Stay at sea

Post bug reports and ask for game support here.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

WIF_Killzone
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:51 pm

RE: Stay at sea

Post by WIF_Killzone »

Thanks, the problem might be between the chair and keyboard, I don't think I tried licking on the flags to ensure it was the current decision maker, not sure. I'll keep an eye out for it.
User avatar
paulderynck
Posts: 8505
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Canada

RE: Stay at sea

Post by paulderynck »

Don't you just love typos that pass spell check. [;)]
Paul
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Stay at sea

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: WIF_Killzone

Thanks, the problem might be between the chair and keyboard, I don't think I tried licking on the flags to ensure it was the current decision maker, not sure. I'll keep an eye out for it.
warspite1

Yes I've tried that too but to be honest it makes a slobbery mess of the monitor so I've stopped doing it.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
WIF_Killzone
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:51 pm

RE: Stay at sea

Post by WIF_Killzone »

LOL, licking, seriously. Did I actually spell that or did the forum SW use spell correct. I am working on requirements for a new system at work, and I have added spell checking and grammer checking, not sure if grammer checking would have helped on that one.
WIF_Killzone
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:51 pm

RE: Stay at sea

Post by WIF_Killzone »

Think I found one of the bugs, same issue that haunted me earlier. I have two British 2 point carriers in the Eastern Med both Loaded with 1 (each) 1 point baffins, which I elected to NOT stay at sea. They are both in the three box with a an American sub and American tac. It wont let me return the carriers to base to any port, in same sea zone or elsewhere. I don't think the Americans have anything to with it (for a change, hehe). Anyways, both carriers read "available this phase, 1/2 loaded with Baffin" and the baffins read: "flying loaded on Indomitable" and "flying loaded on Illustrious". Did I forget to land them, perhaps, but I don't think so, either way i'm trapped and have to reload. I suspect if I DONT elect to stay at sea the problem will go away--ill post again if that is not the case. These are the same carriers and planes that did this to me before.
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Stay at sea

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

ORIGINAL: WIF_Killzone

Think I found one of the bugs, same issue that haunted me earlier. I have two British 2 point carriers in the Eastern Med both Loaded with 1 (each) 1 point baffins, which I elected to NOT stay at sea. They are both in the three box with a an American sub and American tac. It wont let me return the carriers to base to any port, in same sea zone or elsewhere. I don't think the Americans have anything to with it (for a change, hehe). Anyways, both carriers read "available this phase, 1/2 loaded with Baffin" and the baffins read: "flying loaded on Indomitable" and "flying loaded on Illustrious". Did I forget to land them, perhaps, but I don't think so, either way i'm trapped and have to reload. I suspect if I DONT elect to stay at sea the problem will go away--ill post again if that is not the case. These are the same carriers and planes that did this to me before.
Can you attach a zipped GAM file to your next post if you can recreate this?
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
WIF_Killzone
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:51 pm

RE: Stay at sea

Post by WIF_Killzone »

Attached is the Return to Base file that shows the carriers unable to RTB. I will also post the Stay at Sea file in case you need as well.
Attachments
CarrierIssueRTB.zip
(1.57 MiB) Downloaded 7 times
WIF_Killzone
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:51 pm

RE: Stay at sea

Post by WIF_Killzone »

Stay at Sea file attached.
Attachments
CarrierIssueSAS.zip
(1.57 MiB) Downloaded 10 times
WIF_Killzone
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:51 pm

RE: Stay at sea

Post by WIF_Killzone »

Attached is an earlier version of same game. The two carriers had problems then as well, when opening this game, I get the following message:

"Warning, game damaged (#105). Illustrious is transporting Baffin. But Baffin is NOT being transported. Correction made."

I have no idea how it ended up like this but the program does seem to fix this issue and the carriers could RTB.

Good luck!
Attachments
Britishca..tobase.zip
(1.56 MiB) Downloaded 7 times
WIF_Killzone
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:51 pm

RE: Stay at sea

Post by WIF_Killzone »

Any update with this, just happened again, zip attached. Problem seems to be with carrier 1/2 loaded in 3 box that elects not to stay at sea, as with this example in timor sea..
Attachments
temp.zip
(1.57 MiB) Downloaded 8 times
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Stay at sea

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

ORIGINAL: WIF_Killzone

Any update with this, just happened again, zip attached. Problem seems to be with carrier 1/2 loaded in 3 box that elects not to stay at sea, as with this example in timor sea..
I'll try to get to this, this weekend. I just fixed another bug related to stay at sea earlier this week.
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
chemkid
Posts: 1238
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:02 pm

RE: Stay at sea

Post by chemkid »

.
Ncore
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:26 pm

RE: Stay at sea

Post by Ncore »

Could this be the same bug?

I should return the German 6-movers to port from Faroes Gap (2-box), but the ports at the coast of North Sea give me that stupid "X over the circle"-cursor. Can't try to fight my way through the North Sea either, that gives me just the X-cursor. CW still has ships in North Sea that are returning to base (in addition to those that are staying out to hunt the Kriegsmarine).

So I am stuck at the end of turn "Return to base: Axis"-phase.
Attachments
RTB1.jpg
RTB1.jpg (336.06 KiB) Viewed 336 times
"Why does any advanced civilization seek to destroy a less advanced one? Because the land is strategically valuable, because there are resources that can be cultivated and exploited, but most of all, simply because they can."

G'Kar, Babylon 5
Ncore
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:26 pm

RE: Stay at sea

Post by Ncore »

<nvm>
"Why does any advanced civilization seek to destroy a less advanced one? Because the land is strategically valuable, because there are resources that can be cultivated and exploited, but most of all, simply because they can."

G'Kar, Babylon 5
User avatar
lomyrin
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: San Diego

RE: Stay at sea

Post by lomyrin »

When you do a return to base past another sea area where there are enemy ships staying at sea, you get the x in the circle cursor. That indicates that you have to fight your way through and you activate that sequence by moving your returning ships to that sea area with a ctrl move. this gets you there for a possible intercept action.
Ncore
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:26 pm

RE: Stay at sea

Post by Ncore »

Duh... didn't realize to use CTRL. Thanks Lars :)
"Why does any advanced civilization seek to destroy a less advanced one? Because the land is strategically valuable, because there are resources that can be cultivated and exploited, but most of all, simply because they can."

G'Kar, Babylon 5
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”