SIM HQ Review

[adek670]

Guys,

There was a critical review earlier on Sim HQ that has been pulled. Reference in the link below:

Sim HQ Forum - CMANO

Whilst I'm not from the 'land of the free', I'm sure that freedom of the press exists in most western democracies and I would like to make my own mind up as to its worth.

At present, I'm struggling with the game. So much requires fixing to make it anything like a finished product.

This feels like the time I bought a new car and it broke down 3 miles from the garage forecourt. I then had 2 months of Vauxhall having it in and out of the garage - with each visit a further issue then occurred... Feels like de ja vu.. or have I said that already somewhere else.

Reaper

[RoryAndersonCDT]

My understanding is that SimHQ chose the person who had the most against the developers to review the game. Basically some decade old drama; long before my time.

The freedom of the press is freedom from government intervention. The press is allowed to do whatever they want otherwise.

[thewood1]

I think this was a credibility issue for SimHQ. Several people, not related to Matrix sent emails explaining that Herman not had a decades-long feud with the developers and even had a somewhat competitive product in his PlayersDB version of Harpoon.

If some kind of disclosure had been put up, I am not sure anyone would have had as much of a problem. In the end it made both Herman and SimHq look a little foolish, no matter how fair the review was.

btw, freedom of the press only relates to government infringement. Companies and other organizations have a lot of leeway in what they put up with.

[adek670]

yeah I know-- just exercising some license - more of an objection to it been pulled than a campaign against government censorship!!!

just frustrated that my new car is back in the garage.

[tombo]

I read the "Review" before it was pulled. Once i filtered out the talk stuff ,I thought he had some reasonable points. Some points are what i thought as i followed thru the AARs. I think the points made by the Review should be summarized again and addressed by the Devs.

We all want this product to succeed and be its best.

just my 2C.

[JRyan]

Guys...having HH do the review is like asking Obama to do a review of the House plan for Obummer Care....that was the LAST person that would provide a non agenda driven review. Sure the Sim has some issues and they are being addressed.

In a way, HH KILLED Harpoon........

Did it have some concerns? Yes sure and so do we and the Devs are addressing them as they can.

Here is just one example of bias....HH complained about the Formation Editor and how it was not as good as such and such. Well he failed to mention that the capability is there just not implemented in the same way as Harpoon. This was done to give what the developers thought was more flexible. Ol HH failed to even mention this..

I about puked when I read it.....for those of you who don't know, please follow Erik's links and read what happened...I was there and I left for 4 years.....

IBTL...

[adek670]

yeah,

read that in the link

sounds like a loaded review for sure .. but I still think I would like to read it

[ExMachina]

I'm all for personal opinions, but that SimHQ review was more of a personal vindetta--I only recently learned of how the reviewer had not only personal issues with some of hte Command team, but also how he had a competing interest in the market.

I have to give credit too: the Command devs have handled Herman's review better that Herman handled it

[JRyan]

ORIGINAL: ExMachina
I have to give credit too: the Command devs have handled Herman's review better that Herman handled it

It's called being classy.......

[Empty014]

I personally thought the review was fair and factual, regardless of whatever history is there. At the end of the day the released game is a very bug ridden product, you only have to look at the page after page of problems in this forum. Why should we be expected to accept such a product, I ask you, would you buy a new car with no glass in the windows or the brakes not fitted. I have not been able to finish a scenario or tutorial without it crashing or freezing.

[mikmykWS]

Hi Mick

What issues are you experiencing? Please post details and we'll gladly follow up.

Thanks!

Mike

[ExMachina]

At the end of the day the released game is a very bug ridden product, you only have to look at the page after page of problems in this forum.

Honestly, this is one of the most bug-free PC games I've ever purchased--for a v1.00 it's remarkably stable.

[strykerpsg]

ORIGINAL: mickt014

I personally thought the review was fair and factual, regardless of whatever history is there. At the end of the day the released game is a very bug ridden product, you only have to look at the page after page of problems in this forum. Why should we be expected to accept such a product, I ask you, would you buy a new car with no glass in the windows or the brakes not fitted. I have not been able to finish a scenario or tutorial without it crashing or freezing.

I'm not certain you're playing the same version as everyone else. I've had an occasional glitch but nothing of show stopper proportions.

[MaB1708]

The "page after page of problems in this forum" are often not problems but wishes for enhancements etc. Has nothing to do with the product, which, as ExMachina and others stated for good reason, is in good shape for a 1.0 - with the devs committed and present, what more can we expect?
The tons of posts IMHO result mainly from the fact that people playing these kind of sims are very detail-driven, a sim representation that is "somehow" resembling real-life is not enough, we want more and we ideally would like to have anything as accurate as real life. No one will give sth like this to us but we judge a sim on the level of granularity and how close it comes to what we - individually - consider "the real thing".
COMMAND is wonderfull and very close, and all reasonable requests me and the other anancastic personalities around would like to see I believe we will see.
A success story has started with the first release and we are part of it - great. There are issues - yes. But please please lets keep the tone here civil and don't get affected by the poison spilling of others with their personal agenda (which I am not judging, I just want it to stay out of here).
All the best,
M

[Hertston]

ORIGINAL: Reaper

sounds like a loaded review for sure .. but I still think I would like to read it

So would I, for entertainment value, but they were right to pull it. Command will get little mainstream attention so reviews at places like Sim HQ are very important - commercially important - to WarFare Sims and Slitherene/Matrix. I'm all in favour of 'freedom of speech', but it just isn't acceptable to hand something that needs to independent and unbiased over to someone who is not only neither, but seems to have a vendetta against the developers that Vito Corleone would be proud of.

Whatever the rights and wrongs of the feud giving one side a free ticket to financially damage the other, with not insignificant collateral damage to the hobby itself - is unacceptable.

[thewood1]

I'll point out again that Herman's PlayersDB is in some ways a competitive product. Would you ask a chevy dealer for a review of a Toyota and publish it. SimHQ has gotten itself into a tough spot just because they did no due diligence. Now it can be perceived that they pulled the review for commercial reasons. I don't think anyone with half a brain and knows even a little of the story thinks that. But it does give the fringe element a rallying point.

[mjk428]

It concerns me that SimHQ could be pressured by a game publisher into pulling a review. Their credibility as an independent actor just went out the window. Even if the reviewer had an axe to grind once the review was published they should have backed up their reviewer.

I read the review and I thought the reviewer was at least trying to be fair. Now that it's been pulled it will appear that it was much worse than it really was. Personally I'd rather read reviews from people with a chip on their shoulder than from somebody enamored with a game or its publisher. The press should be skeptical.

All in all the review pointed out many areas where CMANO needs improvement. Nowhere did I see any serious misrepresentations of the game. I hope the devs kept a copy of the review because it made some good recommendations.

[thewood1]

It has nothing to do with the review itself, but the credibility of the reviewer. A reader should have been made aware that the author has developed his own H3 database that he pushes as an alternative to both H3 and Command.

I am not sure matrix even advertises on SimHQ. In fact, SimHQ has gone without updates for months at a time. Even its ads are months out of date.

[ExMachina]

Personally I'd rather read reviews from people with a chip on their shoulder than from somebody enamored with a game or its publisher

But either way, I'd want to be made of aware of those biases, and especially of any conflicts of interest. Since the writer is essentially a direct competitor to Command, that conflict of interest needed to be clearly divulged in the article.

[mattpenfold]

ORIGINAL: mjk428

It concerns me that SimHQ could be pressured by a game publisher into pulling a review. Their credibility as an independent actor just went out the window. Even if the reviewer had an axe to grind once the review was published they should have backed up their reviewer.

I read the review and I thought the reviewer was at least trying to be fair. Now that it's been pulled it will appear that it was much worse than it really was. Personally I'd rather read reviews from people with a chip on their shoulder than from somebody enamored with a game or its publisher. The press should be skeptical.

All in all the review pointed out many areas where CMANO needs improvement. Nowhere did I see any serious misrepresentations of the game. I hope the devs kept a copy of the review because it made some good recommendations.

So you don't think posting a review by a person who is known to have a personal animus with the people behind Command, and failing to declare that damaged their credibility in the first place ?