Pacific War Diary: RA 6.0 Dai Nippon

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Sangeli
Posts: 1132
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

RE: China Line

Post by Sangeli »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Sherwood and I have frozen in our match due to some, I shall delicately state, petulance. It was his understanding that we would have a 'quiet' China and that is exactly what I want, however, he became quite (ahhhhhhhhhh) disconcerted when he saw me move in taking all the territory he was vacating.
Actually isn't it more often than not better for him that you go and occupy the territory he abandons? If it requires a garrison then he ends up having to pay for it in VPs. Also I don't get why anyone would abandon territory in a quiet China scenario; isn't the whole point of quiet China that you can't fight meaning that there is no risk holding territory even if exposed?
User avatar
moore4807
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Punta Gorda FL

RE: China Line

Post by moore4807 »

+1

Sangeli - you hit the nail on the head with your question, I was too chicken that I was missing something really basic before I opened my mouth about that. [:D]
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: China Line

Post by John 3rd »

Does make life a lot easier. He wants a PACIFIC WAR and this is fine by me. With the exception of Changsha, I get all the territory I wanted for the initial phase of the war. My air units will remain active but that will be about it.

I've already bought out two beat-up China ID for 1/3 their full strength cost. Got to like that. They'll be full strength by the time push comes to shove.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
Sangeli
Posts: 1132
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

RE: China Line

Post by Sangeli »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd
I've already bought out two beat-up China ID for 1/3 their full strength cost. Got to like that. They'll be full strength by the time push comes to shove.
Honestly I'm of the opinion that quiet China is better for Japan than the Allies. Japan can move units from China elsewhere while the Allies cannot as China is effectively cut off from the rest of the world. Although maybe that's just cause I'm good at China; I suppose with newbies there is plenty of opportunity for easy VPs by crushing Chinese corps.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: China Line

Post by John 3rd »

I concur with Sangeli. It is now Jan 17th and I have bought out a pair of banged up Infantry Divisions (Dirt CHEAP!) as well as a Brigade. Everything, except for Changsha, is mine to NE, E, SE and SW. Got it practically for free so we'll consider this a GOOD THING.

This game has turned absolutely BORING. Cannot find enemy ships, aircraft, ANYTHING...

Can you say Sir ROBIN??!! Yep...thought ya could...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
Sangeli
Posts: 1132
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

RE: China Line

Post by Sangeli »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd
This game has turned absolutely BORING. Cannot find enemy ships, aircraft, ANYTHING...

Can you say Sir ROBIN??!! Yep...thought ya could...
\
Well the best way to beat a Sir Robin strategy is to ignore areas that aren't part of your early game strategy and identify the areas where he does intend to defend in areas that are part of your strategy so you can bypass everything behind it. I recommend sending out small destroyer groups deep into his territory and trying to provoke a response to see where he intends to defend. Worst thing you can do against a BSR is preparing set piece attacks against places he doesn't want to defend in strength wasting valuable time and resources.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: China Line

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: Sangeli
ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Sherwood appears to be fine so we can get back to it.
At least until the next incident...

Mr. Sangeli does an excellent forecast here.

Sherwood, once again, petulantly QUIT. His email note tonight:

After some thought about it tonight, I think you should find a new opponent. I do not really want to go into all the reasons but just say that the game has taken some strange twists both in the game and outside of it. I am not enjoying myself at all and see no reason to continue. You would probably not be happy if we continued since I have ordered all units to disband withdraw back to off map areas or the West coast. I was planning on just sitting around until you won an auto victory or the middle of 1943, whatever happened first.



I'm done.

Time for a new game with a real opponent...

Is there a 'black list' site/thread for opponents with 'issues?' What a waste of time.
[:o][:@][:o]


Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: China Line

Post by JocMeister »

Uhm, oookay. [&:]
Image
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: China Line

Post by John 3rd »

My last Post might have been a little strong. Was rather...shall we say...'put out' when he sent that email last night.

Lew and I have been planning to start a new contest for quite some time. Hope he has recovered from losing ALL of Aussieland! [:D] Maybe this game was meant to die so we could get our 3rd campaign going? Let us hope so...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

SOPAC

Post by John 3rd »

I do believe that he was upset over this little event:



Image
Attachments
118KB.jpg
118KB.jpg (167.28 KiB) Viewed 444 times
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: SOPAC

Post by JocMeister »

Why would that make him so upset?
Image
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5246
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: SOPAC

Post by zuluhour »

RIDICULOUS! John, I would be honored to watch you try and take Australia from me.[8D]
User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2623
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

RE: SOPAC

Post by CaptBeefheart »

Sorry to hear it. As mentioned before, the point of a quiet China would be to hold your positions, I'd think. Also, your solution of drawing a pink line seemed reasonable, although perhaps your opponent could chime in with his thoughts.

On the bright side you didn't get too far into this game. Looking forward to another interesting AAR shortly.

Cheers,
CC
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: SOPAC

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

RIDICULOUS! John, I would be honored to watch you try and take Australia from me.[8D]

That is an interesting thought...



How serious is that proposal?


Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: SOPAC

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: Commander Cody

Sorry to hear it. As mentioned before, the point of a quiet China would be to hold your positions, I'd think. Also, your solution of drawing a pink line seemed reasonable, although perhaps your opponent could chime in with his thoughts.

On the bright side you didn't get too far into this game. Looking forward to another interesting AAR shortly.

Cheers,
CC

Thanks Cody!

You are correct. Whatever I decide for a new game, there will be an AAR.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5246
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: SOPAC

Post by zuluhour »

John, It was serious, I'm sure you could find an opponent in a New York minute, but I would like to be the guy. I'm going to stew a bit over the weekend and either put up or shut up.[8D]. If I my, what is your turn return time table need([:D]) desire ([8|])? When I was playing Terry THINZ I could do an AM and evening, now I am only evening but could swing two then between 5:00-10:00pm est.

ps. I would drop my current AAR and start a new one, I promised myself should I ever start a new game, I would be able to read an opposing thread when it was all said and done. I would request one from my opponent and as I have always enjoyed yours it would be a great teaser to start a game. I always wondered what THINZ was thinking, planning, feeling about our games and never really knew. He's playing the "market" now and has little interest in our two years of digital warfare.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: SOPAC

Post by John 3rd »

Shoot me an email and lets talk TURKEY! Figured that was the correct wording for this upcoming week.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: SOPAC

Post by ny59giants »

"WE" need to look at the new changes that Symon is doing for DBB, especially new LI to offset the lose of Refinery generated supply.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: SOPAC

Post by John 3rd »

YEP----"WE" noticed that...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
moore4807
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Punta Gorda FL

RE: SOPAC

Post by moore4807 »

What happened with the Turkey Talk???

Inquiring minds and all that...

I too would love to throw my hat in the ring, but i'm involved in two games already and think the third would be too much to give my full attention to... this match against Zuluhour would be required reading!
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”