Design a better LCS

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

User avatar
Mgellis
Posts: 2435
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:45 pm
Contact:

Design a better LCS

Post by Mgellis »


Okay, I keep hearing gloom and doom about the LCS, although it sounds like its real sin is not so much what it is but that for what it costs it should be more.

So, we've got a 3,000-ton ship with 1 57-mm. cannon, 1 21-missile RAM launcher, and two modular slots are big enough for about a automobile-sized pod with ton-and-a-half of weapons. The standard weapon looks like it will be a pod with a 30-mm. cannon.

Everything is relative. Certainly, the LCS is under-armed compared to other 3,000-ton ships. On the other hand, if I was a patrol boat with a couple of machine guns, I wouldn't want to meet an LCS when its captain was in a bad mood.

If you were going to replace some or all of those four weapon systems with EXISTING weapons, and had to pick weapon systems of roughly the same size, so they will fit on the ship...what would you choose?

I'm wondering what else would fit in those modules. It looks like it's only about two meters tall, which limits what it could do as a VLS. Any ideas?

Maybe keep the two 30 mm. guns, but replace the 57 mm gun with missiles? What would fit? What would make sense?

RoryAndersonCDT
Posts: 1828
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:45 pm

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by RoryAndersonCDT »

I wouldn't mind a MLRS's launcher pod at the back. [:D]

Image

Also how about a whole pile of inflatable boats filled with SEALs?

How about the planned F-35 laser system? That would be small and light.

Command Dev Team
Technical Lead
ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by ComDev »

So guys,

How about dumping the LCS onto the map in Command, arm it with the weapons and sensors you think it should have, and post up a screenshot here [8D]

Or even better, a video with your LCS Mod in action [X(]
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
smudge56
Posts: 667
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:31 am
Location: UK

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by smudge56 »

Dumb question LCS [&:]
AKA - Smudge
RoryAndersonCDT
Posts: 1828
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:45 pm

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by RoryAndersonCDT »

Littoral Combat Ship; it describes 2 classes of American corvette size ships. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Littoral_combat_ship
Command Dev Team
Technical Lead
smudge56
Posts: 667
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:31 am
Location: UK

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by smudge56 »

Cheers mate never heard of that. I spend a lot of time trying to cypher acronyms out lol.
AKA - Smudge
User avatar
hellfish6
Posts: 695
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 2:09 am

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by hellfish6 »

From what I've been able to dig up on the ASW mission package, it actually doesn't sound all that bad (though it's still very preliminary). It's also not any better than what any other ASW-capable surface ship in the US Navy can do right now, and doesn't include torpedoes or ASROC. The MH-60R is the only offensive weapon the ship has for ASW.
User avatar
CV60
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:40 pm

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by CV60 »

For anyone that is interested, go to
http://cdrsalamander.blogspot.com/
and check out some of his postings on the LCS over the past 8 years or so. Especially read the comments by the contributors.
“Do I not destroy my enemies when I make them my friends?” -Abraham Lincoln
RoryAndersonCDT
Posts: 1828
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:45 pm

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by RoryAndersonCDT »

For when 57mm just isn't enough!

Image
Image
Image
Command Dev Team
Technical Lead
User avatar
jdkbph
Posts: 255
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:43 pm
Location: CT, USA

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by jdkbph »

Harpoons in box launchers would probably be the quickest way to add ASuW capability. Sure they're old and being phased out but they require no heavy duty physical integration into the deign and they would provide enough kick to take on most ships in it's weight class. Replace them with LRASM when they come on line.

For AAW...? I have no idea. Point defense is probably the best they can do with it at this point. Does that mean more RAM or something like it? I'm not seeing any way to squeeze ESSM into it without major modifications.

I wonder if there's any way to utilize those big side loading mission bays for an NQVLS (Not Quite Vertical Launch System)? [:)]

JD
JD
RoryAndersonCDT
Posts: 1828
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:45 pm

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by RoryAndersonCDT »

Speaking of Harpoons... LCS vs Kirov!!!



Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Command Dev Team
Technical Lead
User avatar
jdkbph
Posts: 255
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:43 pm
Location: CT, USA

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by jdkbph »

Youch. Not quite what I would have expected.

JD
JD
RoryAndersonCDT
Posts: 1828
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:45 pm

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by RoryAndersonCDT »

I did cheat a little on that engagement, the Kirov is the 1980s version and the Harpoons were from 1999. [:D]
Command Dev Team
Technical Lead
User avatar
Agathosdaimon
Posts: 1051
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 2:42 am

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by Agathosdaimon »

You can seriously put a land combat vehicle on an lcs and have it fire on enemies too, thats kind of pretty funny to see, one could make some funny scenarios with this game too i see.
smudge56
Posts: 667
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:31 am
Location: UK

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by smudge56 »

Excellent for close combat. Lol [:D]
AKA - Smudge
User avatar
mrfeizhu
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 5:24 am

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by mrfeizhu »

LCS ship may make into Conway's edition of worlds worst warships. Part of the problem is there is not much room for expansion and the crew size is small. The Spruance Class when they first came out, were under gunned for their size, two 5 inch guns and an asroc launcher and 2 helicopters. But the vertical launchers made the ship into a powerful weapons system, but they had a lot of room. Maybe putting a tank on is not a bad idea, it may be safer to be in the than inside the ship.
Old man sort of living in China for the last 18 years
User avatar
Agathosdaimon
Posts: 1051
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 2:42 am

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by Agathosdaimon »

with enough LCS craft one could recreate the whole battle of 73 Easting just south of the Galapagos Islands!
ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by ComDev »

Bump [:D]
 
Scenarios, anyone?
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
User avatar
SSN754planker
Posts: 448
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 5:48 pm

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by SSN754planker »

Baloogan...the pic of the tank on the back of the LCS made me spit cola all over my keyboard...
MY BOOK LIST
ST1/SS SSN 754
RoryAndersonCDT
Posts: 1828
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:45 pm

RE: Design a better LCS

Post by RoryAndersonCDT »

Littoral Combat Submarine
Image
Command Dev Team
Technical Lead
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”