Hairy Asian Experiences - GreyJoy (J) vs. Q-Ball (A)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Clash of Titans...another allied victory?

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy

Aren't the replacements taken on a weekly basis instead of a daily one? I have already re-built a division from scratch and it took me nearly 6 months to get it back at 100/100, even dividing it into 3 rgts... strange!

However the point isn't the time needed. The point is the PPs and HIs spent to do it.

If you consider that to buy a destroyed division and to change it to an unrestricted command HQ costs 650 PPs... then you need...how many ARM and VEH points to rebuilt it?...Am not that good at math, but I know the cost is high and you have so many other units coming online to be fed with those pools (ARM and VEH) that the cost might simply be too high, also considering you are getting a brand new rebuilt division with low morale and low experience...

If the unit is in a hex with an HQ (and I think it can be any, not just command) it will take replacements daily instead of every three days.

Anyway it works in the HI where I've been rebuilding things, and they get up to speed a lot faster than if I shipped them out immediately somewhere else and waited for it to happen there. I've had it work this way in Burma too though.

The cost is high, but it's a division!
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: The Clash of Titans...another allied victory?

Post by GreyJoy »

Feb 5, 1944

Brad is driving me crazy...

Another massive landing on the other side of the map.

Ramree island is invested. A full indian division, supported by a motorized brigade, landed at Ramree Island. LSIs and LSTs, supported by a RN cruiser force.
The invaders met 3 rather weak infantry regiments and a mortar battalion.
I forgot to give escort to 2 Judy sentais... they took off from Rangoon and got slaughtered by his LRCAP from Akyab. 40 of them got shot down with only a few passing through and making the attack, placing only a single 500kg bomb on a British CL...
We got a little revenge in central Burma, where we ambushed 80 Vengeances attacking the 48th/C Div moving in the jungle east of Akyab...downing 70 of them for no loss[8D]. The Burma air Army continues with its incredible score!

At Sarmi the landings continue unmolested. I'm holding my counter move here, waiting for his CVs to pop up.


So now we have American CVEs near Hollandia, more near Port Hedland (with some APAs spotted there), a cruiser force in the Bay of Bengal (approx. 14 hexes NW of Port Blair), not to consider the fake invasion of Wake Island and the series of decoy TFs in the I.O. west of Sumatra...

He's clearly trying to attack on multiple vector, in order to puzzle my defences and unbalance me.

Here now I need discipline. I cannot go and defend everywhere, nor I can react to every attempt of his to drive away my attention, my focus.

My bet: his CVs may be in two places basically: hidden in the Coral Sea, behind New Britain, waiting for a penetration towards Woleai (CENTPAC), or in the I.O., in order to jump on Sumatra as soon as I eat one of his other baits.

Also they could be near Cylon...waiting for an operation against the Adamans...

Sarmi is important, but not decisive.
Ramree is important. But he has already landed there. I have a plan to defend my western Burmese flank.
The Mariannas are covered.
The Kuriles are impracticable (blizzard time).
Sumatra, the Adamans and Timor are the priorities. Discipline Greyjoy. Stay focused and don't go hunting lullabies and ghosts .
veji1
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 5:28 pm

RE: The Clash of Titans...another allied victory?

Post by veji1 »

This is the very difficult moment when the Jap player still has fairly strong capabilities, ie KB + an LBA that still packs a punch with quality pilots, but they are a one shot thing. on the other hand the allies have overwhelming superiority but are still vulnerable to this one shot, and there for try to drive you crazy, force you to disperse and punch shadows while they keep up their timetable....

On the one hand by keeping your cards close to your chest and not reacting much to his operations you let him advance, but on the other hand if you reacted then he could strike hard somewhere else..

And most important, all he needs is to blunt your spear once, and than he can advance head on, without much subtelty... Doesn't need to sink the whole KB, but sink a few CVs, damage a few other and most importantly savage for good your CV air arm, and adios feints and counterfeints, he can charge head on.

That in february 44 you are still in this situation although by early 43 he already was starting to attack the DEI is a testament to your defense. Keep hanging on ! BANZAI
Adieu Ô Dieu odieux... signé Adam
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: The Clash of Titans...another allied victory?

Post by GreyJoy »

ORIGINAL: veji1

This is the very difficult moment when the Jap player still has fairly strong capabilities, ie KB + an LBA that still packs a punch with quality pilots, but they are a one shot thing. on the other hand the allies have overwhelming superiority but are still vulnerable to this one shot, and there for try to drive you crazy, force you to disperse and punch shadows while they keep up their timetable....

On the one hand by keeping your cards close to your chest and not reacting much to his operations you let him advance, but on the other hand if you reacted then he could strike hard somewhere else..

And most important, all he needs is to blunt your spear once, and than he can advance head on, without much subtelty... Doesn't need to sink the whole KB, but sink a few CVs, damage a few other and most importantly savage for good your CV air arm, and adios feints and counterfeints, he can charge head on.

That in february 44 you are still in this situation although by early 43 he already was starting to attack the DEI is a testament to your defense. Keep hanging on ! BANZAI

Very true Veji. It's a stressful moment. I cannot risk to distrupt my "spear" against a feint or a minor vector. I have to give priorities. I'd like to defend anywhere, obviously, but it's simply not possible. I need to understand that not every base or part of the map has the same importance. Sarmi? Is Sarmi that important? Is Ramree Island that important?... hard to say. Strategically they are critical places, cause once fallen, they open the doors to Burma and to upper NG... but if he lands clear in Java/Sumatra it's a check and mate. And I cannot let it happen.
It's also true that he could "use" this dilemma I have and, as u say, simply keep on feinting and advancing with low risk operations...

food for thoughts for sure...

Here's a map that should explain better than 100k words the problem i'm now facing

Image
Attachments
ygygbhjgyghbjhb.jpg
ygygbhjgyghbjhb.jpg (305.03 KiB) Viewed 176 times
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: The Clash of Titans...another allied victory?

Post by ny59giants »

Rebuilding a division - You are doing things partially right. [;)] If within range of a Command HQ, an LCU will take replace squads/devices daily (of course have adequate supply and support squads over the minimum help). If within range of just an Army or Corp HQ, it will take replaces once every three days. Once I divide a division into three, I change leaders so I don't have one with lots of skills in the 40s. A really poor leader will slow down the rebuilding process.

Rear Area Units Refitting
Units can be moved to a rear area to reconstitute (ideally out of a malaria or cold zone or in a base large enough to negate the effects). If the units are in the rear area to restore disabled elements, reduce fatigue, and replace lost elements, assign unit leaders using the following order of priorities:
• Administration – Influences ability to use Supply to reduce Disruption and Fatigue.
• Inspiration – Influences fatigue reduction, morale reduction due to fatigue, disabled elements destroyed due to fatigue, and assault value for attack and defense.
• Leadership – Influences experience gain (this is unimportant if the unit has already reached the maximum training experience).
• Of small import, Land Skill – Influences attacking & defending LCU assault value, firing accuracy and experience gain.
• No other skills or qualities have any influence
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: The Clash of Titans...another allied victory?

Post by GreyJoy »

ORIGINAL: veji1



That in february 44 you are still in this situation although by early 43 he already was starting to attack the DEI is a testament to your defense. Keep hanging on ! BANZAI


Yes, we paid an heavy price in order to slow him down in the southern DEI. My pools, despite still decent, will never be what they used to be at the beginning of 1943. The IJNAF lost pretty much all its experienced bombing pilots. We have decent ones now, but nothing compared to what used to be.
After all I have some regrets. I have met the allied CVs 4 times now, and I never managed to inflict a decisive defeat to them. It's always been a minor victory...nothing really decisive.
In Jan 1943 we've encountered the enemies near Townville and we, despite a complete superiority, sunk only 1 BB and 1 CV (even if damaging 3 more CVs).
Then we had the clash near Ocean Island...where 3 enemy's CVEs were lost but at the cost of 400 ija pilots...
Then near Hansa Bay...again many damaged CVs but not a single one sunk (Yorktown, who had been reported sunk in that battle, was recently confirmed alive by jap intel[:o]).
We had that disastrous operation against his CVs parked at Darwin, where we lost 500 more pilots...
Then at Kaimana... finally we sunk 3 CVs and damaged the Wasp for the 3rd time... but, yet again, the allies maintain a huge superiority now in 1944, even if we never lost a CV...

Not to talk about the surface fleet. 2 BBs 10 CLs and countless number of DDs lost in the southern DEI during the series of battles that raged in 1943 during his advance from Darwin to Saumlaki and the northern coast of NG...

Really an heavy price...but was necessary. The oil kept on flowing till feb 1944...and that is the main goal... everything else is irrilevant
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: The Clash of Titans...another allied victory?

Post by GreyJoy »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Rebuilding a division - You are doing things partially right. [;)] If within range of a Command HQ, an LCU will take replace squads/devices daily (of course have adequate supply and support squads over the minimum help). If within range of just an Army or Corp HQ, it will take replaces once every three days. Once I divide a division into three, I change leaders so I don't have one with lots of skills in the 40s. A really poor leader will slow down the rebuilding process.

Rear Area Units Refitting
Units can be moved to a rear area to reconstitute (ideally out of a malaria or cold zone or in a base large enough to negate the effects). If the units are in the rear area to restore disabled elements, reduce fatigue, and replace lost elements, assign unit leaders using the following order of priorities:
• Administration – Influences ability to use Supply to reduce Disruption and Fatigue.
• Inspiration – Influences fatigue reduction, morale reduction due to fatigue, disabled elements destroyed due to fatigue, and assault value for attack and defense.
• Leadership – Influences experience gain (this is unimportant if the unit has already reached the maximum training experience).
• Of small import, Land Skill – Influences attacking & defending LCU assault value, firing accuracy and experience gain.
• No other skills or qualities have any influence

Thanks Micheal! I completely forgot the HQ bonuses connected to the rebuilding... i'll try to do that!
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: The Clash of Titans...another allied victory?

Post by GreyJoy »

My top scorer aces

Image
Attachments
ygygbhjgyghbjhb.jpg
ygygbhjgyghbjhb.jpg (497.94 KiB) Viewed 176 times
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: The Clash of Titans...another allied victory?

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
It's a stressful moment. I cannot risk to distrupt my "spear" against a feint or a minor vector.

Through the sacrifice of your digital kamikazes, you've been given a supreme weapon. As it was IRL, the kamikaze gave the USN pause and forced a reaction to their implementation. All this without a credible threat from KB at this late juncture of the war. Imagine how effective swarms of kamikazes PLUS KB acting together simultaneously could be against the Allied fleet?

My point? Expand your horizons. Embrace this other "new" weapon system you've been given. It-at least for the time being-can help even the odds against the Allied threat. You've more than one 'spear' in your arsenal. Denying the development and deployment of the Special Air Units is denying yourself flexibility and opportunity.
Image
User avatar
Cribtop
Posts: 3890
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 1:42 pm
Location: Lone Star Nation

RE: The Clash of Titans...another allied victory?

Post by Cribtop »

Concerning your question on the front page.

I am disturbed about the 9000 ft hard code. That would negate RL kami tactics and more advanced Nemo kami tactics of multiple groups on multiple altitudes to wear out and slip past CAP.

However, in appropriate numbers they are still useful to you. You can combine kamis and regular attacks at different altitudes, each helping the other past CAP. Also, kamis can help you empty the untrained pilot pools to reduce the HI tax.
Image
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

THE HEAD OF THE SNAKE

Post by GreyJoy »

Feb 6, 1944

So here it comes.

While a fierce battle over the skies and in the waters of Sarmi and Ramree Is. rages on, the allies finally reveal their main vector:
FROM BROOME to KOEPANG-ROTI!!!

Several TFs including APA/AKA/LSTs and at least 2 CVEs TFs and 2 CV/CVL TFs suddenly popped up. Also the major BBs are present.
The most advanced TFs on his advance are 7 hexes southwest of Koepang.
The only Kamikaze Sentai took off and hit something, while the rest of my air army keeps on jumping from base to base in order to avoid his sweeps.

The KB is spotted at Makassar, while my SAGs are at Lautem and Kendari... we are in a perfect position. Could not ask for anything more.

Lots of para operations are repulsed at Pantar and Weitar...he wants to isolate Timor...

Lost few minor naval engagements today... but now the decisive battle is upon us. The battle we've been waiting for more than 2 years. The real clash of Titans.

We win or we lose. There's no grey colour waiting for us.

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Feb 06, 44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Sarmi at 91,114, Range 9,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CL Kitakami
DD Kamikaze
DD Oite, Shell hits 1
DD Yunagi
DD Yukaze
DD Tachikaze
DD Tatsukaze
DD Suruyame

Allied Ships
DD Fanning
DD Cushing

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Sarmi at 91,114, Range 10,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CL Kitakami, Shell hits 2
DD Kamikaze
DD Oite, Shell hits 1
DD Yunagi, Shell hits 1
DD Yukaze
DD Tachikaze
DD Tatsukaze
DD Suruyame

Allied Ships
DD Nestor
DD Napier, Shell hits 1


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Sarmi at 91,114, Range 8,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CL Kitakami, Shell hits 2
DD Kamikaze, Shell hits 1
DD Oite
DD Yunagi, Shell hits 1, heavy fires
DD Yukaze
DD Tachikaze, Shell hits 3, on fire
DD Tatsukaze, Shell hits 1
DD Suruyame

Allied Ships
DD Ammen, Shell hits 2
DD Bradford, Shell hits 1
DD Bush, Shell hits 2


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Ramree Island at 54,48, Range 2,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CL Isuzu
DD Naganami
DD Asashio
DD Oshio
DD Minegumo
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Ayanami
CL Teshio

Allied Ships
MTB 275
MTB 276
MTB 277
MTB 278
MTB 279
MTB 280, Shell hits 1, and is sunk

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Sarmi at 92,114, Range 8,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
E Fuyo
E Karukaya
E Susuki
E Yanagi
E Kamo

Allied Ships
DD Fanning, Shell hits 1
DD Cushing, Shell hits 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Sarmi at 91,114, Range 9,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CL Sakawa
DD Matsu
DD Okikaze
DD Shiokaze
DD Yakaze
DD Hokaze
DD Nokaze
DD Tawakaze

Allied Ships
DD Eaton
DD Gillespie


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Ramree Island at 53,47, Range 2,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CL Isuzu
DD Naganami
DD Asashio
DD Oshio
DD Minegumo
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Ayanami
CL Teshio

Allied Ships
MTB 275
MTB 276
MTB 277
MTB 278
MTB 279, Shell hits 1, and is sunk

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Sarmi at 91,114, Range 8,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CL Sakawa, Shell hits 1
DD Matsu, Shell hits 14, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DD Okikaze, Shell hits 1, on fire
DD Shiokaze
DD Yakaze
DD Hokaze
DD Nokaze, Shell hits 1
DD Tawakaze

Allied Ships
CA Vincennes
CA Wichita, Shell hits 1
CA Suffolk, Shell hits 2
DD Cony, Shell hits 1
DD Fullam, Shell hits 2
DD Lansdowne
DD Meade
DD Lang
DD Shaw, Shell hits 5, on fire
DD Perkins

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Ramree Island at 54,48

Allied Ships
BB Queen Elizabeth
BC Renown
DD Quiberon
DD Quickmatch
DD Nepal
DD Sims
DD Lardner

Japanese ground losses:
19 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Port hits 11
Port supply hits 4

BB Queen Elizabeth firing at 55th/B Division
BC Renown firing at Ramree Island
DD Quiberon firing at 41st Infantry Regiment
DD Quickmatch firing at 55th/B Division
DD Nepal firing at 55th/B Division
DD Sims firing at 55th/B Division
DD Lardner firing at Ramree Island


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Ramree Island at 54,48

Allied Ships
CA Frobisher
CA Shropshire
DD Quilliam
DD Queensborough
DD Petard
DD Penn
DD Thanet
DD Tenedos
DD Stronghold
DD Scout

Port hits 1
Port supply hits 1

CA Frobisher firing at 21st Ind.Mixed Brigade
CA Shropshire firing at Ramree Island
DD Quilliam firing at Ramree Island
DD Queensborough firing at 55th/B Division
DD Petard firing at Ramree Island
DD Penn firing at 55th/B Division
DD Thanet firing at Ramree Island
DD Tenedos firing at 55th/B Division
DD Stronghold firing at Ramree Island
DD Scout firing at Ramree Island


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Time Surface Combat, near Akyab at 54,46, Range 4,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CL Isuzu
DD Naganami
DD Asashio
DD Oshio
DD Minegumo
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Ayanami
CL Teshio

Allied Ships
MTB 275
MTB 276
MTB 277
MTB 278, Shell hits 1, and is sunk


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Time Surface Combat, near Sarmi at 91,114, Range 24,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
E Fuyo
E Karukaya, Shell hits 7, heavy fires, heavy damage
E Susuki
E Yanagi
E Kamo, Shell hits 15, and is sunk

Allied Ships
CA Vincennes
CA Wichita
CA Suffolk
DD Cony
DD Fullam
DD Lansdowne
DD Meade
DD Lang
DD Shaw
DD Perkins


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Time Surface Combat, near Akyab at 54,46, Range 6,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CL Isuzu, Shell hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
DD Naganami
DD Asashio
DD Oshio, Shell hits 2
DD Minegumo, Shell hits 1
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Ayanami, Shell hits 1
CL Teshio, Shell hits 2

Allied Ships
BB Queen Elizabeth, Shell hits 4
BC Renown
DD Lardner, Shell hits 4, heavy fires
DD Sims, Shell hits 1
DD Nepal
DD Quickmatch, Shell hits 1
DD Quiberon


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Biak at 88,111

Japanese Ships
DD Tachikaze, Torpedo hits 1, heavy damage
CL Kitakami
DD Yunagi
DD Oite
DD Kamikaze
DD Suruyame
DD Tatsukaze
DD Yukaze

Allied Ships
SS Golet

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Lomblen at 69,111

Japanese Ships
PB Syozui Maru, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
PB Ikuta Maru
PB Spey Maru
PB Tokyo Maru

Allied Ships
SS Silversides



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Sarmi at 91,114

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid detected at 40 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes

Japanese aircraft
P1Y1 Frances x 22
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar x 35
Ki-84r Frank x 23

Allied aircraft
Kittyhawk III x 5
Spitfire Vc Trop x 3
Kittyhawk III x 7
Kittyhawk IV x 5
P-38G Lightning x 6
P-40K Warhawk x 7
F4F-4 Wildcat x 2
FM-1 Wildcat x 14
F4U-1 Corsair x 11

Japanese aircraft losses
P1Y1 Frances: 3 damaged
P1Y1 Frances: 1 destroyed by flak
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar: 12 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Kittyhawk III: 1 destroyed
Kittyhawk III: 1 destroyed
Kittyhawk IV: 2 destroyed
FM-1 Wildcat: 1 destroyed

Allied Ships
LST-125, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
LST-170
LST-172
LST-72, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
LST-78, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
DE Dionne, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
LST-171, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Sarmi at 91,114

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid detected at 39 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes

Japanese aircraft
B6N2 Jill x 41
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar x 40
Ki-84r Frank x 34

Allied aircraft
Kittyhawk III x 5
Spitfire Vc Trop x 3
Kittyhawk III x 2
Kittyhawk IV x 1
P-38G Lightning x 5
P-39N1 Airacobra x 4
P-40K Warhawk x 6
FM-1 Wildcat x 11
F4U-1 Corsair x 9

Japanese aircraft losses
B6N2 Jill: 12 destroyed, 5 damaged
B6N2 Jill: 1 destroyed by flak
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar: 7 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Kittyhawk III: 1 destroyed
Spitfire Vc Trop: 1 destroyed
P-38G Lightning: 1 destroyed
P-39N1 Airacobra: 1 destroyed
P-40K Warhawk: 1 destroyed
FM-1 Wildcat: 1 destroyed
F4U-1 Corsair: 3 destroyed

Allied Ships
LST-167, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
LST-126, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
LST-170, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DE Doneff, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
LST-172, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Roti at 64,121

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid spotted at 17 NM, estimated altitude 38,400 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar x 30

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar: 16 destroyed
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar: 2 destroyed by flak

Allied Ships
APD Noa, Kamikaze hits 1
LST-478, Kamikaze hits 2, on fire
LCI-447, Kamikaze hits 1, and is sunk
LCI-446, Kamikaze hits 1, and is sunk

Allied ground losses:
532 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 19 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 5 destroyed, 9 disabled


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Broome at 61,120

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid detected at 49 NM, estimated altitude 38,400 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar x 3

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar: 2 destroyed

Allied Ships
xAP Kinta, Kamikaze hits 1, and is sunk
APA Barnett, Kamikaze hits 1

Allied ground losses:
519 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 9 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 17 destroyed, 11 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 7 (7 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Aircraft Attacking:
3 x Ki-43-IIIa Oscar flying as kamikaze
Kamikaze: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Sarmi (91,114)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 15070 troops, 125 guns, 38 vehicles, Assault Value = 474

Defending force 15369 troops, 206 guns, 197 vehicles, Assault Value = 451

Japanese ground losses:
48 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Allied ground losses:
10 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
39th Ind Engr Rgt /1
20th Ind Engineer Regiment
15th Division
44th Nav Gd /1
65th Construction Battalion
17th Army
67th Field AA Battalion
65th JNAF AF Unit

Defending units:
33rd Infantry Division
3rd USMC Tank Battalion
1/542nd Boat&Shore Engineer Battalion
XI US Corps
2/593rd Boat&Shore Engineer Battalion



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Ramree Island (54,48)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 14046 troops, 145 guns, 12 vehicles, Assault Value = 416

Defending force 14148 troops, 319 guns, 326 vehicles, Assault Value = 640

Japanese ground losses:
9 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
21st Ind.Mixed Brigade
41st Infantry Regiment
55th/B Division
5th Mortar Battalion

Defending units:
268th Motorised Brigade
23rd Indian Division
Provisionl Tank Bde /23


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Pantar (69,114)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 3007 troops, 30 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 170

Defending force 3198 troops, 22 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 71

Allied adjusted assault: 50

Japanese adjusted defense: 142

Allied assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 3)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), fatigue(-), morale(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
402 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 29 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Guns lost 10 (1 destroyed, 9 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
339 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 48 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
503rd Parachute Rgt /1
77th LRP Bde /1

Defending units:
15th Naval Guard Unit
55th JNAF AF Unit


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Wetar (72,114)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 364 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 20

Defending force 1407 troops, 19 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 52

Allied adjusted assault: 6

Japanese adjusted defense: 17

Allied assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), fatigue(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(-)

Japanese ground losses:
24 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
143 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 13 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
2/6 Commando Bn /1

Defending units:
32nd Nav Gsn Unit


User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: THE HEAD OF THE SNAKE

Post by GreyJoy »

Here's the situation....

At Sarmi i hoped to get his amphib TFs...same at Ramree...missed them on both occasions [:o]

Image
Attachments
Immagine.jpg
Immagine.jpg (244.49 KiB) Viewed 176 times
User avatar
paullus99
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2002 10:00 am

RE: THE HEAD OF THE SNAKE

Post by paullus99 »

Sorry to say Grey - I'm a big Allied Fanboy, so I hope you get your ass kicked, in the funnest & most enjoyable way possible......good luck though, you are going to need it.
Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...
User avatar
Cribtop
Posts: 3890
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 1:42 pm
Location: Lone Star Nation

RE: THE HEAD OF THE SNAKE

Post by Cribtop »

That does indeed look like the real deal. Good luck, GJ!
Image
User avatar
GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

RE: THE HEAD OF THE SNAKE

Post by GreyJoy »

:-) Thanks for your honesty Paullus [:D]

Thanks Crib!

Still waiting for Brad to send the turn... these are loooong turns as you can imagine. I've dedicated more than 6 hours to my last one [X(][X(][X(]

BTW, a little explanation of the previous turn is needed imho.


SARMI: I've decided not to be too passive there and try to keep him honest. I've seen coming another amphib TFs, along with the usual cruiser SAG that operates in those waters since Nov 1943.
My idea was to intercept the amphib TF with the fast DDs, and then engage the big allied boys with some torps, in order to let my air army do the dirty job in the upcoming morning... But, as u see, things went completely differently. His DDs (which are sooooo strong by now) created an impenetrable screen and we didn't score a single torp against the allied cruisers, missing completely the amphib TFs... amphib TFs that, nonetheless, were still there in the morning...along with the cruisers.... don't know why my bombers didn't aim at the juicy cruisers... misteries of war!

Same at Ramree... we completely miss (despite being in the same hexes for two times in the same night!) a HUGE TF containing APA/LST/LSI etc... then we engaged the BBs which were short on salvos... but, again, despite the close range, not a single torp was scored [:(]

However my losses are relatively light considering the circumstances. 3 DDs, 3 "E" and 1 CL... could have been worse.


Now Timor... to be honest I didn't expect that move, even if I considered it possible.... it makes sense however: if he manages to grab Roti and the islands between Timor and Java he'll have completely bypass my second defensive line and he'll have neutralized, without invading, the whole Timor defences (thus isolating 100k men!)

...I'm scared to death for the upcoming battle...
veji1
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 5:28 pm

RE: THE HEAD OF THE SNAKE

Post by veji1 »

Good luck. I hope you have masses of planes, kamis, bombers, ablative escorts, quality fighters for LRCAP, etc... You need numbers big big numbers
Adieu Ô Dieu odieux... signé Adam
User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2617
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

RE: THE HEAD OF THE SNAKE

Post by CaptBeefheart »

Hammer time.

Cheers,
CC
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
MrBlizzard
Posts: 636
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:34 pm
Location: Italy

RE: THE HEAD OF THE SNAKE

Post by MrBlizzard »

They're coming!!! The mother of all the battles is beginning!!
These targets are a little surprising indeed, no big bases for 4E??...
Good luck GJ [:)]
Blizzard
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: THE HEAD OF THE SNAKE

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy

:-) Thanks for your honesty Paullus [:D]

Thanks Crib!

Still waiting for Brad to send the turn... these are loooong turns as you can imagine. I've dedicated more than 6 hours to my last one [X(][X(][X(]

BTW, a little explanation of the previous turn is needed imho.


SARMI: I've decided not to be too passive there and try to keep him honest. I've seen coming another amphib TFs, along with the usual cruiser SAG that operates in those waters since Nov 1943.
My idea was to intercept the amphib TF with the fast DDs, and then engage the big allied boys with some torps, in order to let my air army do the dirty job in the upcoming morning... But, as u see, things went completely differently. His DDs (which are sooooo strong by now) created an impenetrable screen and we didn't score a single torp against the allied cruisers, missing completely the amphib TFs... amphib TFs that, nonetheless, were still there in the morning...along with the cruisers.... don't know why my bombers didn't aim at the juicy cruisers... misteries of war!

Same at Ramree... we completely miss (despite being in the same hexes for two times in the same night!) a HUGE TF containing APA/LST/LSI etc... then we engaged the BBs which were short on salvos... but, again, despite the close range, not a single torp was scored [:(]

However my losses are relatively light considering the circumstances. 3 DDs, 3 "E" and 1 CL... could have been worse.


Now Timor... to be honest I didn't expect that move, even if I considered it possible.... it makes sense however: if he manages to grab Roti and the islands between Timor and Java he'll have completely bypass my second defensive line and he'll have neutralized, without invading, the whole Timor defences (thus isolating 100k men!)

...I'm scared to death for the upcoming battle...

Time and again I've faced the same situation. It's so tough against the Allies in 44 with all of those Fletchers and Clevelands plus the APA/AKA/LST amphibs. The window is small and well barred.

Even when I've had strikes make it through the LR CAP to the CL/DD their flak puts up a wall by this time in the war and that combined with their speed makes them tough to hit.

Not sure why he sent out the multiple TFs in the DEI without air protection?? The CVEs are 200 miles from the amphibs? Why? Glad you at least had something on to take advantage because it seems from the spectator view that it was simply poor play unless something was set that didn't happen. It does make me feel like there will be holes you can exploit in the next few days though.


"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: THE HEAD OF THE SNAKE

Post by JocMeister »

A bit surprised by his choice of targets. That really sticking the head into the hornets nest. [X(] Gutsy move and to be honest I´m not sure its a good one. With the KB in the area I think you have a good shot at slapping him around a bit. Perhaps even stopping him. I think he should have stayed within his own LBA. Now his CVs need to cover themselves, the amphibs and all the various SCTFs. Also don´t understand why he hasn´t any air cover over his Amphibs? And why is he scattered like that? [&:] I think it looks really odd to be honest. Why does he have the Amphibs in the forefront completely unguarded like that? And the CVs all the way back on the OZ coast?

EDIT: Erik beat me to it! [:D]
Image
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”