Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1126b updated 17 Sept 2016

Post bug reports and ask for help with other issues here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
KenchiSulla
Posts: 2956
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: the Netherlands

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by KenchiSulla »

Hi Michael,

Great work on the beta!

We are using the q version of your beta in a PBEM. My interpretation of the notes was that it should not be possible for units with a garrison component in the TOE to retreat (regardless of it containing an actual squad)

I noticed that garrison units from Calcutta can now be moved freely due to the fact that the garrison component got destroyed in combat..



Image
Attachments
Garrisonu..mcombat.jpg
Garrisonu..mcombat.jpg (109.01 KiB) Viewed 339 times
AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by michaelm75au »

Static devices should not allow unit to move. However, once all the devices were killed off, the code no longer saw it as static.
This is not how it should have worked as originally designed. In reality it should have looked at the TOE complement to determine if it was static, and then it would not matter if all the devices were killed off.
So rather than 'break' existing games by suddenly freezing units in place, I decided to go back to what this really meant by checking the TOE for static squad/engineer devices only.
The current set of static devices like the 'Garrison unit' have generally been defined as type 'Army weapon'. If this was changed to 'Squad', then it wont allow the unit to move or retreat. [I have not fully tested this yet due to other commitments.]
Michael
User avatar
KenchiSulla
Posts: 2956
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: the Netherlands

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by KenchiSulla »

Hi Michael,

Thanks for the explanation. For now I'll just approach my opponent about the issue.

Cheers,
AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
User avatar
koniu
Posts: 2763
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:19 pm
Location: Konin, Poland, European Union

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by koniu »

Can someone will explain how impact this fix will have for game
18/07/2013: 1123n - Correct retreat test in supply phase for isolated units

In last turn of my PBEM Allies capture Ramree Island (dot base). But they not force me to surrender. After combat remnants of 21 ID retreat to jungle in hex.

In supply phase i get that massage
"Japanese Unit(s) surrounded at Ramree Island" and unit disappear

I am worried that this will impact ground combat in places like islands.
Very often defender after losing base retreat to jungle and was still able to fight or at lest to buy some time. I hope that those units will not disappear only because they are surrounded and AF/port in in enemy hands.


"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by michaelm75au »

ORIGINAL: koniu

Can someone will explain how impact this fix will have for game
18/07/2013: 1123n - Correct retreat test in supply phase for isolated units

In last turn of my PBEM Allies capture Ramree Island (dot base). But they not force me to surrender. After combat remnants of 21 ID retreat to jungle in hex.

In supply phase i get that massage
"Japanese Unit(s) surrounded at Ramree Island" and unit disappear

I am worried that this will impact ground combat in places like islands.
Very often defender after losing base retreat to jungle and was still able to fight or at lest to buy some time. I hope that those units will not disappear only because they are surrounded and AF/port in in enemy hands.
The fix mentioned was around units being forced to retreat when only a check was being performed. The message you are seeing is normal attrition and not to do with the mentioned patch.
Michael
miv792
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by miv792 »

The patch is lacking in editing features to the game play is not hung.
Sorry for my english use translate.google.
Sorry for my english
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10457
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: miv79

The patch is lacking in editing features to the game play is not hung.
Sorry for my english use translate.google.
Try again. Not quite getting it. Also try your language, quite a few linguists in this forum.

niye bitno da neznas ingles ovdje ...
Pax
User avatar
viberpol
Posts: 858
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 3:16 pm
Location: Global village, Poland, EU

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by viberpol »

Proposition of an improvement...

Michael, is it possible to add a single click functionality "Activate all delayed"?

Explanation:
Pilots transferred manually come with random delay. That delay varies and counts down till 1.
Then "delay: 1" pilots will not automatically switch becoming active and taking part in the action. Player needs to click them to "activate". [At least this is my understanding].
I found myself clicking my life to bring thousands of those transferred pilots to active duty. [:D]
Such an improvement shall make the players' WITPAE virtual life a little bit easier... [;)]

Image
Attachments
Bez tytu?u.jpg
Bez tytu?u.jpg (164.68 KiB) Viewed 339 times
Przy lackim orle, przy koniu Kiejstuta Archanioł Rusi na proporcach błysł
User avatar
viberpol
Posts: 858
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 3:16 pm
Location: Global village, Poland, EU

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by viberpol »

or
... that click can be made more "global" somewhere on the panel view of all "Show groups".

Image
Attachments
Bez tytu?u.jpg
Bez tytu?u.jpg (178.43 KiB) Viewed 339 times
Przy lackim orle, przy koniu Kiejstuta Archanioł Rusi na proporcach błysł
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: viberpol
Proposition of an improvement...

Michael, is it possible to add a single click functionality "Activate all delayed"?

+1!!!!! I would love that. One of the most annoying things in the game right now!
Image
User avatar
khyberbill
Posts: 1941
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: new milford, ct

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by khyberbill »

That would be a nice feature.
"Its a dog eat dog world Sammy and I am wearing Milkbone underwear" -Norm.
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5450
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by Yaab »

And "Return all to pool" for PTs, LCMs, LCIs, LCCs, LSMs, LLOs, LLBs...
User avatar
rjopel
Posts: 619
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:32 pm
Location: Charlottesville, VA, USA

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by rjopel »

ORIGINAL: Yaab

And "Return all to pool" for PTs, LCMs, LCIs, LCCs, LSMs, LLOs, LLBs...


This would be great. What a pain this can be with 100 or so at a base.
Ryan Opel
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by rook749 »

ORIGINAL: viberpol

Proposition of an improvement...

Michael, is it possible to add a single click functionality "Activate all delayed"?

+1

---Rook749
User avatar
Kull
Posts: 2744
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: El Paso, TX

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by Kull »

ORIGINAL: viberpol

Explanation:
Pilots transferred manually come with random delay. That delay varies and counts down till 1.


Not necessarily
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by michaelm75au »

If a group needs a pilot, it will grab one of '1'-delayed pilots if no other available in the group. If I make them all active, at the end of the next turn, it will spend time putting them back to '1' if the group has too many pilots.
I often swap out a fatigued pilot with one of the '1'-delayed guys in order to rest him.

Whats the main reason for wanting them to appear in the group all the time?
Michael
Banzan
Posts: 287
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 1:28 pm
Location: Bremen, Germany

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by Banzan »

ORIGINAL: michaelm

If a group needs a pilot, it will grab one of '1'-delayed pilots if no other available in the group.

Does training count as "needs"? I often build training groups of all those 50-60 skill pilots automaticly added to groups, but i am pretty sure they never came active without "clicking" them.
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by michaelm75au »

Training doesn't specifically fill the group, but I was thinking about it. Prefer that than adding an additional button in several places[:D]
Michael
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10457
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by PaxMondo »

Michael,
I agree with you. I would not want them automatically added all the time. I routinely put pilots to rest so they won't fly a mission for a few days. I don't want them active. However, for training, having all them active would be ok.

Catch is when the group is only 30% training, I wouldn't want them to join in. Only at 100%.
Pax
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123r update

Post by rook749 »

I would agree by default, if I set a pilot to inactive he should stay inactive with the delay of 1 day until I change the state. However, I love the idea of a button to set all inactive pilots to active, this would help speed the game along.

Rook749
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”