Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderator: MOD_Command

User avatar
CapnDarwin
Posts: 9719
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Newark, OH
Contact:

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by CapnDarwin »

Very nice test of capabilities. The only thing that I see that would add to the realism is targeting the MIRVs before launch within the path of flight. Still very cool.

+1 to the Dev team!
OTS is looking forward to Southern Storm getting released!

Cap'n Darwin aka Jim Snyder
On Target Simulations LTD
User avatar
JRyan
Posts: 505
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 4:29 am
Contact:

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by JRyan »

The possibilities are endless....Thanks for doing this indeed.
But By Grace Go I.......
amatteucci
Posts: 386
Joined: Sun May 14, 2000 8:00 am
Location: ITALY

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by amatteucci »

I just setup a quick 1983 war scare scenario (only ICBMs and EW radars). Tried to launch a massive soviet attack on US ICBM fields but the PC slowed to a crawl (OK I didn't expect it to actually manage hundreds of MIRVed missiles speeding towards their targets, I just did it for fun).

Anyway I was still wondering about the possibility to simulate, in principle, such a strike with Command. I noticed that missile silos have, more or less, all the same stats (special armor, ca. 4000 DP) from the early '60s filmsy models to the super hardened late '80s ones. I don't know how nuclear explosions are modelled in the game but it seems they are pretty capable to obliterate everything inside their blast radius, regardless of the overpressure those structures are meant to be able to resist to.
User avatar
acbennett3
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 6:43 am
Location: Montana

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by acbennett3 »

I suspected a full scale nuclear exchange could potentially cause a real performance hit on the computer. Just curious, how many missiles/MIRVs/targets did you setup? Can you save the scenario and upload so I can play with it? What are your computers specs?

On the subject of cities, I was thinking with the editor you could set up classes of cities (small/medium/large) populated by numerous facilities. Then export these 'template' cities out and use them to build scenarios of varying numbers and mixes of cities in different countries. You could even incorporate defenses (SAM, Interceptors, etc) for them based on certain time periods, nations, weapons. Then the scenario would be setting up a specific country/time period/region and the player has strategic assets (ICBMs, SLBMs, bombers, Cruise missiles, even CVBGs with nuclear armed A/C) and has to assign them targets to best penetrate the defenses and destroy the targets.

Just rambling here - but first I need to spend time learning and exploring the editor.
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
Santayana
amatteucci
Posts: 386
Joined: Sun May 14, 2000 8:00 am
Location: ITALY

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by amatteucci »

Here you go. Consider that this is not actually a scenario, it's just a map upload of the various ICBM bases so I could test fire missiles all around the globe...
Attachments
Test.zip
(372.27 KiB) Downloaded 50 times
User avatar
acbennett3
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 6:43 am
Location: Montana

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by acbennett3 »

Thanks will try tonight.

Just stated playing with the import/export units function of the editor and found all the pre-built unit groups included with the game - including US ICBM forces amongst many other things. This is just the tip of the iceberg - there are all sorts of pre-built bases and weapons complexes broken down by country and even time periods. Looks like the Devs have already anticipated this line of thinking.

Look under \Command Modern Air Naval Operations\ImportExport to view.

This simulation (calling it a game is long past) continues to amaze...
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
Santayana
User avatar
Grim.Reaper
Posts: 1337
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:08 pm

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by Grim.Reaper »

Thanks for sharing your tests...helped me make the decision to purchase!
User avatar
acbennett3
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 6:43 am
Location: Montana

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by acbennett3 »

In the below image I used the pre-built unit/group file for Grand Forks AFB. It has an ICBM farm of 150 Minuteman III silos.
I placed 2 Delta III's off the Pacific coast and did a full launch - 16 SLBMs x2 SSBNs x3 MIRV each = 96 re-entry vehicles.
At this point in the launch the first warheads are about to detonate, and most of the remaining missiles have MIRVed.
My i7/3.4GHz processor has been running at approx. 30% utilization total. Makes me wonder if my computer would blowup trying to simulate a full nuclear exchange.

Grim.Reaper - I am sure you won't regret it - it is just going to get better...

More to come...

Image
Attachments
07_01Gran..eforedet.jpg
07_01Gran..eforedet.jpg (105.25 KiB) Viewed 596 times
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
Santayana
User avatar
acbennett3
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 6:43 am
Location: Montana

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by acbennett3 »

And here is the image as the last of the RV's impact. In the end only 22 Missile silos were destroyed after 96 RVs impacted.
In the log I saw a number of reports of misses (impact not close enough to the silo) and warhead malfunctions.
Next I will restart the scenario at right before the first impacts and try to launch all the Minuteman III ICBMs.
I'll have fire extinguisher for my computer nearby.

For now - real life is intruding...


Image
Attachments
07_02Gran..lastones.jpg
07_02Gran..lastones.jpg (36.24 KiB) Viewed 592 times
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
Santayana
User avatar
JRyan
Posts: 505
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 4:29 am
Contact:

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by JRyan »

I too have been playing around and took a B-2 with Nucs and attacked some North Korean bases. The nukes killed the base but also killed the B2. I was using a mission to accomplish this so I think there might be an issue with the AI with Nuc Bomb drops, I am not sure.
But By Grace Go I.......
Rob322
Posts: 620
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 8:53 pm

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by Rob322 »

What's the widest spread for MIRVs have you seen? 100 miles, 300?
RoryAndersonCDT
Posts: 1828
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:45 pm

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by RoryAndersonCDT »

This is my favorite thread in the whole world.
Command Dev Team
Technical Lead
User avatar
acbennett3
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 6:43 am
Location: Montana

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by acbennett3 »

JRyan - I saw the same thing with my B-52 run over Cuba. Maybe need to look at the yield of the weapon vs. the speed by which the bomber can egress from the target.
I plan on trying a B-36 Peacemaker attack on a large defended Soviet city next and will see what happens.

Below is the image of the US Minuteman III full launch while the Soviet RV's are raining down. This definitely slowed things down - 90 Soviet RV's and 100-140 Minuteman III launches at the same time.
1 Sec in the game was taking 4-5secs of realtime to process. But it was still chugging along...

Image
Attachments
07_03Gran..erLaunch.jpg
07_03Gran..erLaunch.jpg (62.65 KiB) Viewed 592 times
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
Santayana
K 19
Posts: 130
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:10 am

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by K 19 »

Joshua: Shall we play a game?
David Lightman: Oh!
Jennifer: [giggles] I think it missed him.
David Lightman: Yeah. Weird isn't it?
Jennifer: Yeah.
David Lightman: [typing] Love to. How about Global Thermonuclear War?
Joshua: Wouldn't you prefer a nice game of chess?
[Jennifer laughs]
David Lightman: [typing] Later. Let's play Global Thermonuclear War.
Joshua: Fine.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

David Lightman: [typing] Is this a game... or is it real?
Joshua: What's the difference?
David Lightman: [muttering] Oh wow.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Great thread, acb3. [:)]
User avatar
acbennett3
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 6:43 am
Location: Montana

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by acbennett3 »

K19 - exactly the movie I was thinking of in the last few posts when my computer was dragging tracking 100's of nukes.
I need a WOPR...
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
Santayana
User avatar
Primarchx
Posts: 1954
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:29 pm

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by Primarchx »

I knew this would happen...

[Waits patiently for triad-oriented SIOP scenarios to appear]
User avatar
acbennett3
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 6:43 am
Location: Montana

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by acbennett3 »

I'm actually playing around w/an early 50's scenario with B-36 Peacemakers launching a strike on the Kola Peninsula from Thule AFB Greenland. Going to see how outdated the B-36 became with the introduction of the Mig-15. First test was not pretty. Now I know why they were playing around with hanging the XF-85 Goblin or F-84 off a bomber for these long range missions.

That would be 1 leg of the triad - more to come...
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
Santayana
User avatar
ultradave
Posts: 1646
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 7:01 pm
Location: Rhode Island, USA

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by ultradave »

Nice report. Amazing what can be done. The more I see and play, the more it's obvious that while this looks like updated Harpoon, there is WAAAY more under the hood.
----------------
Dave A.
"When the Boogeyman goes to sleep he checks his closet for paratroopers"
User avatar
JRyan
Posts: 505
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 4:29 am
Contact:

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by JRyan »

ORIGINAL: ultradave

there is WAAAY more under the hood.

Bingo![&o]
But By Grace Go I.......
amatteucci
Posts: 386
Joined: Sun May 14, 2000 8:00 am
Location: ITALY

RE: Strategic Nuclear Warfare

Post by amatteucci »

ORIGINAL: acb3

I'm actually playing around w/an early 50's scenario with B-36 Peacemakers launching a strike on the Kola Peninsula from Thule AFB Greenland. Going to see how outdated the B-36 became with the introduction of the Mig-15. First test was not pretty. Now I know why they were playing around with hanging the XF-85 Goblin or F-84 off a bomber for these long range missions.
Curiosly enough, I was recently trying to model B-36 raids into the Kola pensinsula too!
Had some problems escaping the blast wave of the bigger bombs [:D] (i.e. the fifteen megatonners Mark 17 and Mark 24)

Speaking about the MiG-15 vs B-36 issue, I do think that the ceilings capped at 40,000ft further exacerbate the defender's disadvantage.
In mock combats F-86 Sabres had a difficult time in reaching B-36s flying at 55,000ft. The bomber just had to engage into a banking turn to let the pursuing Sabre just stall. Of course it's known that the MiG-15 had a higher ceiling than the F-86 but I doubt it'd had been that effective over 50,000ft.

P.S. The number of systems included in the database and of situations that are, in principle, replicable with this game, blows my mind! I never thought there would be a game that would have let me intercept soviet bombers over Alaska with F-89s firing Mighty Mouse rockets! [X(]
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”