The Red Menace (Topeverest vs Admiral Kamikaze)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 57 - July 16, 1942 Combat Zone specifics

Post by topeverest »

Sevastopol - A minor attack in my view. Don't think the enemy has plans to cross the Kerch.

Image
Attachments
Sevestopol.jpg
Sevestopol.jpg (235.66 KiB) Viewed 172 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 57 - July 16, 1942 Combat Zone specifics

Post by topeverest »

KURSK

Here I am within a turn or two of counterattacking the lone Panzer ball. I feel like I can stop this push given the force I have assembled. Strategically to stop this german offensive, I am planning on closing it in from the south and north and flexing in the middle. This is exactly what I have done here.

I am not certain from a summer campaign perspective that I can outright stop the panzer balls, but perhaps it is enough to fight them to an attrition stalemate on and around the Don and Donets.

Image
Attachments
Kursk.jpg
Kursk.jpg (260.24 KiB) Viewed 172 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 57 - July 16, 1942 Combat Zone specifics

Post by topeverest »

BELGOROD

Here is the southern talon of my planned offensive - straight into a second more powerful panzer ball.

I am making a stand at the Torrets Oscal rivers and several large combats occurred there.

Image
Attachments
Belgorod.jpg
Belgorod.jpg (569.55 KiB) Viewed 172 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 57 - July 16, 1942 Combat Zone specifics

Post by topeverest »

STALINO

Here I had to withdrawal and reorganize behind the nearest river due to continued german onslaught. I am still planning to flex east in the Stalino area

Image
Attachments
Stalino.jpg
Stalino.jpg (335.84 KiB) Viewed 172 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 57 - July 16, 1942 the HOT zone

Post by topeverest »

The Germans are methodically splitting open the Mius river defense.
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 57 - July 16, 1942 the HOT zone

Post by topeverest »

The MIUS River

here are details on the enemy's tactics...very thorough approach to cracking the river.

Question - look at how low the casualties were on the RED highlighted combat sequence. two failed river crossings with only a few hundred casualties. How to do you do that?

in any event it will only be a turn or two until the battle of Rostov begins. As stated above, I will flex east and hold firm at Rostov and the Don.

Should be exciting!

Image
Attachments
Mius.jpg
Mius.jpg (940.25 KiB) Viewed 172 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 57 - July 16, 1942 Production

Post by topeverest »

I am making 659 AFV per turn if I am looking at this correctly.

Image
Attachments
production.jpg
production.jpg (309.91 KiB) Viewed 172 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 57 - July 16, 1942 Losses

Post by topeverest »

Losses are heavy...note turn losses are only for my half of turn below is his half of turn.

Image
Attachments
ground losses.jpg
ground losses.jpg (57.98 KiB) Viewed 172 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 57 - July 16, 1942 Losses

Post by topeverest »

Here were the losses as of his half of the turn.

I wish the turn totals would add for a cumulative...

Image
Attachments
losses2.jpg
losses2.jpg (54.61 KiB) Viewed 172 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 57 - July 16, 1942 ending Comments

Post by topeverest »

I will try to do air next update. The battlefield is rapidly changing so I might go to updates each turn.

I feel satisfied that losses in this campaign are 2 to 1 or less, and I feel that I can stop the summer offensive if no other place than behind the Don and Donets. Time will tell to be sure.
Andy M
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11705
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

RE: Turn 57 - July 16, 1942 Production

Post by loki100 »

sounds like a great game ... be interesting to see where you can finally stall the German offensive
timmyab
Posts: 2046
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:48 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

RE: Turn 57 - July 16, 1942 Production

Post by timmyab »

He'll be lucky to get across the Donets at this rate and all to no avail anyway. I think his strategy is wrong here. Two to one casualties is suicide for the Axis player, he should be concentrating on cleaving off small bits of your army for four or five to one. Those guards stacks in particular look like very tasty targets.
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 57 - July 16, 1942 Production

Post by topeverest »

Admiral Kamikaze may now read this AAR as desired.

Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 57 - July 16, 1942 Production

Post by topeverest »

Can you be a bit more specific. Is this just attacking at 4-5 to one where you can or is there a deeper tactic?
ORIGINAL: timmyab

He'll be lucky to get across the Donets at this rate and all to no avail anyway. I think his strategy is wrong here. Two to one casualties is suicide for the Axis player, he should be concentrating on cleaving off small bits of your army for four or five to one. Those guards stacks in particular look like very tasty targets.
Andy M
timmyab
Posts: 2046
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:48 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

RE: Turn 57 - July 16, 1942 Production

Post by timmyab »

No I mean 4 or 5 to one after the pockets have been eliminated, maybe even better than that if he targets some of those corps stacks.
Mind you, I'm not saying it would be easy or even possible. I'd be quite tempted to sue for peace actually.
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 61 - Aug 13, 1942

Post by topeverest »

Stalled front, massed combat has ruled the game these last turns. The Germans made a concerted push and took the Mius and three city bundle around Stalino. I retreated in good order after getting the line somewhat broken. I then threw in all my reserves into the area (save an army east of Kerch straight and one in Moscow).

I believe we are at a point where the Germans wont make too much more progress, despite the heavy combat. That said, they are maintaining the initiative quite well. As you will see I have created a double line on the Don / Donets while still fighting for every inch on the MLR.

I need to start thinking about a fall or early winter offensive. Should it be in the north to knock out Finland, or should it be in the south were I can maul large numbers of German troops. (probably the latter). I have been taking heavy air losses in bombers due to the amount of ground support I have been flying.

time will tell what the last 8-10 turns of good weather have in store, but I forecast heavy combat with minimal gains on either side.
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 61 - Tactical Situation

Post by topeverest »

Here is the tactical map. Not too many hexes will change hands soon I think

Image
Attachments
overview.jpg
overview.jpg (569.11 KiB) Viewed 172 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 61 - Tank Army

Post by topeverest »

I spent a bunch of admin points converting an army of tanks to an HQ with a tank army. Is there any real benefit?
Andy M
Gabriel B.
Posts: 501
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 9:44 am

RE: Turn 61 - Tank Army

Post by Gabriel B. »

ORIGINAL: topeverest

I spent a bunch of admin points converting an army of tanks to an HQ with a tank army. Is there any real benefit?

Afaik you get +1 point in the admin skill rating , i also build armys of tanks ( 9tank bde/3cav div ) build up into 4 corps later .

Who did you put in charge ? so far I only have 3 ( rybalko, batov, krivoshein )
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Naval brigade Question

Post by topeverest »

I tried to combine a naval infantry and naval rifle brigade and it refused. Can you combine naval brigades?
Andy M
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”