CLOSED The old world vs the new: Cannonfodder (Allies) vs Quixote (Japan)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5246
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: What do you think?

Post by zuluhour »

I think your opponent is proficient, you must respect this.
User avatar
KenchiSulla
Posts: 2963
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: the Netherlands

RE: What do you think?

Post by KenchiSulla »

Should make for a very interesting game ;)..

Quixote sure knows what he is doing, no doubt about that. Lets see what I can do to slow him down.
AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20695
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: What do you think?

Post by BBfanboy »

Incredible that Singapore would not inflict more casualties on the Japanese than a mere 870. The troops must have been fed propaganda about the Japanese having Geisha houses for POWs.

Good job on that invasion convoy! Seven allied torp hits scored for none by the Japanese - great dice roll!
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
KenchiSulla
Posts: 2963
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: the Netherlands

RE: What do you think?

Post by KenchiSulla »

21-dec-1941

As said before, biggest news is the fall of Singapore.

As for other news:
- Australian cruisers are unmolested and on the way to Sydney
- Dutch Harbour is reinforced by the 201st infantry regiment
- 14th army is now planning for Colombo (might be important, might be a ruse. I'll start considering it once Port Blair falls)
- Imperial Guards are nowhere to be seen yet
- Dutch navy bombards Horn Island and damages the base / Kisaraga anchored there
- Imperial carriers sweep past the north coast of Darwin picking off stragglers. A couple of ships are in danger of being sunk (including the heavily damaged Danae, now heading for Capetown)



Image
Attachments
Oops.jpg
Oops.jpg (451.88 KiB) Viewed 332 times
AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: What do you think?

Post by JocMeister »

10 Euro he will come for Perth before February is up!
Image
User avatar
KenchiSulla
Posts: 2963
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: the Netherlands

RE: What do you think?

Post by KenchiSulla »

22nd/23rd december

Fairly quiet turns. The fleet carriers of the coast of Port Hedland turned back and left my shipping @ peace..

Port Blair is bombed. This means I won't be able to dig in much. Shock attack with a division should neutralise it..

Morning Air attack on Port Blair , at 46,58

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid spotted at 19 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 21
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 43

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-IIa Sally: 14 damaged

Allied ground losses:
6 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Airbase hits 14
Airbase supply hits 11
Runway hits 49

Aircraft Attacking:
17 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 8000 feet
Airfield Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb
26 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 8000 feet
Airfield Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb


The US fleet arrive at Sydney and repair minor damage from the travel. East coast of Australia is covered well by Patrol Planes now.

Japanese troops land at Koumac. New Caledonia is nearly undefended.

Side note:
I am going on a short holiday (one week) tommorow so the AAR will quiet down. Will be back though...
AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5246
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: What do you think?

Post by zuluhour »

enjoy your break.
User avatar
KenchiSulla
Posts: 2963
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: the Netherlands

RE: What do you think?

Post by KenchiSulla »

Back from the fairy tale camping site (2 year old loved it) and back to the war!

24-dec-1941

China

The main push is taking place above Hankow (nearly 3000 AV) with (armoured) flanking movements as far up as Paotow. I would say Quixote is trying to envelop Chungking from the north.

Closing down China requires (or at least it speeds things up) taking Rangoon. No major moves are made into Burma yet.

A couple of 100 Chinese AV is now destroyed and at least 1200 AV in direct danger.

Image

Cruisers and an old destroyer strike mines at Banjoewangi

TF 276 encounters mine field at Banjoewangi (57,107)

Japanese Ships
DD Umikaze, Mine hits 1, heavy damage
CL Abukuma, Mine hits 1
CL Yura, Mine hits 1

2 mines cleared


Koumac is captured on New Caledonia... I am worried about not having seaplanes to search the area north of New Caledonia. Establishing a base at Norfolk should become a priority.
Attachments
China.jpg
China.jpg (818 KiB) Viewed 332 times
AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
User avatar
Bif1961
Posts: 2014
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:52 pm
Location: Phenix City, Alabama

RE: What do you think?

Post by Bif1961 »

TF 276 encounters mine field at Banjoewangi (57,107)

Japanese Ships
DD Umikaze, Mine hits 1, heavy damage
CL Abukuma, Mine hits 1
CL Yura, Mine hits 1

2 mines cleared

With three ships hitting mines shouldn't have been three mines cleared? [;)]
User avatar
KenchiSulla
Posts: 2963
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: the Netherlands

RE: What do you think?

Post by KenchiSulla »

25-dec-1941
26-dec-1941

Northern Australia

My best guess is that Wyndham is going to be invaded. If my recon is correct its not a big force landing and thats pushing it against Darwin. It might be just the first wave though..

20+ Hudsons are set to naval bomb next turn. Not expecting to much from that.. Navy is staying out of it as the area is a deathtrap for ships..

Image

Air war:
3 to 1 odds in favour of the allies today with a total of 60 Japanese aircraft (mostly Sally and Nells) destroyed. Running out of fighters... I am looking forward to the Hurricanes I am going to receive in 1942...
Attachments
2782013211520.jpg
2782013211520.jpg (308.66 KiB) Viewed 332 times
AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
User avatar
KenchiSulla
Posts: 2963
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: the Netherlands

RE: What do you think?

Post by KenchiSulla »

27-dec-1941

56th infantry division and 8th tank regiment land at Darwin. The Australian defenders might last a few days but not much longer..

Night Time Surface Combat, near Darwin at 76,124, Range 11,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CA Myoko, Shell hits 1
CL Kinu
DD Hayashio
DD Yamakaze
DD Asagiri

Allied Ships
AM Warrnambool, Shell hits 5, and is sunk

Night Naval bombardment of Darwin at 76,124 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

3 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
BB Hyuga
BB Ise
BB Nagato

Allied ground losses:
296 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 31 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Guns lost 11 (1 destroyed, 10 disabled)

Pre-Invasion action off Darwin (76,124) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

166 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
BB Fuso, Shell hits 2
DD Wakaba, Shell hits 1
xAK Kamogawa Maru, Shell hits 1, heavy fires
DD Hatsuharu
xAK Azuma Maru, Shell hits 4, on fire
xAK Katuragi Maru
APD Hagi
xAP Hakone Maru
xAK Mito Maru

Japanese ground losses:
61 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 4 (2 destroyed, 2 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
97 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Guns lost 6 (1 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Amphibious Assault at Darwin (76,124)

TF 273 troops unloading over beach at Darwin, 76,124

Japanese ground losses:
153 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 3 (3 destroyed, 0 disabled)

17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost in surf during unload of 56th Div /4
16 troops of a IJA Cavalry Squad lost from landing craft during unload of 56th Div /5
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost in surf during unload of 56th Div /6
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad accidentally lost during unload of 56th Div /8
Type 97 Tankette accidentally lost during unload of 56th Div /8
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost overboard during unload of 56th Div /9
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost from landing craft during unload of 56th Div /10
10 Support troops lost overboard during unload of 56th Div /11
10 Support troops lost in surf during unload of 56th Div /12
10 Support troops lost overboard during unload of 56th Div /14
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost overboard during unload of 56th Div /16
Type 95 Light Tank dropped into water during unload of 8th Tank Rgt
Motorized Support lost from landing craft during unload of 8th Tank Rgt /4

Invasion Support action off Darwin (76,124) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

76 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
BB Fuso, Shell hits 1
DD Wakaba
DD Hatsuharu
DD Suzukaze, Shell hits 1, on fire
xAK Azuma Maru, Shell hits 1, on fire
APD Hagi

Japanese ground losses:
39 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Invasion Support action off Darwin (76,124)
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

38 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
xAK Azuma Maru, Shell hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
APD Hagi
BB Fuso
xAK Katuragi Maru
CM Itsukushima
xAK Nitiran Maru
xAK Mito Maru

Ground combat at Darwin (76,124)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 3903 troops, 61 guns, 9 vehicles, Assault Value = 205

Defending force 12972 troops, 103 guns, 196 vehicles, Assault Value = 493

Japanese ground losses:
11 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
19th Australian Battalion
Gull Battalion
2/4 MG Battalion
Sparrow Battalion
2/2nd Ind Coy
Emery Point Fortress
7th Mil. District
2nd RAN Base Force
Darwin RAAF Base Force

Defending units:
8th Tank Regiment
56th Division
AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: What do you think?

Post by Capt. Harlock »

Ground combat at Darwin (76,124)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 3903 troops, 61 guns, 9 vehicles, Assault Value = 205

Defending force 12972 troops, 103 guns, 196 vehicles, Assault Value = 493

"Not a big force"?? Some recon pilots clearly need to be disciplined . . . [X(][X(]
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
KenchiSulla
Posts: 2963
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: the Netherlands

RE: What do you think?

Post by KenchiSulla »

Indeed.. They must have missed a couple of troop ships there.

28-dec-1941

Northern Australia

The Australians were able to hold the first shock attack at Darwin disabling about a hundred squads.

Ground combat at Darwin (76,124)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 12113 troops, 103 guns, 58 vehicles, Assault Value = 503

Defending force 7391 troops, 90 guns, 42 vehicles, Assault Value = 206

Japanese adjusted assault: 80

Allied adjusted defense: 170

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 2)

Combat modifiers
Defender: forts(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
1126 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 99 disabled
Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 9 disabled

Allied ground losses:
360 casualties reported
Squads: 11 destroyed, 34 disabled
Non Combat: 5 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 8 disabled
Guns lost 5 (2 destroyed, 3 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Assaulting units:
8th Tank Regiment
56th Division

Defending units:
2/2nd Ind Coy
19th Australian Battalion
2/4 MG Battalion
Gull Battalion
Sparrow Battalion
Emery Point Fortress
2nd RAN Base Force
7th Mil. District
Darwin RAAF Base Force


2/2nd Ind Coy was destroyed. Mobile forces (cavalry and armour) are being moved up North to ensure no raiders come down and make life even more miserable after Darwin falls..

Southeast Asia

The convoy (harrassed by dutch submarines, sinking one cargo vessel) I spotted earlier moving up the Malacca strait is heading further north, now confirmed supported by carriers. My guess is Port Blair is the target (but ofcourse, I have been wrong before). A cruiser force build around Cornwall and Exeter will position to strike any invasion fleet bound for Port Blair. I have decent patrol plane coverage so shouldn't get suprised.
Image
Attachments
288201390632.jpg
288201390632.jpg (381.46 KiB) Viewed 332 times
AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
User avatar
KenchiSulla
Posts: 2963
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: the Netherlands

RE: What do you think?

Post by KenchiSulla »

Managed to extract pieces of interesting information from the SIGINT.

SIG INT REPORT FOR Dec 28, 41

1/38th Division is loaded on xAP Kitano Maru moving to San Fernando.
16/16th Division is planning for an attack on Mauban.


This means that one, perhaps two divisions are going to be deployed on Luzon. This is good news for me as I am in a fairly strong position on Clark and Bataan with a lot of supplies pulled out of Manila.

6/2nd Division is loaded on a Japanese CL moving to Georgetown.

The only thing I can make of this is that 2nd division might be redeployed to Burma OR Quixote is trying to hide the real destination of 2nd division. Might be that 2nd division is heading for Port Blair.

Another possibility (worst case) is that 2nd division is on ships together with 14th army (planning for Colombo, fragments loaded on ships) and heading for Ceylon..

No airforce in place and only british cruisers to counter that thrust. With just one brigade on the Island it would quickly fall.
Sadly, I don't have confirmation of a fragment of 2nd prepping for assault...
AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
User avatar
KenchiSulla
Posts: 2963
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: the Netherlands

RE: What do you think?

Post by KenchiSulla »

29-dec-1941
30-dec-1941
31-dec-1941

The attempt to intercept a landing at Port Blair was a failure.. With the ships in position to strike, the convoy made a sudden move at high speed past Port Blair and in the direction of Ceylon. The escorting carriers launched a strike with devastating accuracy:

Morning Air attack on TF, near Little Andaman at 40,56

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 80 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 30 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 37
B5N2 Kate x 13
D3A1 Val x 13

Japanese aircraft losses
B5N2 Kate: 6 damaged
D3A1 Val: 9 damaged
D3A1 Val: 1 destroyed by flak

Allied Ships
CL Enterprise, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
CL Mauritius, Torpedo hits 2, heavy damage
CA Exeter, Torpedo hits 2
CL Glasgow, Bomb hits 1, on fire


38% of the torpedoes struck fast moving cruisers... Ouch

Mauritius is lost in the subsequent turn but the other ships manage to slip away. Looks like two divisions will be landing at Ceylon in the first week of january (defended by 3 Indian brigades) One looks like to be in reserve around Georgetown (sigint).

The convoy that unloaded 18th Brit at Madras is going to escape but only just.. Lucky that I made the decision to stop unloading supplies and reroute the ships to the west coast of India.

Burma seems to heat up. 5 units (at least a tank regiment and possibly the Imperial Guards are starting to move into Pegu from the SE. I am moving out of Rangoon and will delay the advance at Pegu while trying to slip the rest of the troops out North. Once Ceylon falls (foregone conclusion) there is nothing keeping me in Burma.

Looking back at december Quixote is advancing rapidly. He makes good use of his knowledge of troop dispositions for the allies at game start. Japan simply can't be stopped and can make some daring moves deep into allied territory. He is still positioned to strike on either India or Australia but looking at his troop movements (Java being ignored for now) and his committment of carriers into the bay of Bengal I would say an invasion of India is more likely.
AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: What do you think?

Post by JocMeister »

Bah, thats sucks! Tough luck. [:(]
Image
User avatar
KenchiSulla
Posts: 2963
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: the Netherlands

RE: What do you think?

Post by KenchiSulla »

01-jan-1942
02-jan-1942

Remember those transports I thought had evaded the IJN? They really didn't. Forgetting to reroute them I managed to get them in striking position of japanese carriers (and on top of a couple of submarines blockading Colombo). All but one are lost in the attacks.

There are always more transport ships. But not enough ports. Japanese land in strength at Trincomalee


Ground combat at Trincomalee (31,47)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 5848 troops, 71 guns, 45 vehicles, Assault Value = 78

Defending force 43736 troops, 378 guns, 484 vehicles, Assault Value = 1518

Allied ground losses:
19 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Assaulting units:
Trincomalee Fortress
99th Indian Brigade

Defending units:
2nd Division
1st Tank Regiment
4th Tank Regiment
48th Division
7th Tank Regiment
5th Div /3
25th Army /4


We are probably looking at a 2 week campaign to clear the Island. After that those troops are in a good position to create a bridgehead on Indian Mainland..

Coastal guns managed to shoot up a lot of (transport ships). That has to count for something (....)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Trincomalee at 31,47 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

53 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
CA Kako, Shell hits 5
CA Suzuya, Shell hits 1
CA Mikuma
CA Mogami
CA Chokai

Allied ground losses:
22 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Pre-Invasion action off Trincomalee (31,47) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

226 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
CL Oi
DD Namikaze
DD Nokaze
DD Akikaze, Shell hits 1
AK Kinka Maru

Japanese ground losses:
126 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 12 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Amphibious Assault at Trincomalee (31,47)

TF 110 troops unloading over beach at Trincomalee, 31,47

Japanese ground losses:
106 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 5 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Pre-Invasion action off Trincomalee (31,47) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

132 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
CL Sendai
DD Shinonome, Shell hits 1, heavy fires
xAK Awazisan Maru, Shell hits 1
DD Murakumo
AK Kyushu Maru

Japanese ground losses:
Vehicles lost 11 (1 destroyed, 10 disabled)

Amphibious Assault at Trincomalee (31,47)

TF 143 troops unloading over beach at Trincomalee, 31,47

Japanese ground losses:
Vehicles lost 2 (2 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Pre-Invasion action off Trincomalee (31,47) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

136 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
CL Isuzu, Shell hits 4
xAK Sydney Maru, Shell hits 3, on fire
TB Kari
xAK Kashii Maru, Shell hits 3, heavy fires
TB Hiyodori
TB Otori
AMC Bankok Maru

Japanese ground losses:
133 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 14 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Amphibious Assault at Trincomalee (31,47)

TF 173 troops unloading over beach at Trincomalee, 31,47

Japanese ground losses:
348 casualties reported
Squads: 17 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 12 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 2 (2 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Pre-Invasion action off Trincomalee (31,47) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

95 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
CL Jintsu
xAK Hakkai Maru, Shell hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
DD Minegumo
xAK Arima Maru, Shell hits 1, on fire
AMC Saigon Maru

Japanese ground losses:
98 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Amphibious Assault at Trincomalee (31,47)

TF 174 troops unloading over beach at Trincomalee, 31,47

Japanese ground losses:
210 casualties reported
Squads: 10 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 8 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 4 (4 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Invasion Support action off Trincomalee (31,47) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

86 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
CL Oi, Shell hits 2
DD Nokaze, Shell hits 4, on fire
xAP Mizuho Maru, Shell hits 3, on fire
DD Akikaze
xAP Husimi Maru, Shell hits 4, on fire
AK Kinka Maru
DD Namikaze

Japanese ground losses:
63 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Invasion Support action off Trincomalee (31,47) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

79 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
CL Isuzu, Shell hits 7, on fire
AMC Bankok Maru, Shell hits 7, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAK Sydney Maru, Shell hits 3, heavy fires
TB Kari
xAK Asosan Maru, Shell hits 3, heavy fires
APD Aoi

Japanese ground losses:
54 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Invasion Support action off Trincomalee (31,47) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

70 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
CL Jintsu, Shell hits 1
AMC Saigon Maru, Shell hits 1
DD Minegumo

Japanese ground losses:
56 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Invasion Support action off Trincomalee (31,47) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

39 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
CL Sendai, Shell hits 3, on fire
xAK Awazisan Maru, Shell hits 2, on fire
DD Shinonome, heavy fires
AK Kyushu Maru

Invasion Support action off Trincomalee (31,47)
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

19 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
xAP Husimi Maru, Shell hits 5, heavy fires, heavy damage
CL Oi
DD Akikaze
xAP Mizuho Maru, Shell hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Kinka Maru, Shell hits 5, on fire
DD Namikaze

Invasion Support action off Trincomalee (31,47)
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

20 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
xAK Ayatosan Maru, Shell hits 3
CL Sendai
DD Murakumo
xAK Awazisan Maru, Shell hits 3, heavy fires
xAK Brisbane Maru, Shell hits 3, on fire
DD Shinonome
AK Kyushu Maru, Shell hits 2, on fire

Invasion Support action off Trincomalee (31,47)

54 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
xAK Atutasan Maru, Shell hits 4, heavy fires
APD Aoi
TB Otori
CL Isuzu
TB Hiyodori
xAK Sydney Maru, Shell hits 1, heavy fires
AMC Bankok Maru, heavy fires, heavy damage
TB Kari

Japanese ground losses:
98 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 15 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Invasion Support action off Trincomalee (31,47)
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

9 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
xAK Arima Maru, Shell hits 2, heavy fires
CL Jintsu
E Kunashiri
AMC Saigon Maru


Ships are spotted moving in on Diego Garcia. I would say about 70% - 80% of the japanese carriers are supporting the operation. I am not convinced Quixote is using all of them



Image
Attachments
30-8-2013 9-32-57.jpg
30-8-2013 9-32-57.jpg (414.72 KiB) Viewed 332 times
AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
User avatar
DOCUP
Posts: 3131
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:38 pm

RE: What do you think?

Post by DOCUP »

Your CD guns did pretty well.
User avatar
KenchiSulla
Posts: 2963
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: the Netherlands

RE: What do you think?

Post by KenchiSulla »

3-jan-1942

Darwin falls after being heavily disrupted by bombarding battleships. Quixote dropped paratroopers at Fenton earlier but it looks like the battered remnants of Darwins defenders might get out as they retreated SE instead of S.

Night Naval bombardment of Darwin at 76,124 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

53 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
BB Hyuga
BB Ise
BB Fuso
BB Nagato
DD Hatsuharu
DD Kawakaze
DD Yamakaze
DD Hayashio, Shell hits 1

Allied ground losses:
488 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 12 disabled
Non Combat: 12 destroyed, 31 disabled
Engineers: 4 destroyed, 6 disabled
Guns lost 7 (1 destroyed, 6 disabled)


Ground combat at Darwin (76,124)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 12141 troops, 103 guns, 202 vehicles, Assault Value = 408

Defending force 6800 troops, 87 guns, 42 vehicles, Assault Value = 172

Japanese adjusted assault: 211

Allied adjusted defense: 41

Japanese assault odds: 5 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Darwin !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: disruption(-), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
224 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 25 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Allied ground losses:
2914 casualties reported
Squads: 76 destroyed, 30 disabled
Non Combat: 201 destroyed, 14 disabled
Engineers: 54 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 35 (31 destroyed, 4 disabled)
Vehicles lost 48 (40 destroyed, 8 disabled)
Units retreated 7
Units destroyed 1


Trincomalee falls to shock attack as well. Two tank regiments and the 5th infantry pursuing..

Ground combat at Trincomalee (31,47)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 26619 troops, 255 guns, 83 vehicles, Assault Value = 1527

Defending force 5855 troops, 71 guns, 45 vehicles, Assault Value = 79

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 1199

Allied adjusted defense: 93

Japanese assault odds: 12 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Trincomalee !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
333 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 23 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Units pursuing 4

Allied ground losses:
5595 casualties reported
Squads: 46 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 283 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 48 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 63 (63 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 29 (29 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 1
Units destroyed 1


1st Burma division is very ineffective. Trying to withdraw it north.

Ground combat at Pegu (55,53)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 4361 troops, 70 guns, 90 vehicles, Assault Value = 176

Defending force 8996 troops, 63 guns, 45 vehicles, Assault Value = 326

Japanese adjusted assault: 71

Allied adjusted defense: 56

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: preparation(-), morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
59 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
295 casualties reported
Squads: 24 destroyed, 17 disabled
Non Combat: 7 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
14th Tank Regiment
112th Infantry Regiment
15th Army
55th Mountain Gun Regiment
21st Medium Field Artillery Battalion

Defending units:
4th Burma Rifles Battalion
1st Burma Division


Disheartening to look at.
AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
User avatar
KenchiSulla
Posts: 2963
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: the Netherlands

RE: What do you think?

Post by KenchiSulla »

I am trying to place the attack on Ceylon in perspective:

Strategic objectives of the Empire of Japan:

- Secure resources to continue fighting the war
- Secure sufficient bases to support the war effort
- Secure a defensive perimeter to protect existing and captured assets
- Damage or destroy allied land, sea and air forces
- Deprive the allies of good staging areas for future offensive operations


At first glance it could be any of the following

- Secure sufficient bases to support the war effort
- Secure a defensive perimeter to protect existing and captured assets
- Damage or destroy allied land, sea and air forces
- Deprive the allies of good staging areas for future offensive operations

Right now losing Ceylon hurts. It will probably be used as a staging area for attacking India. But looking at the bright side, Japanese internal sealanes are already lengthening considerably..

The allies should now work to interdict the Singapore - Ceylon supply line. Submarines is what I can use here..

AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”