ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon
I feel I can offer the most resistance against the superior Allied forces if I do so rather than waste so many resources in combat in 42. My planes pools are kept low and I don't feel I've wasted too much HI on early aircraft.
You are absolutely correct of course, and this is what the Allied player can never allow. He gonna lose China AND allow you slack time to accumulate resources in '42. Both of these are tickets to a bad ride in 43/44 for the allies.
Watch Erik's AAR carefully. He's doing well, but you should be able to see better now the danger of Burma/SE Asia in the late game. I hate that whole area in '44. Start to consider now your withdrawals paths and your MLR in China. Get those requisite bases staffed now and start improving their infrastructure so that you have what you need when you need it. You have plenty of time, so any unit with even 12xEng squads will work.
Your exit paths will depend greatly upon whether you hold Kunming or not, but the overall danger of allied landings to cut you off still exists.
Singapore
Singers is always a great debate with me. Yes, the allies badly need this repair yard to sustain fleet op's. It is the only one to take BB's short of Cape Town or PH. A VERY BIG deal. The problem is the east coast ... You can make KL/Malacca/JB/ Singers a nice 4 base defensive zone that could put up a good fight. It takes a lot to neutralize 4 bases simultaneously and the allies will struggle to pull that together until '45 unless they commit their Death Star. That is what you want of course, Death Start against LBA where you have a good chance to inflict damage. All very good.
Then you look at Mersing. The reverse Mersing works just as well for the allies as it does for the IJ. You can't get there in 3 days unless you use armored units due to the terrain. That means you have to be prepared to lose a VERY expensive unit (Armor Div) defending Singers. Since you can't get there in 3 days without it, the allies can cut KL/Mal from JB/Singers and then you lose pretty quick.
So to me, this means I cannot mount a very effective defense there. Maybe I hold out 4 weeks, maybe. And whatever units I commit are gone, I have to plan total rebuilds. So 100K HI per ID ... 6 ID equivalents min, or 600K HI to delay the allies 4 weeks ... maybe. That's pretty pricey ... I could build +15,000 1E planes for that. Not sure I would take the expense.
Now if I invest the Armor Div, I only get 3 so this is a big deal, how long can I hold Singers? Not sure. But if I can repulse the Mersing landing just once, I will assuredly cost the allies at least 2 ID's, and likely 3ID equivalents. Plus, with Kami's I should be able to hit a lot of high value ships. If I put 1 Armored Div plus 12 ID's and support, could I hold the penninsula for 6 months in '44? I doubt it. And in the end, that is a lot to lose ...
If Mersing and Kuantan were RR connected, you could make a really strong defense. They aren't. And the two of them just negate any real defense of Singers. JB/Singers is just not strong enough, too easy to negate a 2 base defense.
Just some rambling thoughts ... use as you see fit.