Reduced blizzard effect

Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: The German-Soviet War 1941-1945 is a turn-based World War II strategy game stretching across the entire Eastern Front. Gamers can engage in an epic campaign, including division-sized battles with realistic and historical terrain, weather, orders of battle, logistics and combat results.

The critically and fan-acclaimed Eastern Front mega-game Gary Grigsby’s War in the East just got bigger and better with Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: Don to the Danube! This expansion to the award-winning War in the East comes with a wide array of later war scenarios ranging from short but intense 6 turn bouts like the Battle for Kharkov (1942) to immense 37-turn engagements taking place across multiple nations like Drama on the Danube (Summer 1944 – Spring 1945).

Moderators: Joel Billings, elmo3, Sabre21

Post Reply
User avatar
STEF78
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:22 pm
Location: Versailles, France

Reduced blizzard effect

Post by STEF78 »

I currently play a GC as german and I'm reaching the blizzard with a good map (from my point of view).

SHC lost >3M men, >120 Inf Div and the front is running from Rostov, Voronezh, Ryazan, Kaluga, Kalinin to Ladoga (Leningrad has Fallen)

Image

I have the temptation of a forward defence.

Did someone try it successfully?
GHC 9-0-3
SHC 10-0-4
User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: Reduced blizzard effect

Post by Flaviusx »

Disgruntled Veteran I think recently came close to this with good results, especially north of the Oka.

The south is tougher to hold on to due to the open terrain.
WitE Alpha Tester
User avatar
STEF78
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:22 pm
Location: Versailles, France

RE: Reduced blizzard effect

Post by STEF78 »

You're right, but except South of Voronezh and near Rostov, russian Cv's are often 1 or sometimes 2.

So a german div Cv 6/8 with 36+ (4*4) + (2*4)= 60 % should be able to hold...

60 are 36+ defence + 2 levels forts
GHC 9-0-3
SHC 10-0-4
User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: Reduced blizzard effect

Post by Flaviusx »

Try it and see! This is all new to everybody.
WitE Alpha Tester
User avatar
STEF78
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:22 pm
Location: Versailles, France

RE: Reduced blizzard effect

Post by STEF78 »

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

Disgruntled Veteran I think recently came close to this with good results, especially north of the Oka.

Did he make an AAR?
GHC 9-0-3
SHC 10-0-4
User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: Reduced blizzard effect

Post by Flaviusx »

He did, it's the one versus A-Game. I think your chances are good based on his results.
WitE Alpha Tester
User avatar
STEF78
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:22 pm
Location: Versailles, France

Reduced blizzard effect

Post by STEF78 »

I just played turn 26, 11 december 1941. 2nd turn of blizzard.

It's incredible! I'm able to counterattack successfully russian units in clear terrain.

Image

Losses aren't impressive but it has notihng to see with my old expériences of blizzard.

Image
GHC 9-0-3
SHC 10-0-4
User avatar
A game
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue May 08, 2012 10:35 pm

RE: Reduced blizzard effect

Post by A game »

As I am DV's opponent I have to say the new Blizzard rules, with .13 are a whole new ball game.

Good terrain plus forts can actually stop the soviets now, the south probably still requires some running early on but overall I think a 1st winter hold the line defense is totally viable in the north. I really, really like this optional rule as I always thought the old blizzard was way over the top.

The constant morale bleed when not in towns seems to be taking its toll on DV, as it seems he committed most of his forces to hold the line, not sure how much that will impact going into 42.
User avatar
STEF78
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:22 pm
Location: Versailles, France

RE: Reduced blizzard effect

Post by STEF78 »

ORIGINAL: A game

As I am DV's opponent I have to say the new Blizzard rules, with .13 are a whole new ball game.

Good terrain plus forts can actually stop the soviets now, the south probably still requires some running early on but overall I think a 1st winter hold the line defense is totally viable in the north. I really, really like this optional rule as I always thought the old blizzard was way over the top.

The constant morale bleed when not in towns seems to be taking its toll on DV, as it seems he committed most of his forces to hold the line, not sure how much that will impact going into 42.
I'm now 18 december 1941 and I confirm that the lines holds firmly north of Kaluga.

On the southern part it dépends on the strength of SHC. I gave up Ryazan and Rostov but fights for Voronezh.

Much more interesting than the previous blizzard!
GHC 9-0-3
SHC 10-0-4
User avatar
STEF78
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:22 pm
Location: Versailles, France

Reduced blizzard effect

Post by STEF78 »

Just to better appreciate the situation, the front line before the mud

Image

GHC 9-0-3
SHC 10-0-4
governato
Posts: 1364
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 4:35 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

RE: Reduced blizzard effect

Post by governato »

The fact that the front line is not a straight line like in most previous games makes me think that the game is really improving! The 42 Summer campaign looks pretty interesting.

Subscribed to the thread....:)
User avatar
STEF78
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:22 pm
Location: Versailles, France

RE: Reduced blizzard effect

Post by STEF78 »

ORIGINAL: governato

The fact that the front line is not a straight line like in most previous games makes me think that the game is really improving! The 42 Summer campaign looks pretty interesting.

Subscribed to the thread....:)
Maybe I will post an AAR, even if the last one wasn't a succes!
GHC 9-0-3
SHC 10-0-4
User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: Reduced blizzard effect

Post by Flaviusx »

The more results the merrier, really. Any data at all is good here as it's fresh. So far I'm pretty happy with what I'm seeing, though. This is really a much better iteration of the blizzard.

I might want to tweak the numbers a bit, but in principle this is looking good.
WitE Alpha Tester
Priapus1
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:24 pm

RE: Reduced blizzard effect

Post by Priapus1 »

ORIGINAL: STEF78

ORIGINAL: governato

The fact that the front line is not a straight line like in most previous games makes me think that the game is really improving! The 42 Summer campaign looks pretty interesting.

Subscribed to the thread....:)
Maybe I will post an AAR, even if the last one wasn't a succes!

Yes, please.
governato
Posts: 1364
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 4:35 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

RE: Reduced blizzard effect

Post by governato »

ORIGINAL: STEF78

ORIGINAL: governato

The fact that the front line is not a straight line like in most previous games makes me think that the game is really improving! The 42 Summer campaign looks pretty interesting.

Subscribed to the thread....:)
Maybe I will post an AAR, even if the last one wasn't a succes!

yes! And it does not need to be blow by blow, general frontlines, OOB and arm points 'd be great..good luck for Summer!
User avatar
GamesaurusRex
Posts: 505
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:10 pm

RE: Reduced blizzard effect

Post by GamesaurusRex »

Are you playing vs AI ? or vs a human ?
"Real Life" is a game... THIS is war !
User avatar
STEF78
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:22 pm
Location: Versailles, France

RE: Reduced blizzard effect

Post by STEF78 »

ORIGINAL: GamesaurusRex

Are you playing vs AI ? or vs a human ?
Versus human, AI is stupid but never complain
GHC 9-0-3
SHC 10-0-4
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series”