Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by morvael »

Steady progress through the landbrige, despite tough opposition and difficult terrain:

Image
Attachments
capture_00..3_125352.jpg
capture_00..3_125352.jpg (539.06 KiB) Viewed 338 times
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by morvael »

Latvian border is so close:

Image
Attachments
capture_00..3_125358.jpg
capture_00..3_125358.jpg (548.74 KiB) Viewed 338 times
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by morvael »

Operation Red Death successful! The road to Vyborg was not protected adequately, and the city itself was garrisoned only by a single fortified zone. Pushing away two brigades and an infantry division was enough to reach the target. 3rd Guards Mechanized Corps and 10th Guards Tank Corps of Bogdanov's 3rd Tank Army forced the enemy to flee, while 4th Guards Tank Corps of Rybalko's 2nd Tank Army entered the city. STAVKA hopes that Finland is finished:


Image
Attachments
capture_00..3_125417.jpg
capture_00..3_125417.jpg (512.42 KiB) Viewed 338 times
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by morvael »

25 new rifle corps were formed, including 5 guards. Last week 4 corps were formed. This is done to reduce number of units, while increasing their strength. This will help with supply and command situation. For now the goal is to have 3 corps per army. Rotmistrov of the 1st Tank Army was promoted to General Armii.

Strength:
men: 9 950 628 vs 5 135 478
guns: 158 321 vs 52 057
AFVs: 15 886 vs 7 405
aircraft: 21 389 vs 3 471

Trucks:
in units: 264 627 / 270 477 (97.84%)
in the pool: 149 921 / 149 270 (100.44%)
in repair: 104 682

Losses:
killed: 22 261 vs 19 050
captured: 283 vs 1 103
disabled: 3 044 vs 6 753
guns: 661 vs 1 133
AFVs: 284 vs 47
aircraft: 101 vs 15

Including:
in combat: 38 vs 13
from AA: 8 vs 0
on the ground: 0 vs 0
operational: 55 vs 2
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11708
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by loki100 »

excellent bit of wailing on the Finns, you dismantled their defense lines pretty quickly

from your last post, seems as if the truck situation is finally under control?

If so, should help the drive to liberate the last sections of the USSR
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by morvael »

I think the road along the coast of the gulf and the city itself wasn't adequately protected and only because of that I got into the city so fast. Probably too many forces in Karelia and around Keksholm. Finland is not important to the greater war unless you count every single truck, and those forts on the Finnish No Attack Line costed me too much (huge distance to railhead, no HQ, also each unit takes it's base toll - therefore it's better to reduce their number). I did the attack just to be able to disband those forts and four naval rifle brigades.

Truck situation improved for 2-3 turns (enough for the "Red Death" operation), but soon the blizzard took it's toll and again it dropped below 100%. Only in snow and clear I can hope to return above 100%. The truth is also that the .12/.13 patch increased my truck needs considerably (by some 20k) because it was a trick on the old, buggy, version than when I moved support units from combat units (where I paid too much in trucks for them) to HQs (where I didn't pay in trucks for them) I was able to get above 100%. Now whether they are at HQs or combat units I have to pay the correct amount of trucks.

In this weather I can only push the Germans back and hope for their exhaustion because of losses. I can't outmaneuver them (seems to work on the Rumanians, but not on the Germans and Hungarians). Standard movement is one hex+attack or two hexes (for the rifle corps). With Axis one hex withdrawal it means I can't really break deep through his lines, and when I try to do it, they can quickly counterattack with strong panzers to rescue their surrounded unit (unit, because no more than 1 hex can be surrounded by my Tank Armies this way when there are no rifle corps to assist on the flanks). The Germans are not using my style of strong front-line defense, rather defend in depth, which means there are always ZOC penalties to pay and the movement slows down to a crawl. Also, due to reserve activations I have to use overwhelming force (deliberate attacks) so they will not trigger, turning my attack into defeat. Hasties are reserved only for 6:1 initial ratios on counters.

I also think the Guard Army requirements are too high, I haven't got a single army convert to Guards and it's already 1944! This would help with movement as they give +1 ADM.

Image
Attachments
trucks.jpg
trucks.jpg (281.12 KiB) Viewed 338 times
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by morvael »

Turn 136

Finland surrendered! Operation Red Death was a total success!

Slowly grinding on towards Nikolaev and Kirovograd:

Image
Attachments
capture_02..4_194424.jpg
capture_02..4_194424.jpg (532.84 KiB) Viewed 339 times
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by morvael »

Advancing on both sides of the Dnepr towards Kiev:

Image
Attachments
capture_02..4_194513.jpg
capture_02..4_194513.jpg (538.2 KiB) Viewed 338 times
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by morvael »

Center has serious problems with railroads, railheads are nearly hundred miles away to the back. It's hard to catch up with the retreating enemy:

Image
Attachments
capture_02..4_194649.jpg
capture_02..4_194649.jpg (521.54 KiB) Viewed 338 times
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by morvael »

Vitebsk captured by Konev's troops, his political rating improves. No doubt he is Stalin's favourite (as Zhukov bites the dust since June '41):

Image
Attachments
capture_02..4_194819.jpg
capture_02..4_194819.jpg (530.51 KiB) Viewed 338 times
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by morvael »

Leningrad Front reaches Estonian border west of Pskov. A new air tactics is tested - attacks on enemy airbases. The results are promising:

Image
Attachments
capture_02..4_194949.jpg
capture_02..4_194949.jpg (548.79 KiB) Viewed 340 times
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by morvael »

Strength:
men: 9 990 227 vs 4 781 548
guns: 159 073 vs 48 356
AFVs: 15 827 vs 7 061
aircraft: 21 456 vs 3 061

Trucks:
in units: 261 538 / 270 092 (96.83%)
in the pool: 150 967 / 157 104 (96.09%)
in repair: 109 383

Losses:
killed: 18 000 vs 14 788
captured: 210 vs 373
disabled: 1 159 vs 3 308
guns: 516 vs 863
AFVs: 315 vs 68
aircraft: 124 vs 57

Including:
in combat: 40 vs 30
from AA: 22 vs 2
on the ground: 0 vs 24
operational: 62 vs 1
User avatar
GamesaurusRex
Posts: 505
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:10 pm

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by GamesaurusRex »

What I want to know is why did the German Player in this game give so many "wins" to the Russian player in 41-42 ? Was this game versus stupid AI or against a player who was ignorant of the game mechanics that make it easy for the German to avoid this ?

If a human opponent plays the German side, he can effectively deny you 41-42 "wins" by simply not leaving his troops in exposed positions and the Russian will never develop so many Guards status units.

This bothers me because Morvael seems to think that the process of creating Russian Guards units is easy, when in fact, it is near impossible when the German side uses the game mechanics to thwart it.
"Real Life" is a game... THIS is war !
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by morvael »

I had no wins in 41 and 42 (blizzard excluded). For me "win" was when I was pushed back slowly and without losing units to encirclement.
User avatar
GamesaurusRex
Posts: 505
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:10 pm

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by GamesaurusRex »

So all your Guards units in this game were created in 43 ?

My point is that the game grants guard status on "wins" vs "losses" using a formula of three conditions ( according to the rules) . Nowhere in those rules does it state that retreats qualify as "wins". Are you telling me they do ?
"Real Life" is a game... THIS is war !
User avatar
Tarhunnas
Posts: 2997
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:19 am
Location: Hex X37, Y15

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by Tarhunnas »

It is quite common to get some Guards units before the blizzard, even against a competent human opponent. A German player cannot completely deny the Soviets any wins, possibly minimize them by playing extremely cautiously, but being that cautions as the German will hurt the Germans more than the Soviets.
------------------------------
RTW3 Designer
User avatar
GamesaurusRex
Posts: 505
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:10 pm

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by GamesaurusRex »

I am playing the Russian side on turn 99 of a PBEM (patch .11) against a highly competent German opponent and having managed to survive 42, I am in May 43 trying to figure out how the Russian is supposed to push back. So far no luck... up to this point, I, similar to you, have been pushed back without being encircled... but I have gained NO Guards.. in fact I had to give up some early Guards Divisions I was given initially to form Corp to stop the panzer ball.

I'm just wondering what mechanism people are using to gain guards. I don't see it being possible against a good opponent.
"Real Life" is a game... THIS is war !
User avatar
GamesaurusRex
Posts: 505
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:10 pm

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by GamesaurusRex »

ORIGINAL: Tarhunnas

It is quite common to get some Guards units before the blizzard, even against a competent human opponent. A German player cannot completely deny the Soviets any wins, possibly minimize them by playing extremely cautiously, but being that cautions as the German will hurt the Germans more than the Soviets.

Nonsense... Play Wheat... [:D]
"Real Life" is a game... THIS is war !
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4855
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by M60A3TTS »

Pelton's not highly competent? [&:]

I had 19 guards rifle divs by blizzard

Image
User avatar
GamesaurusRex
Posts: 505
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:10 pm

RE: Russia! Why not? (Morvael welcome)

Post by GamesaurusRex »

@M60A3TTS:

And you won your game against Pelton... Right ?
"Real Life" is a game... THIS is war !
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”