ASW groups or singles?

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Phanatikk
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Nashville

ASW groups or singles?

Post by Phanatikk »

JFB.
Is it more lethal and/or efficient to utilize ASW groups, or have individual ships operating on patrol?

-Jeff
Schanilec
Posts: 4038
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Grand Forks, ND

RE: ASW groups or singles?

Post by Schanilec »

Why groups of course.[;)]

You are allowed four per task group.

Don't look for them to be super effective at the beginning of the war. They'll improve.

Good luck.[:)]
This is one Czech that doesn't bounce.
User avatar
inqistor
Posts: 1813
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 1:19 pm

RE: ASW groups or singles?

Post by inqistor »

More important is number of ASW weapons on individual ships.

If you make group, and all vessels have only ONE depth charge launcher it will not be very effective. In most cases only 1-2 ships make attack.
User avatar
Symon
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:59 pm
Location: De Eye-lands, Mon

RE: ASW groups or singles?

Post by Symon »

ORIGINAL: Schanilec
ORIGINAL: Phanatik
JFB.
Is it more lethal and/or efficient to utilize ASW groups, or have individual ships operating on patrol?

-Jeff
Why groups of course.[;)]

You are allowed four per task group.

Don't look for them to be super effective at the beginning of the war. They'll improve.

Good luck.[:)]
Definitely groups. Each individual ship gets a die roll for a DL. The more ships, the better chance that at least one will get a good DL and make a run. It's a 'decreasing' chance, but 'modified' if the prior ship in the TF got a good DL. Single ships get 1 die roll, no modifiers, no nothing. Doesn't matter how many ASW launchers they got. Not goodnik. Sweet spot is 3; 2 is ok, but not quite as good in the probability world, 4 is also ok, but drops off a bit in the probability world.

JWE
Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.
User avatar
Phanatikk
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Nashville

RE: ASW groups or singles?

Post by Phanatikk »

Thanks guys.
Mac Linehan
Posts: 1518
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 9:08 pm
Location: Denver Colorado

RE: ASW groups or singles?

Post by Mac Linehan »

JWE -

Thank You for a succinct, clear response, I shall put this very useful information to work.

ASW Fanboy Mac
LAV-25 2147
Victory is mine
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2013 5:33 pm

RE: ASW groups or singles?

Post by Victory is mine »

Single ship TFs also seem much more vulnerable to sub attack. That's a purely anecdotal observation.

It's pretty tough though to launch an effective DC attack from the bottom of the ocean. :P
User avatar
AW1Steve
Posts: 14527
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:32 am
Location: Mordor aka Illlinois

RE: ASW groups or singles?

Post by AW1Steve »

As a related question, is a ASW group actually more effective then say....8 DD's in a surface combat unit?
rms1pa
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 6:32 am

RE: ASW groups or singles?

Post by rms1pa »

funny you would mention that Steve,

i don't know the algorythms but when i had a surface group leaving Seattle the subs potted one of the APDs, after the attack the APDs did some searching and dropping.

rms/pa
there is a technical term for those who confuse the opinions of an author's characters for the opinions of the author.
the term is IDIOT.
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”