Friendly Challenge

Distant Worlds is a vast, pausable real-time, 4X space strategy game which models a "living galaxy" with incredible options for replayability and customizability. Experience the full depth and detail of large turn-based strategy games, but with the simplicity and ease of real-time, and on the scale of a massively-multiplayer online game. Now greatly enhanced with the new Universe release, which includes all four previous releases as well as the new Universe expansion!

Moderators: Icemania, elliotg

User avatar
Icemania
Posts: 1847
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:14 am
Location: Australia

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Icemania »

ORIGINAL: Darkspire
Sneak attacks. Quameno victory conditions penalise you if you declare war.

Not only has he given up cutting the legs off the horse he has now fitted it with roller skates ... [:D]

Darkspire
A competent AI would be able to do that as well.

These days it's all about how much margin the race is won by ... at least it's fun!

User avatar
Darkspire
Posts: 1986
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 8:07 pm
Location: My Own Private Hell

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Darkspire »

These days it's all about how much margin the race is won by ... at least it's fun!

Just be sure to keep this thread going, It is a great addition to the forum, I will give you a run for your money (with rockets on me roller skates and a cybernetic nag) as soon as I am able ... [;)]

Darkspire
User avatar
Icemania
Posts: 1847
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:14 am
Location: Australia

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Icemania »

ORIGINAL: Darkspire
Just be sure to keep this thread going, It is a great addition to the forum, I will give you a run for your money (with rockets on me roller skates and a cybernetic nag) as soon as I am able ... [;)]
For the first time I pretty much have a blank sheet of paper in strategy for my next game. I did slow down from about 2124 though as only one homeworld was invaded after that but if I had kept troop production going it could have been a couple more.

So I'll need that friendly run for the money from the community ... or someone to suggest settings to play on their turf.




User avatar
Spidey
Posts: 455
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 11:39 am

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Spidey »

Try to see how well you can do with exclusively automated explorers. That ought to make things a whole lot harder while reducing the micro quite significantly.
User avatar
Icemania
Posts: 1847
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:14 am
Location: Australia

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Icemania »

As Darkspire has said I have no interest these days in cutting more legs off the horse. Indeed there are far more effective ways to cut the legs off the horse than automated explorers which I've tried before like a Harsh start when all other Empires are Tech Level 5 and Mature on Extreme. Watching Explorers do utterly stupid things would be frustrating to watch so thanks but no thanks.

Inspire me with new strategy ideas Spidey!
User avatar
Spidey
Posts: 455
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 11:39 am

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Spidey »

A new strategy idea is a much tougher challenge, though. And I was hoping to think of something that would reduce the micro to the point where I wouldn't absolutely feel too lazy to join the fray. :-)

Max micro explorers is so powerful. It gives you such a nice competitive advantage. Tech bonus from wrecks, planet squishers, ruin techs, WotA, knowledge of resource rich clusters, super luxuries, clusters of habitable planets, indies. That big and scary unknown void can turn into a lunchbox pretty quickly, but on the other hand it's a micro nightmare of the worst kind to carry out the approach on a 1000+ system galaxy. Without some sort of limitation on how effectively you explore the universe, the optimal approach will necessarily involve a frankly rather silly amount of time invested into making sure every scout is operating at peak capacity. Making your explorerers dumb is one way to do it. Making them numerically limited is another.

However, if you don't want to hold yourself back like that then how about respawning pirates? They're not strong enough to really screw you over, but they're strong enough that you have to be more conservative with your defense and since they respawn, you can't just send out a fleet to clear an area permanently.

Alternatively, how about a bit of roleplay? No sneak attacking while at WotA, no declaring wars of convenience while using a "peaceful" race or government type? Maybe even try to follow the tech priorities specified in the policy file of your race of choice? Granted, this is still more of a personal limitation than an actual strategic paradigm change, but it's hard to change the strategy much as long as the objective is to win as massively as possible with no holds barred (beyond early derelict capital ships and tech trading), since most games really do reward one approach at least a little bit more.


Anyway, the above was me offloading some stray thoughts on how to get a different experience by changing the context, which is something we can probably achieve even more efficiently once Universe arrives. I suppose the relevance is somewhat questionable, even if I felt like writing it all the same. You're asking for strategy ideas for the current context? Well, you might gain a tiny bit by obsoleting civ ships during the early pre-ward research era. There's no point in wasting resources on what is by and large a cross between pirate bait and floating space debris with directional thrusters.

I'm sure there's some potential for space port location optimization but it's a pain in the ass to figure out exactly how to do this optimally. I tend to think less is more in terms of the number of space ports but then I'm also new, inexperienced, and for some reason most of the "older" people around here seem to think differently.

For research, I think the proper order of things is more or less well established. For energy, the priority is proper warp drives, shields, ranged resource scanners, and long range scanners. Then better reactors, warp drives, and engines that can actually move bigger hulls. For weapons, the priority is reasonable troops, armor for your ships, and then ultimate torpedos. Point defense, logistics, ion defense, and of course mech infantry are probably next. For HT, the priority is getting energy collectors, biggers hulls, wonders for some fairly massive competitive advantages, maybe the early colonization techs, and then better cargo bays, fuel cells, docking bays, life support systems, in roughly whatever order you feel like. Targeting systems, ECM, and damage control are also quite nifty research targets at this point.

Some variation of the above approach gives you what you really need as fast as possible, doesn't it? But one thing that does spring to mind, and which I haven't seen anyone mention, is that once you've got those weapon basics, you don't really seem to need more weapon research for a while, do you? Would it be worth it to downscale your weapon research, shifting the majority of your research points to an even split between energy and HT? Going from 33% to 50% of your imperial potential research is essentially a 50% increase and it seems to me that a hyperfusion reactor, good engines, and size 700+ hulls are more beneficial than having the option to put laser weapons or area weapons onto your ships.

What else is there? Getting as much utility as possible out of mining stations and civilian ships? I'm sure you're doing that already. Long range scanners and science labs on stations? Why not? Using gas mining stations as strategic resupply depots with an appropriate docking and cargo capacity? Again, why not? It's not like the civs have a hard time paying for it. But I'm pretty sure you're the one who inspired me to throw science labs on mining stations in the first place so I'm sure you're already doing your best to push as many of your expenses onto the private sector as possible.
User avatar
Darkspire
Posts: 1986
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 8:07 pm
Location: My Own Private Hell

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Darkspire »

Max micro explorers is so powerful. It gives you such a nice competitive advantage. Tech bonus from wrecks, planet squishers, ruin techs, WotA, knowledge of resource rich clusters, super luxuries, clusters of habitable planets, indies. That big and scary unknown void can turn into a lunchbox pretty quickly, but on the other hand it's a micro nightmare of the worst kind to carry out the approach on a 1000+ system galaxy. Without some sort of limitation on how effectively you explore the universe, the optimal approach will necessarily involve a frankly rather silly amount of time invested into making sure every scout is operating at peak capacity. Making your explorerers dumb is one way to do it. Making them numerically limited is another.

I found that out a few years ago and have since left my explorers on auto, 20 per game. It than allows a bit more of a random pot luck with what you find.
However, if you don't want to hold yourself back like that then how about respawning pirates? They're not strong enough to really screw you over, but they're strong enough that you have to be more conservative with your defense and since they respawn, you can't just send out a fleet to clear an area permanently.

That is a must have, as the game progresses and the empire numbers drop they fill the empty space, if you do not keep an eye on them they can get quite strong, pirates must be set to full strength on both sliders
But one thing that does spring to mind, and which I haven't seen anyone mention, is that once you've got those weapon basics, you don't really seem to need more weapon research for a while, do you? Would it be worth it to downscale your weapon research, shifting the majority of your research points to an even split between energy and HT? Going from 33% to 50% of your imperial potential research is essentially a 50% increase and it seems to me that a hyperfusion reactor, good engines, and size 700+ hulls are more beneficial than having the option to put laser weapons or area weapons onto your ships.

Your forgetting troops are in the weapons research tab, not to mention the Logistic savings, increasing troop strength is a must against pirate incursion.

Darkspire
User avatar
Spidey
Posts: 455
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 11:39 am

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Spidey »

How much troop research do you really need? Up to Armored Shock Forces for invasions and Superior Defense Tactics for pirate defense? Maybe all the way to Superior Logistics to keep troop costs down? Add Ablative Metals for access to reactive armor, Enhanced Missiles and Point Defense Weapons for some basic anti-fighter weapons, and possibly even Enhanced Beam Weapons, Ion Weapons, and EMP Defenses for some ion defense. Those things and ultimate torps still only have a commulative cost of ~34m research points. Take out Sup Logist and you're cutting off a further ~7.5m points, ending up at 26.5 million, which by my count is about a forth of what it costs to get all the nifty stuff from energy and HT.

The thing is, I'm not saying that reducing weapons research for most of the mid to late game is an optimal way to do things. I haven't even tested the approach at this point. I'm simply speculating that the benefit of weighting weapons reserch equally with the other areas might be limited once you've gotten a resonable level of armor, the most necessary troop techs, and tier 7 torpedoes.
User avatar
Icemania
Posts: 1847
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:14 am
Location: Australia

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Icemania »

For this game with troop research up to near 2117, I decided to do nothing. Up to that point it's just invading independents and defence. In preparation for ground force spamming, I research armour, and then the first two logistics technologies. Then back to Torpedoes. I don't even bother with Point Defence or Ion Weapons. I normally conduct more research in Energy and much more in High Tech for the reasons you have outlined. That said I didn't quite finish Plasma Hardening so I could probably optimise that a little to improve the score.

When it comes to roleplay and different ways to play, this game has plenty of variety. It's been a while since I've played respawning pirates so will do that next game, cheers. But there is nothing I'd like more than for someone to top these scores by doing something radically new strategically.



User avatar
Spidey
Posts: 455
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 11:39 am

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Spidey »

With expensive tech, the costs in research points is twice what I outlined, isn't it? If the research potential is essentially equivalent to basic research points generated per year, and I suspect that it might be, then you'd need a figure approaching 50 million research points to get to the end of the weapons research. Getting 50 mil points in a single area in 30 years or less is not exactly trivial, so I suspect what I'm suggesting works better if you've got a realistic chance to actually see the end of the tech tree before the game ends.

A thing I'm also realising is that expensive research cost might actually make your full scout efficiency approach even more effective. The AI isn't very good at taking advantage of derelicts but there seems to be a chance to get a free tech from each dismantled wreck, and the value of free tech is proportional to how long it would've taken to get it.

Anyways, I'll have a go at your challenge eventually, but I can just about guarantee that I won't be able to break your score, as I simply don't have the stamina for monster micro. Hell, I probably won't even break half a mil in a mere 30 years on extreme difficulty, at least not without using the Spidarians, a race of insectoid octopeds that tend to be extremely research-capable genius engineers who breed like ants, have no philosophical issues with being at war, and who naturally organize themselves according to the WotA. [:)]
User avatar
Icemania
Posts: 1847
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:14 am
Location: Australia

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Icemania »

ORIGINAL: Spidey
Anyways, I'll have a go at your challenge eventually, but I can just about guarantee that I won't be able to break your score, as I simply don't have the stamina for monster micro. Hell, I probably won't even break half a mil in a mere 30 years on extreme difficulty, at least not without using the Spidarians, a race of insectoid octopeds that tend to be extremely research-capable genius engineers who breed like ants, have no philosophical issues with being at war, and who naturally organize themselves according to the WotA. [:)]
It's a friendly target. Hopefully it helps a few people keep strategising to try to break it, I'd like everyone to help everyone lift their scores. And even better somebody does break it!

User avatar
Icemania
Posts: 1847
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:14 am
Location: Australia

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Icemania »

That's it! Nothing from the old timers ... yes you know who you are. I'm going to start some friendly sledging ...
User avatar
Darkspire
Posts: 1986
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 8:07 pm
Location: My Own Private Hell

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Darkspire »

ORIGINAL: Icemania

That's it! Nothing from the old timers ... yes you know who you are. I'm going to start some friendly sledging ...

That's because I'm busy

And the word Veteran is soooo much better than 'old timer' thank you [:D]

Darkspire
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Shark7 »

ORIGINAL: Darkspire

ORIGINAL: Icemania

That's it! Nothing from the old timers ... yes you know who you are. I'm going to start some friendly sledging ...

That's because I'm busy

And the word Veteran is soooo much better than 'old timer' thank you [:D]

Darkspire

Unless your me, in which case 'grumpy old man' is a much more fitting description. Now...GET OFF MY LAWN! [:D]
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
User avatar
Icemania
Posts: 1847
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:14 am
Location: Australia

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Icemania »

Well at least you guys have responded so I'll play nice for the moment. Feel free to join me with friendly sledging of others.

Let's start with Kayoz. What a mighty big voice you have! But one can only assume small gameplay. Will you respond if I mention Steam? Care to provide some evidence to prove me wrong? [:D]


User avatar
Icemania
Posts: 1847
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:14 am
Location: Australia

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Icemania »

Ashbery76, wow I see you started posting here 4 years ago. As one of our Veterans you must have some tricks we haven't thought of yet. But then again ... maybe not? Show us your snowball ... [:D]
Canute0
Posts: 616
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:43 am
Location: Germany

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Canute0 »

Maybe a different challenge ?

Win the game with your Race victory conditions, compare the date and maybe the score.


• Play a Pirate Empire at the Age of shadows.
• 700/1000 Stars, 10 x 10 Sectors. I don't like 1400 it takes to much time for a safegame.
• PreWarp Expansion, Extreme Difficulty, Difficulty Scales Near Victory
• Restless Aggression
• Very Many Strong Pirates, Nearby Distance, No Respawn
• Many Space Creatures
• Expensive Research
• Abundant Colonies, Teeming Independent Life
• Excellent Homeworld, Starting, Pre-Warp, Normal Corruption, Centre
• 15 Empires, Excellent Homeworld, Pre-Warp
• Victory Only Pirate-specific
• No Original/Shakturi Storyline

What do you think ?



User avatar
Icemania
Posts: 1847
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:14 am
Location: Australia

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Icemania »

Never got into the Pirate game but sure why not. Your challenge Canute so what's the score we need to beat? In the meantime I'm a bit busy blowing up Borg Cubes on the Star Trek Armada 3 mod for Sins of a Solar Empire ...
User avatar
elanaagain
Posts: 254
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2013 6:16 pm

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by elanaagain »

I am in awe of some of the scores earned on this thread. Wow. I would love to participate in these friendly challenges. However, I hate the big maps. I prefer a smaller space with very few colonies, very few independents, very few colonizable planets, moons. Is there an interest in this? If so, I will set up the game parameters. Should I start a new thread, or leave it here?
USA = Corporatist Serfdom of America: free range surf technology
User avatar
Darkspire
Posts: 1986
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 8:07 pm
Location: My Own Private Hell

RE: Friendly Challenge

Post by Darkspire »

ORIGINAL: elanaagain

I am in awe of some of the scores earned on this thread. Wow. I would love to participate in these friendly challenges. However, I hate the big maps. I prefer a smaller space with very few colonies, very few independents, very few colonizable planets, moons. Is there an interest in this? If so, I will set up the game parameters. Should I start a new thread, or leave it here?

Leave it in this thread, see the post a few back from Canute, he posted his setup parameters there for a game challenge.

I will be participating as soon as I can, bit busy at present.

Darkspire
Post Reply

Return to “Distant Worlds 1 Series”