IOWA.
“Do I not destroy my enemies when I make them my friends?” -Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by Canoerebel »

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

...4. For this spot I would pick one not mentioned yet. The Monitor and her sisters, both single- and double-turreted. Instrumental in the blockade of the South, they were the single biggest reason European aid did not come to the CSA and allowed the Union to dissect the CSA from both the inside and outside. If the US Civil War had gone another way the whole course of European history in the 20th C. would have been different.
...

No. The biggest single reason European aid did not come to the CSA was slavery. That was a far bigger and broader reason than the Union navy.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

...4. For this spot I would pick one not mentioned yet. The Monitor and her sisters, both single- and double-turreted. Instrumental in the blockade of the South, they were the single biggest reason European aid did not come to the CSA and allowed the Union to dissect the CSA from both the inside and outside. If the US Civil War had gone another way the whole course of European history in the 20th C. would have been different.
...

No. The biggest single reason European aid did not come to the CSA was slavery. That was a far bigger and broader reason than the Union navy.

I think you underestimate Britain's appetite for cotton at the time. They were perfectly willing to trade with the South before the war.

The USS Monitor said to the wooden Royal Navy "Bring it on."
The Moose
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Top Ten fighting ships of all time

Post by Canoerebel »

The US Navy was one aspect, but politcally Britain couldn't bring herself to intervene.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”