Bug in combat resolution

Post bug reports and ask for game support here.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

Post Reply
joshuamnave
Posts: 967
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 3:51 am
Contact:

Bug in combat resolution

Post by joshuamnave »

Attacking Gibraltar with 3 div invading, and 3 land units attacking. The attack left one Brit standing. Combat result required me to destroy 2 attackers and disorganize half the remaining (2d10 chart). But after destroying 2, it wants me to disorganize 2 more, and there is only one more available to disorganize. Can't proceed.

Image
Attachments
combatbug.jpg
combatbug.jpg (618.65 KiB) Viewed 162 times
Head Geek in Charge at politigeek.net - the intersection of politics and all things geeky
User avatar
AxelNL
Posts: 2389
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:43 pm
Location: The Netherlands

RE: Bug in combat resolution

Post by AxelNL »

I see 5 destroyed units. Did you destroy the invading ones first?
Numdydar
Posts: 3283
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:56 pm

RE: Bug in combat resolution

Post by Numdydar »

Really diasterous attack too [:(]
joshuamnave
Posts: 967
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 3:51 am
Contact:

RE: Bug in combat resolution

Post by joshuamnave »

The invaders were autodestroyed because the hex wasn't clear, and they did not count against the mandatory destroys. I had to destroy 2 of the non invaders.

Not such a disasterous attack, really. I needed a 13 to clear the hex, I rolled a 12. There were HQ's standing by to reorg the air and the remaining ground unit, and more ground units ready to both invade and move in to the hex north of Gibraltar, and a decent naval force ready to try to intercept any reinforcements coming in. Strong chance of finishing the job in the second impulse.
Head Geek in Charge at politigeek.net - the intersection of politics and all things geeky
User avatar
AxelNL
Posts: 2389
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:43 pm
Location: The Netherlands

RE: Bug in combat resolution

Post by AxelNL »

ORIGINAL: Zartacla

The invaders were autodestroyed because the hex wasn't clear, and they did not count against the mandatory destroys. I had to destroy 2 of the non invaders.

Not such a disasterous attack, really. I needed a 13 to clear the hex, I rolled a 12. There were HQ's standing by to reorg the air and the remaining ground unit, and more ground units ready to both invade and move in to the hex north of Gibraltar, and a decent naval force ready to try to intercept any reinforcements coming in. Strong chance of finishing the job in the second impulse.

I think the bug is that the code did not calculate the autodestroys for the disorganisation. It thinks those units are also available to choose from to disorg.
PS: I tried to find in the RAC where is says that the the invaders do not count against the mandatory destroys. Until now was not able to clearly find that.
joshuamnave
Posts: 967
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 3:51 am
Contact:

RE: Bug in combat resolution

Post by joshuamnave »

I assumed that was the bug as well. It's not a situation that will come up very often - probably in Gibraltar almost exclusively.
Head Geek in Charge at politigeek.net - the intersection of politics and all things geeky
User avatar
AxelNL
Posts: 2389
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:43 pm
Location: The Netherlands

RE: Bug in combat resolution

Post by AxelNL »

ORIGINAL: Zartacla

I assumed that was the bug as well. It's not a situation that will come up very often - probably in Gibraltar almost exclusively.

Perhaps Singapore.
joshuamnave
Posts: 967
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 3:51 am
Contact:

RE: Bug in combat resolution

Post by joshuamnave »

Maybe. But Singapore has 2 land hexes to attack from, so the ratio of invaders:land attackers should be better. Although, the bug will still hit and make the Japanese disorganize more units than they should have to - it just won't stop the game from proceeding. So in that respect, anywhere that you have an invasion with ground attackers (or a paradrop with ground attackers, presumably), the bug could hit.
Head Geek in Charge at politigeek.net - the intersection of politics and all things geeky
User avatar
michaelbaldur
Posts: 4805
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:28 pm
Location: denmark

RE: Bug in combat resolution

Post by michaelbaldur »

it is clearly a bug ..

never tried that kind of attack (land attack/invasion combined, with half disorganised ). so I misted that one
the wif rulebook is my bible

I work hard, not smart.

beta tester and Mwif expert

if you have questions or issues with the game, just contact me on Michaelbaldur1@gmail.com
User avatar
paulderynck
Posts: 8516
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Canada

RE: Bug in combat resolution

Post by paulderynck »

Any chance for a saved game from just prior to the combat, Zartacla?
Paul
joshuamnave
Posts: 967
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 3:51 am
Contact:

RE: Bug in combat resolution

Post by joshuamnave »

Nope, sorry... it's gone. Shouldn't be too hard for you to recreate the situation though.
Head Geek in Charge at politigeek.net - the intersection of politics and all things geeky
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Bug in combat resolution

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

ORIGINAL: Zartacla

The invaders were autodestroyed because the hex wasn't clear, and they did not count against the mandatory destroys. I had to destroy 2 of the non invaders.

Not such a disasterous attack, really. I needed a 13 to clear the hex, I rolled a 12. There were HQ's standing by to reorg the air and the remaining ground unit, and more ground units ready to both invade and move in to the hex north of Gibraltar, and a decent naval force ready to try to intercept any reinforcements coming in. Strong chance of finishing the job in the second impulse.
I have found a bug in those calculations and modified the code. I need for the beta testers to check the changes I made to make sure I there are no adverse effects. If that goes well over the weekend, you'll see those corrections in version 1.1.3.0 - hopefully on Monday (2/10/2014).
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”